EcoLincNZ

Category: plant ecology

  • Our plants are not being poisoned by 1080 possum baits

    Our plants are not being poisoned by 1080 possum baits

    I’ll admit, before taking the 16 hour flight from Arizona to Christchurch, I didn’t know much about New Zealand besides ‘What We Do in the Shadows’, Karl Urban, and affordable yarn. I was especially excited to get my hands on possum yarn.  

    Possum yarn is coveted by the knitting community for its lightweightedness and warmth, only surpassed by the fur of arctic foxes and polar bears. And let me say that I absolutely think that the possum yarn was worth every dollar. With just 400 meters (one skein/ball) I was able to knit up a cabled hat, mittens, and still have some left over for some ankle length socks!  

    The feeling of possum yarn is incredibly soft and the natural brown color of the possum fur mixed with merino sheep wool makes for a more muted (in a good way) color palette. However, I recognise that the brushtail possum is a prevalent pest in New Zealand; so much so that drastic measures like Compound 1080 poison baits have been used since the mid-1950’s to control this introduced species. 

    Common Brushtail Possum by Catching The Eye, 2014 (CC BY-NC) 

    Compound 1080 for pest control in New Zealand 

    To put it simply, sodium fluoroacetate (AKA Compound 1080) is a vertebrate pesticide used to control introduced mammal species, such as rats, mice, feral cats, and possums. Without Compound 1080, these species decimate the population of endemic plants and animals only found in New Zealand. The compound is dispersed by aircraft(i.e. helicopters or fixed-wing planes) in either a carrot or cereal bait.  

    According to my professors, everyone has an opinion on the use of 1080. While Compound 1080 is great when it works, there are concerns from both the general public and Māori communities. From a public perspective, 1080 does have the real danger of killing people’s cats and dogs if accidentally ingested. As a pet owner myself, this is especially scary because my cat and dog would likely eat the bait before I’d have a chance to recognise what it was. Additionally, the Māori community has concerns about Compound 1080 leaching into the soil and then poisoning plants used for food or medicinal purposes.  

    Back in September 2003, a cooperative effort was made in New Zealand by the Ecology Department at Lincoln University, Landscape Research, Lake Waikaremoana Hapu Restoration Trust, and the Tūhoe Tuawhenua Trust to determine if Compound 1080 negatively impacts plant species used by the Ngāi Tūhoe Māori and if not, how to get this information spread among the iwi. To achieve this, a study was conducted on wild-growing pikopiko (AKA hen and chicken fern) and Karamuramu plants in State Forest Block 100, just south of Lake Waikaremoana. 

    Hen and Chickens Fern – Asplenium bulbiferum by John B, 2016 (CC BY-NC) 

    Ten individuals of each plant species were chosen and placed underneath wire mesh as protection against herbivory. Of the twenty plants, 3 of each species were exposed to a single Whanganui No. 7 cereal 1080 bait. Samples were taken from the plants throughout the study (days 0, 3, 7, 14, 28, and 56) as well as bait samples at the very beginning and end, to test for potential shift in potency over time.  

    More than 99% of the 1080 had disappeared from the baits by day 56 and all but one plant sample had no remaining amounts of 1080 within their systems. Of the twenty plants sampled, only one Karamuramu plant retained the toxin; and that was at most 5 parts per billion (ppb) and was completely gone by day 28.  

    Foodweb database 

    Karamuramu plant – Coprosma robusta by eyemac23, 2025 (CC BY-NC) 

    I don’t know about you, but I’ve never been a huge fan of reading scientific articles. They’re always confusing, too long, and to be honest, a bit dry. Sometimes I wish I could, instead, just scroll through a presentation with all the information presented short and sweetly.  

    Oh wait, this article did just that and made up not only a comprehensive food web on the interactions of the forest environment with 1080, but also added hyperlinks to it that opens a PowerPoint!(Note: the article did not include the link to the original PowerPoint, only an image of one of the slides.) Each PowerPoint slide focuses on a single plant or animal species impacted by 1080, the intensity of 1080 impact, and additional reference sources. It’s easy to digest and leaves room for more research if one wanted to do so.  

    Concerns from the Māori community 

    In conclusion, I get why using Compound 1080 is necessary against invasive species, like the brushtail possum and it will likely never impact me on a personal level unless it somehow leaches into a batch of yarn or something. However, I also can understand why the Ngāi Tūhoe Māori tribe are still hesitant as 1080 is still a toxin and we may not know the full impacts. While the decision to use Compound 1080 in the Te Urewera area is complicated, in 2016 those from the Ngāi Tūhoe tribe largely oppose aerial drops since it cannot be controlled.  

    Final thoughts 

    I think it’s important to note that for a 70 kg person to actually die from consuming 1080 that has remained in a Karamuramu plant, (and even in this example the probability of death is only 50%), they would have to eat 28 tons (28,000 kg) of the stuff. And that’s also if the plant is eaten raw, normally it’s boiled in water as a tea and diluted even more. Personally, after reading this I wouldn’t be too worried about Compound 1080 in my plants but I will still leave the risk assessment up to those in the Māori community on an individual level. 

    For now, I will continue to enjoy knitting with the luxurious possum yarn until the pests are eradicated from New Zealand once and for all.  

    This article was prepared by Master of International Nature Conservation student Marie Frackiewicz as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

    OGILVIE, S.C., ATARIA, J.M., WAIWAI, J., DOHERTY, J., MILLER, A., ROSS, J.G. and EASON, C.T. (2010), Vertebrate pesticide risk assessment by indigenous communities in New Zealand. Integrative Zoology, 5: 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4877.2010.00190.x  

  • Forests from grass: natural regeneration of woody vegetation on hill farms

    Forests from grass: natural regeneration of woody vegetation on hill farms

    If you’ve spent any amount of time travelling around Aotearoa New Zealand, you will have noticed the abysmal amount of forest trees in much of our country. Pre-human New Zealand was almost entirely covered in indigenous forest. You may have heard that statement before, but let’s just appreciate it for a second. 96% of the North Island and 72% of the South used to be lush with native podocarps, hardwoods, broadleaves, and beech trees. 

    Over the course of our relatively short history, we eventually destroyed a massive 14 million hectares of indigenous forest to make way for housing, industry, and farms. We were particularly keen on clearing drier and more arable regions like Canterbury and Central Otago, which have lost nearly 90% of their original vegetation. 

    By 2002, only a quarter of that indigenous vegetation remained. Don’t get me wrong, I like living here, that people can make money here, and I like eating fresh food. But, damn, I also like breathing oxygen…

    Looking around Akaroa Harbour, the hills have mostly been cleared of indigenous vegetation at one point or another since human arrival to the area (own photos).

    In all seriousness, native trees play much more important roles than that. Native forests can protect us from wildfires, help us avoid droughts, increase soil, water, and air quality, reduce erosion, and provide habitat for unique native species that do their part in making all of these ecosystem services available to us. As well as that, the land itself, the rugged forests, and activities like hiking through native trees forms part of our cultural identity, not to mention a reasonable chunk of our tourism industry.

    What’s more, our native forests store an incredible amount of carbon – an estimated 1.7 billion tonnes.

    In order for New Zealand to transition to a low-emissions economy and reach its climate change targets by 2050, we need to plant a lot more trees …up to 2.8 million hectares’ worth. The Productivity Commission suggested that most of this land could come from marginal farmland. As it turns out, there is an estimated 2.8 million hectares’ worth of suitable hill country that could be converted to forest. Hill country is essentially steep slopes at higher altitudes. It’s referred to as ‘marginal’ farmland because the economic gains are quite low compared to other landscapes. Steeper gradients are prone to erosion, and high-altitude climates don’t always lend themselves to agricultural productivity.

    Steep slopes at high altitudes are key characteristics of New Zealand’s hill country (own photo).

    So, how do we go about converting hill country farmland into a thriving native forest? Pedley, McWilliam, and Doscher discuss the factors that we must take into account.

    Hill country revegetation projects are tough for the same reasons as hill country farming is tough, there are costs associated with buying nursery-raised seedlings and then planting on difficult terrain. As Pedley and colleagues suggest, the cheaper alternative is to simply let nature do its thing. Allowing forests to regenerate naturally is a form of passive or minimal interference management (MIM). Landowners, especially farmers, are among the most well-placed in the country to protect and expand our country’s native forest cover, and MIM is an attractive solution to the costs.

    When it comes to revegetating farmland, Pedley and colleagues point out two major considerations.

    One difficulty is that pasture grasses often suppress native seeds from establishing, so it’s important to help the seeds get a head start. The easiest way to do this is with nurse crops, which shade out the grass, shelter the natives, and protect them from browsers (particularly possums and ungulates, like deer and goats). Nurse crops can be exotic or indigenous shrubs and trees, and even existing weeds, like gorse, can be made useful. This is because NZ natives generally prefer to start out in the shade, eventually growing tall enough to overgrow the nurse crops.

    Next is the issue of livestock that can be detrimental to natural regeneration. It does depend on which livestock species you have and which tree species are regenerating. Cattle can be extremely destructive to new plants, paddocks, and pre-existing vegetation. Sheep, on the other hand, don’t really seem to make a difference, though they tend to snack on broadleaved species that are a necessity for a healthy forest ecosystem.

    Cattle should be reduced or excluded entirely from a revegetating area. Sheep can be reduced or excluded until there are a good amount of established seedlings, which usually aren’t as palatable to them. Just don’t forget to also keep out those pesky possums and unwelcome ungulates.

    Cattle can be destructive to pastures and newly planted vegetation (“Cow Path to the Forest” by Tristan Schmurr, CC BY 2.0)

    The most important part of natural regeneration is that the seeds have to come from somewhere. This means that the existing native vegetation on your property is one of your most important assets. This is the ‘passive’ part of the process and the money-saver, because you won’t need to buy seeds or establish nurse crops – the trees have got it covered. The native trees will shade out the grass in the space directly adjacent, enabling the seeds to gain a foothold and gradually expand the forest. Fencing off this area, or the paddock the trees are in, is enough to start the process.

    A fair warning though: promoting natural regeneration with MIM can be slow, particularly through grazed pasture. Pedley and colleagues detected an annual regeneration rate of 0.2% from 2003 to 2019 at a southern Banks Peninsula station. At a time when New Zealand desperately needs to plant more trees, MIM is one of the ways landowners with limited resources can contribute, though more active management strategies will speed up the process. For example, consider pest management to exclude browsers (e.g. trapping, hunting, or fencing) and supplementary planting, especially if your remnant vegetation is limited to a few individual trees or species.

    Policy and the barriers to getting involved

    Finally, especially for those of us in the political and conservation sectors, I think it is our responsibility to encourage native tree planting among landowners, while understanding their barriers to doing so.

    The most obvious barrier in converting farmland to forestry is the loss of income, however minor it is. Landowners meeting certain land and forest requirements may be eligible to participate in the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS). With one hectare of ten-year-old forest, you might earn anything from 8-24 NZU per year, depending on the tree species. If sold at $58 per NZU, that’s an annual income of $464-$1392 per year – for essentially leaving the land alone. These figures grow as the forest matures, and with better policy, these figures could grow even more.

    Our policies currently favour exotics over natives, and plantations over constantly-regenerating forest. Not all models consider the amount of carbon stored in the forest understory, which is much denser and richer in a native forest compared to a pine forest. New evidence shows that native ecosystems store much more carbon than previously thought, and over a much greater period of time than pine species.

    Mature beech forest understory (own photo)
    Mature pine forest understory (“Mount Thomas pines” by Jon Sullivan, CC BY-NC 2.0)

    Another barrier to entry is our individualistic culture around climate change action. Many sheep and beef farmers report that pro-biodiversity action is not necessarily about a lack of resources, but the belief that their actions don’t benefit their own farms, or that they aren’t helpful in the bigger picture. It’s important that we change this mindset, because 89% of New Zealand’s emissions are created by our primary industries.

    MIM cuts costs, but adding more trees to your property and protecting them not only benefits the landowner and the immediate environment, but also the rest of the country. It benefits the natural resources on which we all rely, stabilises the landscape, and protects us from fires and droughts. Natural regeneration of natives results in improved biodiversity outcomes, with higher richness and abundance of plants, birds and invertebrates, which not only make all of this possible, but also make the system sustainable. This means that landowners can cut costs in the long run by working with nature, using its natural characteristics and processes to their advantage.

    In any case, growing a forest on a farm is not an overnight process

    It requires a lot of patience, but those who are able to encourage native regrowth are safeguarding the country’s biodiversity and resources for all of us, and contributing to our sustainability. Native forests hold a much more strategic long-term position in the bid to plant more trees, and hill country farmers are the most well-placed to allow their regeneration.

    Perhaps one day we will have the privilege of living and working alongside the lush and bustling forests that once supported us, as we learn to support them.

    Mature beech forest (own photo).

    This article was prepared by Master of Science student Sarah Gabites as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

    Based on the article by Pedley, D., McWilliam, W. and Doscher, C. (2023). Forests from the grass: natural regeneration of woody vegetation in temperate marginal hill farmland under minimum interference management. Restoration Ecology 31:3. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13852

  • The Magical World of Grass and Clover

    The Magical World of Grass and Clover

    *Disclaimer: This article contains Harry Potter references

    After four years of living and studying together, you would think you know someone pretty well. Alas, last week it turned out one of my flat mates had never seen (or read) Harry Potter… shocked, heartbroken, and outraged – the only way to solve this flat feud was to start from the beginning and watch Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone.

    The next day, it was back to study. However, I couldn’t get the wizarding world out of my mind, especially knowing that the second movie, the Chamber of Secrets, was scheduled for that night. It got me thinking. Every hero has a sidekick. Batman and Robin, Frodo and Sam, Harry and Ron. But what if these iconic heroes don’t only exist in the worlds of Gotham City, Middle-earth, or Hogwarts. What if the heroes on this earth have sidekicks too?

    Legumes (like clovers) are heroes. Destined for greatness and capable of incredible things, they can capture nitrogen (N) from the atmosphere and convert it into ammonia, a biological form of nitrogen that fuels the ecosystem. Farmers often incorporate clovers into their pastures to provide nitrogen into the system. Because of their magic-like nitrogen capturing abilities, clovers boost the growth of neighbouring grasses and create an increase in food quality and quantity for grazing animals.

    White Clover (Trifolium repens). CC BY 2.0. Harry Rose

    It is generally understood that this is a one-way relationship, meaning clovers are humble heroes that provide N to the grasses and plants surrounding them. However, through my muggle research, I came across a recent study titled “Grasses procure key soil nutrients for clovers” by PhD student Zhang Wei.

    Could it be? A sidekick to our green three-leaf (sometimes four if you’re lucky) hero?

    Wei and his team questioned whether we properly understand the relationship between clovers and grasses. For the purpose of this article, let’s think of clovers and grasses as characters to understand better their relationship and how they work together.

    Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne). CC BY-SA 4.0. Michel Langeveld

    Different plant species have various magic-like abilities to acquire nutrients. Grasses, for example, are potion makers and can release chemical substances into the soil to make elements such as iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and manganese(Mn) more available in the soil. Other plants call on the Room of Requirement and collaborate with fungi to increase access to nutrients through the fungal networks. Like how the Room of Requirement appears for those who need it most, fungi create symbiotic relationships with plants, enabling more nutrients to ‘appear’ and become more accessible in the soil. And clovers, as you now know, use their spellwork to fix atmospheric nitrogen (N).

    However, just like the spell “Wing-gar-dium Levi-o-sa” requires a certain pronunciation, N fixation requires a certain nutrient – phosphorus. Phosphorus is a nutrient constantly in high demand for clovers due to N fixation being such a taxing process.

    Zhang Wei and his research team carried out experiments to better understand how grasses influence the nutrient availability for clovers. Clovers and grasses were grown separately in individual pots, much like Harry living alone in the cupboard under the stairs. They were also grown together in shared pots, similar to Harry and Ron bunking together at Hogwarts. Measurements were then taken from the soil and leaves in all the pots to understand how the clovers and grasses influence each other’s growth.

    The researchers found that grasses promoted the growth of clovers when grown together. This was evident when higher amounts of nutrients such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and sulphur (S) were found in clover leaves growing with grasses compared to clovers that grew alone. Grasses give clovers a boost in accessing essential nutrients, much like how Ron supports Harry, offering the strength and loyalty he needs to face He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named.

    Mixed sward of White Clover (Trifolium repens) and pasture grasses growing together. Nicole Parnell. 2025.

    Additionally, more biomass was achieved when both clovers and grasses were grown together compared to when they were grown apart. How would Harry have gotten through his years at Hogwarts without his friends by his side? They achieve more when they work together. By sharing their resources, the plants could increase their biomass, which boosts livestock feed while lowering fertiliser demand.

    The muggle authors acknowledge that more research is needed to fully understand the complexities of how nutrients move through the soil in plant communities like this, especially under field conditions. In 2023, Zhang Wei and his supervisors took the study into the field and, once again, saw enhanced legume growth when grown alongside a diverse range of pasture grass species. Think of Harry’s resilience and leadership, Ron’s loyalty and humour, and Hermione’s intelligence and discipline, all of which work together to create a strong, unbeatable partnership. Similarly, there is an enhancement of nutrient uptake in diverse pastures with legumes (including native legumes) and grasses. This suggests a possible reduction in fertiliser requirements in pastures with increased plant diversity.

    A study that referenced Zhang Wei’s work similarly found that plant mixtures with various legume and grass species reduced intraspecific competition, a term that explains competition between individuals of the same species (think Gryffindor vs Slytherin). This means that the growth and productivity of both legumes and grasses were further enhanced when grown together.

    Zhang Wei’s PhD study provided further insights into the flow of nutrients within plant communities, demonstrating that grasses also play a vital role in nutrient availability and enhancement. This study builds on the argument that pasture diversity can reduce reliance on artificial fertilisers and promote sustainable farming methods. These methods can increase the ecosystem’s stability, making it more resilient to disturbances such as droughts and/or floods. Like any partnership, growing together makes them stronger.

    That’s where the magic happens.

    This article was prepared by Master of Science student Nicole Parnell as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

  • Enemies with benefits

    Enemies with benefits

    The idea of ‘friends with benefits’ is reasonably widespread and understood. Having good interactions with others will often lead to even more productive outcomes. But what about ‘enemies with benefits’? Are there times where your enemy can give you some positive benefits?

    Invasive species cause ecological harm worldwide, threatening biodiversity, disrupting nutrient cycling and displacing native species. Pacific islands, with their characteristically high rates of endemism, experience out-sized effects from plant invasions (Bellard et al. 2014). In biodiversity hotspots, such as New Zealand, exotic invasive plant species now outnumber native species in area and in number.

    But, how do they do it?

    New Zealand habitats are prone to invasion by exotic plant species. Why is this?

    A study by Lauren Waller and other Lincoln University and University of Canterbury colleagues, published in Journal of Ecology attempts to find some answers. Lauren shows that exotic plants may gain their competitive edge by accumulating enemies in the soil and sharing them with neighbouring native plants, a phenomenon that plant ecologists call pathogen spillover.

    Lauren set up a large mesocosm (self-contained area) experiment. These were areas where new species could be added to a known group of native species in a very manageable process. The health and growth of all plants could be measured and microorganisms both present at the start and brought in on the introduced plants could be identified.

    Lauren expected exotic plants to experience improved growth due to escape from pathogens (leaving the burden of enemies behind when they come to NZ). This assumption comes in large part from two well-known hypotheses, the Enemy Release Hypothesis and the Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability (EICA) Hypothesis. Enemy Release states that exotic plants can gain incredible success when they move to a new location lacking the enemy pressure they experienced in their home range, particularly co-evolved specialist enemies. EICA goes a step further to suggest that if exotic plants can escape enemy pressure in their new range, those plants will have more resources to allocate to growth over defence.

    Somewhat supporting Enemy Release, exotic plants did not appear to suffer much from specialist fungal pathogens. However, exotic plants did associate with generalist pathogens. Also, in support of Enemy Release, exotic plants did not appear to allocate resources to defence. Instead, exotic plants appeared to tolerate generalist pathogen pressure without reducing their growth.

    Native Poa grown in a native versus exotic dominated plot.

    Lauren did not expect to see big impacts by exotic plants on native plants, and boy, did they! Native plants just wasted away when grown with exotic plants. It was very sad to watch. This photo shows an example of a native bunch-grass, grown with all native neighbours (left) or in communities dominated by exotic plants (right).

    What explained the out-sized effect of exotic plants on native plant growth? Our network analysis showed that exotics not only accumulated and tolerated generalist pathogens, but they shared their pathogens with native plants. Native plants did not appear to have the same tolerance for this enemy pressure like the exotic plants did. 

    We started by asking ‘are there times where your enemy can give you some positive benefits?’. It turns out that yes there are times when your enemies can help you a lot. In this case if species cause you problems it will be OK for you if they cause competing species even more problems! With invasive species, your microbial enemies can do you a good turn but taking out the opposition.

    Now that’s a real enemy with benefits!

    Lauren Waller and Adrian Paterson wrote this together (and not as enemies!). They are lecturers in the Department of Pest-management and Conservation.

    Bellard, C., Leclerc, C., Leroy, B., Bakkenes, M., Veloz, S., Thuiller, W., & Courchamp, F. (2014). Vulnerability of biodiversity hotspots to global change. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 23(12), 1376-1386

  • Wine is changing with the times

    For thousands of years, humans have been indulging in the pleasures of alcohol. It is one of the few pastimes that run throughout the history of civilisation. But what did wine taste like without the modern technologies we have today? In the modern day world, wine may be described as somewhat spicy, smelling of roasted walnuts, apples, toasted bread, and curry, with a very dry and sappy mouth feeling.

    Figure 1. A glass of NZ red wine (Photo by Evan Wood)

    Romans would often add herbs, spices, honey, or saltwater before drinking the wine, to experiment with flavour and medicinal properties. As humans became more advanced in the production, storage, and fermentation of grapes, we created more delicate wines with sophisticated flavour profiles, aromas, and textures.

    In the modern world of wine, terroir reigns supreme. This French term encapsulates the unique combination of soil, climate, and topography that imparts distinct characteristics to wine. These terroir factors affect many viticultural practices, such as fruit ripeness, maturation, and harvest dates, which have a direct impact on the quality of wine.

    While much attention is given to the climate and grapes themselves, an equally critical yet often overlooked aspect of winemaking, is the role of microbial communities. Fermentation is at the heart of winemaking, where grape juice transforms into wine through the action of yeasts and lactic acid bacteria. These microorganisms are present within the grape must, the natural, freshly pressed grape juice.

    Figure 2. Landscape of a vineyard located in Marlborough, New Zealand (Photo by Bernard Spragg)

    The yeasts break down sugars to ethanol (alcoholic fermentation), which encourages lactic acid bacteria growth. These bacteria then begin the malolactic fermentation process, where they convert malic acid to lactic acid. Not only do these microorganisms liberate the aromas and flavour profile of the grapes, but they are the tiny soldiers that help give you a little, or large, buzz. So next time you drink a glass of wine or alcoholic beverage, give a toast to these yeasts and bacteria.

    Many winemakers choose to select conventional, commercial strains of microbes for fermentation to ensure gold-standard wine, rather than risk the potential of rotten grape juice. Others opt for spontaneous fermentation, which relies on naturally occurring microorganisms on the skin of grapes or in the environment (air or soil). In such vineyards that use spontaneous fermentation, the diversity, abundance, and role of these microbes are crucial in the development and quality of the wine.

    Figure 3. A barrel of grape must + microbes (Photo by benmacaskill)

    As climate change reshapes our environment, its impact on these microscopic winemakers becomes a fascinating field of study. Dr Aghogho Ohwofasa’s work explores the variation of microbial populations between different vintage years on the same block of a vineyard that consistently uses an organic approach.

    Between vintage years and geographical regions, the climate, such as average temperature, relative humidity, and rainfall that a vineyard receives varies. Climatic variation influences the vintage effect, which is used to describe the variation in yield, quality, and typicality of both grapes and wine from year to year.

    The purpose of Aghogho’s study was to figure out which climatic factors varied between the 2018 vintage and 2021 vintage and how that variation influenced the bacterial and fungal communities present. The first step was to select two areas of the vineyard for each vintage that had the same shared location and would experience the same weather.

    Figure 4. Vineyard near Waipara, North Canterbury (Photo by Vjpaul)

    Next, the microbial communities were compared between each vintage year. Samples were taken from the grape juice at four important fermentation time points. These were the start of fermentation, two times during the process of fermentation, and the end of fermentation. The detection of the yeasts and bacteria in the samples was achieved through metabarcoding, which is able to detect and sequence the DNA of all the organisms present in the sample.

    The results from Aghogho’s study indicated that the diversity and abundance of bacterial and fungal communities varied between the 2018 and 2021 vintage years. The bacterial community and composition of the 2018 vintage had 56 genera (groups of species) that were uniquely present in that particular year and showcased much greater diversity when compared to the 2021 vintage, with only 17 genera.

    In spontaneous wine fermentation, Saccharomyces yeast species typically predominate due to their specific adaptive traits, which give them competitive advantages over other yeast species. The graph below in Figure 6 shows that Saccharomyces yeasts made up 53% and 46% of the yeast species in 2018 and 2021 respectively.

    Figure 5. Relative abundance of bacterial communities between 2018 and 2021 vintage (Data from Aghogho Ohwofasa)

    Other dominant yeast species included Auerobasidium, Hanseniaspora, Stramerella, and Metschnikowia. Despite the dominance of Saccharomyces within the 2018 and 2020 vintage, there was variation between other yeast species, namely Stramerella (2018 vintage) and Metschnikowia (2021 vintage).

    Inevitably each year, a batch of grapes will have a unique profile of microorganisms that influence the development of the wine. But since different yeasts unlock different aromas, what risks may vineyards be facing due to these changing populations?

    The dominant lactic acid bacteria involved in winemaking include the Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc, and Oenococcus genera. The activity of these bacteria can modify the wines appearance, flavour, aroma, and texture, as well as reduce its acidity.

    Figure 6. Relative abundance of yeast communities between 2018 and 2021 vintage (Data from Aghogho Ohwofasa)

    Most of the bacteria present in Aghogho’s study are common and expected throughout the wine regions of the world. They have also been extensively studied, and their contribution to the winemaking process well-known.

    The Tatumella genera, which was overly abundant (61%) within the 2021 vintage but had less than 2% abundance in the 2018 vintage, is much less studied. So how might this organism be affecting the quality of wine between these two seasons? This is a question that we simply don’t know the answer to.

    Dr Aghogho Ohwofasa and colleagues’ work highlights that climatic variables, such as temperature, rainfall, and relative humidity, influence the bacterial differences that occurred between the 2018 and 2021 vintage. Rainfall and humidity were key variables driving the populations of bacterial and fungal communities within the 2018 vintage, whilst maximum temperature had a large influence in the 2021 vintage.

    Different species and strains of yeasts and bacteria can contribute to the sensory characteristics of wine, which may be beneficial or detrimental to the quality of wine. So, what does this mean for wine making worldwide?

    We don’t fully understand the extent to which these ‘wild’ microbes play a role in affecting the flavour profiles and aromas within our wines. Will climate change disturb the composition and abundance of these microscopic winemakers that will ultimately impact the taste of our wines? If so, how do we protect our wine from changing with the times?

    This article was prepared by Bachelor of Agricultural Science with Honours student Charlotte Tinsley as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

    Reference:

    Ohwofasa A, Dhami M, Zhang J, Tian B, Winefield C, et al. (2024) Influence of climatic variation on microbial communities during organic Pinot noir wine production. PLOS ONE 19(2): e0296859. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296859

  • Creeks spread invasive herbs in New Zealand

    Invasive plants can have a devastating impact on our natural environment.

    What are invasive plants? Put simply, they are non-native plants that spread rapidly within New Zealand and pose a significant threat to ecosystems, agricultural production, or human health. It sounds awful.It is even worse than it sounds.

    Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) CC BY by Chris Schnepf, University of Idaho, Bugwood.org

    Invasive plants pose a threat to natural ecosystems as they are often highly competitive compared to native plants. Invasive species also spread rapidly to take over the living space of native plants, alter ecosystem structures, and reduce biodiversity.

    Many exotic plants are invasive, such as lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) and Scotch thistle (Cirsium vulgare). Invasive plants change the composition of plant communities and affect food webs and ecosystem balance. For example, the introduction of eucalyptus alters soil chemistry and moisture content, affecting the survival of other plants and animals (Mengistu, 2022).

    Invasive plants also impact agriculture and grazing and can cause massive economic damage. Scotch thistle (Cirsium vulgare) can quickly spread and take over farmland, reducing crop yields. Unpalatable invasive plants can compete with pasture grasses, reducing the area of grassland available for grazing and affecting livestock husbandry (Massey Universy).

    Scotch thistle (Cirsium vulgare) CC BY by John Barkla,  

    Some exotic plants are harmful to human healthy, like Giant Hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum),  which can cause third-degree burns and even blindness by simply touching it!

    Knowing how invasive plants spread can help us to control them effectively. A study conducted at Lincoln University in 2013 focused on whether creek habitats are a source of spread for these invasive plants.

    Researchers from Lincoln University (Alice Miller and colleagues) studied Hieracium lepidulum (Asteraceae), an invasive herbaceous plant that has proliferated in the South Island in recent decades. It now occurs in a wide range of upland habitats, from improved short tussock grasslands, to intact beech forests, to alpine herbaceous fields. Hieracium is a more shade-tolerant relative of the widespread pasture hawkeed.

    Historical data suggests that Hieracium is common in naturally disturbed habitats, such as stream edges and forest canopy gaps. Alice selected creek catchments in the area with the longest known history of  H. lepidulum invasion in New Zealand:  Craigieburn Forest Park on the eastern side of the Southern Alps, Canterbury, New Zealand. She surveyed 1,144 spots along 17 creek catchments.

    Giant Hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum). CBS News

    Alice and colleagues found that creek habitats (e.g., stream edges and disturbed areas) play an important source role in the dispersal of H. lepidulum. These areas tend to be subject to more natural and human-caused disturbances, which provide a suitable growing environment for  H. lepidulum, and contribute to its rapid reproduction and accumulation in these areas.

    The high resource availability and frequency of disturbance at stream edges allow H. lepidulum to colonise and spread rapidly. Disturbed areas, such as forest clearings and trail edges, provide similarly favourable conditions. Stream habitats provide connected linear dispersal paths that allow H. lepidulum to spread rapidly along streams and from there into neighbouring areas.

    The dispersal patterns of H. lepidulum in forests and subalpine areas were found to differ. In forests, the dense canopy and ground vegetation form a natural barrier to the spread of this plant. As a result, the density of H. lepidulum in forests decreases rapidly with increasing distance from creeks, except in areas with higher light availability, such as tree-fall gaps.

    Forested areas near creek edges remain vulnerable to invasion. In contrast, in subalpine habitats, H. lepidulum density declined more gently with increasing distance from creeks. This suggests that these areas are less restricted to seed dispersal corridors and more susceptible to invasion.

    Location of study area with the 17 surveyed creeks in bold and indicated by an asterisk. From Google Map

    The study also found that multiple environmental variables had an effect on H. lepidulum abundance, with dense canopy cover reducing light and inhibiting its growth. Areas closer to stream mouths were usually more frequently disturbed and H. lepidulum abundance was relatively higher. Higher elevation areas pose a challenge to H. lepidulum growth due to harsher climatic conditions, but the invasion is still significant in subalpine areas. Disturbances, such as human activities, increase the chances of reproduction and dispersal of H. lepidulum.

    Alice provided several recommendations for managing and conserving areas affected by H. lepidulum. First, she suggested prioritising efforts to limit the spread of this invasive plant by reducing disturbances in the environment and using biological control methods. Second, she recommended setting up monitoring systems in vulnerable subalpine habitats to detect and control H. lepidulum early and prevent it from forming large populations. Finally, while disturbances are natural in these ecosystems, it is important for managers to consider the additional impact of human activities, such as building roads and trails, which can exacerbate the invasion, especially in subalpine areas where the barriers to invasion are lower.

    Hieracium lepidulum Stenstr. (Asteraceae).CC BY by John Barkla

    Through this study, we have gained valuable insights into the dispersal patterns and environmental impacts of the invasive plant H. lepidulum. This hardy invader tends to thrive along creek margins and in disturbed areas, making these locations hotspots for its spread. It is our responsibility to protect these pristine landscapes from invasive species.

    If you’re hiking in New Zealand’s stunning mountains, keep an eye out for those little H. lepidulum spreading on the sly. Let’s be the guardians of nature and protect this pristine land from these “little invaders” that are taking over our ecosystem.We can help preserve the natural beauty and biodiversity of New Zealand’s ecosystems, ensuring that these “little invaders” do not take over and disrupt the delicate balance of our environment.

    This article was prepared by Master of Pest Management postgraduate student Hao Zhang as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

    References:

    Mengistu, B., Amayu, F., Bekele, W., & Dibaba, Z. (2022). Effects of Eucalyptus species plantations and crop land on selected soil properties. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes, 6(4), 277-285. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/24749508.2020.1833627

    Miller, A. L., Wiser, S. K., Sullivan, J. J., & Duncan, R. P. (2015). Creek habitats as sources for the spread of an invasive herb in a New Zealand mountain landscape. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 39(1), 71-78. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26198696

    massey.ac.nz/about/colleges-schools-and-institutes/college-of-sciences/our-research/themes-and-research-strengths/plant-science-research/new-zealand-weeds-database/scotch-thistle/

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/giant-hogweed-plant-causes-blindness-third-degree-burns-discovered-in-virginia-other-states/

  • Fire-resisting superpowers in plants

    I don’t know what you like to eat at barbecues, but I like some nice roasted veggies! What I don’t fancy are burned broccoli or charred cauliflower. Who would want to eat that, right? Do you have an idea what causes huge amounts of burnt veggies each year? It’s wildfires!

    Seasoned vegetables,
    by polaristest (Flickr)

    With 8-11% of wildfires globally occurring on agricultural land you can imagine that these cause a lot of unenjoyable vegetables. Agricultural wildfires mostly derive from accidental ignition from machinery use or through the escape of fires initially deliberately lit for management purposes. Because 38% of land worldwide is used for grazing and cropping, there is a lot of potential for fire, which highlights the importance of reducing the fire risk to secure our major food sources.

    We don’t have to go far to realise the significance of this topic, as Canterbury accounts for around 20% of New Zealand’s total farmland, roughly 2,600,000 hectares of land. That is about the size of 3,700,000 rugby fields! Canterbury has a climate characterised by low precipitation and dry winds, good ingredients for an easily flammable outdoor barbecue.

    Local wildfires take away many people’s chance to roast their veggies themselves as well as causing a huge amount of economic and ecological loss. But what if we could use farmland for fire prevention? What if some crops actually had the superpower to fight against wildfires, or at least survive them?

    Canterbury NZ, by Simon (Flickr)

    There is a lot of information on how to plant mindfully, using low-flammability plants to create buffer zones that allow us to keep wildfires under control and stop them from spreading. Those ‘green fire breaks’ were tactically planted after the Port Hill fires in 2017 to prevent history from repeating itself. As green fire breaks can only help reduce the impact of wildfires to some extent, planting smart on farmland might add to the best practice, especially in fire-prone areas like Canterbury.

    That is exactly what was tested in a study by Lincoln University in 2023. Masters student Tanmayi Pagadala, with colleagues Azhar Alam, Tom Maxwell, and Tim Curran, tested 47 different agricultural plants for their flammability superpowers, following a simple recipe.

    Ingredients:
    – 47 different shoots and plants of the following groups: cereal crops, forage crops, fruit trees, grazing forbs, pasture grasses, weeds, pasture legumes, vegetables, and wine grapes.

    Utensils:
    – Infrared laser thermometer
    – Lighter
    – Plant barbecue (“a 44 gallon drum cut in half with a grill on top”) 

    Plant barbecue
    (Image by Hanna Hoeffner)

    Instructions:
    – Heat the grill by turning on the burner (125-199 °C)
    – Place your sample on the grill in a horizontal position and leave for 2 minutes
    – Turn on the blowtorch for 10 seconds to ignite the sample
    – Wait until the plant stops burning

    Following this recipe, one can evaluate the ignition time, the maximum temperature reached, the burning time, and how much of the sample was burned.

    After many days of barbecues, Tanmayi’s team was able to tell which plants have the superpower to resist fires better than others. Fruits and cereal crops had significantly higher flammability compared to vegetables, weeds, winegrapes, forage crops, grazing herbs, pasture grasses and legumes. Or, to make it more understandable, easily flammable crops dry faster, are generally dryer, and retain more dead material. Veggie superheroes were bell peppers, spring onions, and potatoes.

    Tanmayi’s team created “A fire-wise mixed cropping farm system” as a guideline for purposeful planting on farmland. The idea of fire-wise cropping is similar to green fire breaks. Using low-flammability native tree, grass and legume species as boundaries around higher flammable crops. 

    Broccoloid, by CaptainEdawardTeague (deviantart)

    Higher flammability species are then protected from wildfires that start outside of the farmland and also prevent fires started on the farm from spreading to neighbouring properties. While you must consider other factors, like local environmental conditions, economics, and goals like enhancing biodiversity, this approach can add to existing green fire breaks. By redesigning farms, we can utilise the fire-resistant superpowers of some species to safely plant non-super-powered plants and minimise increasing the wildfire risk.

    Even though this research was conducted in New Zealand, many of the species tested are common crops worldwide. Therefore, their superpowers could come in handy in many places with continuously increasing fire risks, putting veggies at the forefront of the fight against wildfires!

    This article was prepared by Master of International Nature Conservation student Hanna Hoeffner as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

    Pagadala, T., Alam, M. A., Maxwell, T. M., & Curran, T. J. (2024). Measuring flammability of crops, pastures, fruit trees, and weeds: A novel tool to fight wildfires in agricultural landscapes. Science of the Total Environment, 906, 167489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167489

  • Fighting fire with farming: flammability of pastures and crops

    The Port Hills are a highly valued geographical feature of Chirstchurch. Located southeast of the city, they are home to a wide range of activities, including rock climbing and mountain biking, as well as being popular among walkers and joggers. Vegetation throughout the Port Hills is varied, containing a range of tussockland, pine forestry blocks, native scrub, farmed grassland, gorse and broom scrub and small pockets of remnant forest.

    On the 14th of February 2024, over 700 hectares of land was ravaged by wildfire in the Port Hills of Christchurch, New Zealand. Over 80 residents were evacuated, and around 130 firefighters with 12 helicopters were involved. Drought conditions and vegetation structure contributed to this event, but could the damage caused by the blaze have been reduced? Could grazing these hills with livestock have reduced the amount of tall dry grass present which fuelled the fire, or could different pasture or shrub species have helped to reduce the flammability of the Port Hills.

    A recent paper from Lincoln University’s own Tanmayi Pagadala, Azharul Alam, Tim Curran and Tom Maxwell has highlighted the differences in flammability between different pasture, crop, weed and shrub species found commonly on farms throughout Canterbury.

    Marley’s Hill on fire. February 15 2024. (Image CC BY-NC by Jon Sullivan)

    A good range of scientific work is available which has investigated the flammability of various plant species in New Zealand, but this has been mainly focused on species in natural areas (both native and exotic), rather than in agricultural environments. Gorse, eucalypts, pines and long grass are well known to be extremely flammable, so why is it that certain areas of the port hills were allowed to return to their same fuel rich state following the 2017 blaze which destroyed over 1600 hectares? It must be acknowledged that efforts were made to replant some of the previously burnt areas in green firebreaks and others in less flammable native species, which were shown to survive the previous blaze in well-established areas.

    Species that regrow following a fire are often also very flammable (eg. gorse and pine). Unfortunately, a significant proportion of the burned land was in pines for forestry, which has since been replanted and will likely create another significant fire risk for the foreseeable future. Continuing the efforts of plant firebreaks of less flammable tree species throughout the Port Hills, as well as within pine forestry blocks, should not be underestimated.

    Individually these breaks may not appear significant, but a thorough network of them throughout the Port Hills could be exactly what is needed to slow the spread of the next blaze and allow firefighters to gain control sooner. Minimising the presence of long, rank grass could also help to slow the spread of the burn.

    Could additional efforts be made in to reducing the presence of long rank grass through the addition of cattle to grazed areas which would trample and eat this dry plant material? Or perhaps planting more drought tolerant, water-efficient forages which can be grazed down during dry periods to minimise the fuel loading of grasslands could be beneficial.

    Dry, rank grass fuelling the blaze on Christchurch’s Port Hills. (Image CC BY Francis Vallance)

    There is a huge range of flammability in different crop and pasture species common to Canterbury farming systems. Assessments carried out on Lincoln University’s trusty ‘plant BBQ’ tested 47 different plant species and varieties common throughout Canterbury farms (see table below), including cereals, forage crops, fruit crops, forage herbs, forage grasses, forage legumes, vegetable crops, weeds and a range of wine grape varieties.

    Unsurprisingly, the majority of forage and pasture species showed very low flammability, as did some vegetable crops and wine grapes. Cereal crops behaved as expected, showing high flammability as they matured and dried off. Surprisingly, apple trees, pears and raspberries showed a high degree of flammability.

    Table of plant species and their relative flammability assessed by Pagadala and colleagues

    The slope of the Port Hills, and an average annual rainfall of 700 mm, means that using low flammability crops like potatoes or peas is not practical. There are, however, a range of pastoral species that show the potential to be beneficial in reducing the flammability of farmland. Forage crops, herbs, legumes and grasses all showed very low flammability scores, which is due to their high moisture content and quality traits meaning they carry very little dead material (the ideal fuel for fires).

    Knowing these flammability scores in addition to the the drought tolerant traits of species, such as lucerne, cocksfoot, red clover, plantain and chicory, raises the question: why are these species currently not implemented throughout the fire prone Port Hills as a method of reducing fire risk? Yes, these forages will become flammable if they are allowed to turn to a reproductive state. However, their drought tolerance and palatability will allow them to be well grazed during dry periods and not contribute to the fuel loading of hills anywhere near the amount that browntop and other native grasses will.

    Chicory next to native pasture in Taranaki. (© Blake Gunn – used with permission)

    The photos above paint a picture of a potential solution to the Port Hills fire woes. At the very least, an effort should be made to ensure that flammable biomass throughout the Port Hills is minimal. Minimising the presence of flammable species, such as gorse and pines, through manual removal or switching to planting less-flammable alternatives, such as native shrubs, are some potential solutions.

    Preventing the planting of pine plantations near the city and other populated areas seems like another fairly logical solution to reducing the fire risk in populated areas, as does surrounding these potential high-risk areas with low flammability and native shrub species. Another area of focus could be to focus more on the management of cattle and/or sheep to intensively graze the hillsides and ensure that a bank of highly flammable fuel does not build up over time. Intensive grazing will not only prevent grass banks from building up, but the ‘hoof and tooth’ activity from grazing may also prevent other flammable species, such as gorse and broom, from re-establishing.

    Lucerne transforming a Central Otago farm system (© Allister Moorhead – used with permission)

    Functional firebreaks could also be of huge benefit to these hillsides. In areas where tractor access is possible, consideration should be given to the establishment of drought-tolerant, low-flammability species, such as red clover, chicory, or lucerne. These will create ‘green zones’ throughout the hillsides that could slow the spread of the next inevitable fire, especially compared to the current vegetation which is prone to turning to a dry, reproductive state over summer.

    To wrap up, logic suggests that previous fires in 2017 and 2024 on the Port Hills, in combination with the presence of flammable vegetation, make another blaze in the future almost inevitable. The findings from recent research on the flammability of pasture and crop species commonly found on Canterbury farms, combined with modern grazing regimes present a real opportunity to significantly reduce the fire risk on the Port Hills. The use of firebreaks planted with native, low flammability species around high risk areas such as pine forestry blocks, along with the protection of existing pockets of native scrub/forest should also help to reduce the fire risk on the Port Hills.

    This article was prepared by Master of Science postgraduate student Kaylee Spain as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

    Reference article:
    Pagadala, T., Alam, M. A., Maxwell, T., & Curran, T. (2023). Measuring flammability of crops, pastures, fruit trees, and weeds: A novel tool to fight wildfires in agricultural landscapes. Science of the total environment, 906(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167489

  • Dirty little secrets or tiny heroes of the soil world?

    Dirt was one of my first friends. My earliest days were spent collecting worms from the backyard and trying to convince my parents I hadn’t done any dirt taste testing that day (I probably had, but for purely scientific reasons). I was fascinated by what seemed like an entirely different world in the soil of my parent’s garden. I could find all kinds of goodies from insects to plant roots.

    At university I was introduced to the truly magical world in soil: microbes. Although not visible to the naked eye, the tiny worlds inhabited by fungi, bacteria, viruses, and other unbelievably small things, should not be overlooked. These tiny worlds are called the microbial community and they have important roles in New Zealand forests.

    Photo of soil microbes under a microscope. Photo by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (CC-BY-NC-SA 2.0)

    A good place to start thinking about microbial communities is our own bodies. Most people have heard of their gut microbiome. The microbes in our digestive system are important for our health from immune function to digestion (especially for dirt tasters). However, some microbes, such as the COVID-19 virus, can make us sick. Soil microbes in forests are not so different.

    Forests are dependent on microbes that cycle nutrients, decompose waster, and aid plants in nutrient uptake. Like humans and the common cold, some soil microbes hurt their associated plants. An example of this is kauri dieback disease, a disease spread by a spore in the soil that attacks tree roots and trunks. This disease hinders the tree’s ability to uptake and transport nutrients, essentially starving and killing the tree. Kauri dieback is incurable and fatal for kauri.

    Tāne Mahuta, the largest surviving kauri. Photo by Jodie Wiltse (Author)

    Kauri dieback is named after the tree it infects, New Zealand’s mighty kauri tree. The Department of Conservation explains that kauri can grow up to 16 m in circumference and live over 2000 years. The legendary status of kauri is clear in the language used to describe them. The largest surviving kauri is called Tāne Mahuta, which means ‘lord of the forest’. If you were to visit Tāne Mahuta today, you would find boot cleaning stations, warning signs, and only be able to view the great tree from a platform. Moreso, entire trails have been shutdown to stop people from spreading soil around kauri. Why?

    A soil microbe, Phytophthora agathidicida, travels under the name of kauri dieback. This microbe cannot be seen with the naked eye but has the power to kill tremendously large kauri trees. In humans, the heroic microbes of our immune system save us when nasty microbes make us sick. Are there unseen heroes hiding in the soil that can help kauri?

    During a PhD project at Lincoln University, Dr. Alexa Byers studied soil microbial communities under kauri to find out. The goal was to identify microbes that suppress kauri dieback and can aid in kauri conservation.

    The first step was to understand how microbial communities under kauri react to kauri dieback disease. Alexa infected kauri seedlings with kauri dieback and looked for changes in the soil microbial community. When humans are attacked by illness causing microbes, our immune system amps up to protect us. When soils were infected, Alexa found bacteria that were involved in disease suppression. This was a promising result suggesting that heroic soil microbes could build up their numbers to fight off kauri dieback.

    Kauri tree bleeding resin, a common symptom of kauri dieback disease. Photo by Onco p53 (CC BY-SA 4.0).

    Next, Alexa looked into how specific strains of bacteria from kauri soil impacted the development of kauri dieback. She identified Paraburkholderia and Penicillium microbes that inhibited the growth of kauri dieback in soils. Paraburkholderia are known to enhance plant growth and fix nitrogen. Penicillium are fungi that can kill or stop growth of other bacteria. We officially have some heroic contenders!

    The battles between heroic microbes and kauri dieback in the soil could determine the fate of the kauri above them. Hopefully, researchers can find a way to rig microbial battles in favour of these unseen heroes. More research is needed to determine their true potential, but these soil microbes could be called to action in the near future.

    The world under kauri is just one example of fascinating soil microbes. Soil microbes have been found to be key for carbon storage, impact the taste of tea, and reduce nitrogen runoff from agriculture, among many other amazing things. This is your reminder to appreciate the little things, even the things so little you cannot see them. Next time you play in a garden or walk through a forest, I hope you take a moment to think about all the tiny microbes working away in the soil to help (or hinder) plants and make the natural world work.

    This article was prepared by Master of International Nature Conservation student Jodie Wiltse as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

    Research Paper: Byers, A.K. (2021). The soil microbiota associated with New Zealand’s kauri (Agathis australis) forests under threat from dieback disease: A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Lincoln University. Lincoln University. https://hdl.handle.net/10182/13887

  • Thistle do me: a fussy biocontrol beetle

    My mother makes a great liver and bacon. Like many cooks who have spent decades on a sheep farm she is also a dab hand with a great mutton roast, scones, and sponge cakes. She can also preserve fruit at a moments notice. The highest compliment I every received for my own infrequent cooking attempts was from my son when I made some excellent gravy – “Well, he is Nanny’s son” he explained. Family feasts around birthdays and Christmas are common at my mother’s house.

    Edith’s fish pie

    One curious dish that makes an appearance amongst the roast veggies and mint sauce is a dish of fish pie. It’s not a typical part of most peoples’ ‘event dining’ but it is a regular for us in amongst the more high flying hams and legs of lamb. Mum’s humble fish pie is tasty, with lots of eggs and white sauce, and the right amount of rice and corn. More impressively, my sons, my nieces and nephews also love it.

    When someone needs a perk up, they’ve been unwell, or they are passing through on their way to a cold, old student flat, a bowl of Nanny’s fish pie will arrive. When there are lots of different options on a laden table, there is always room on your plate for the fish pie.

    Family gathering, three brothers, empty fish pie dish in centre!

    I can understand how I like it, I’ve been eating it all of my life. I guess it is the same for the grandchildren. It’s a constant and comforting food. I’m sure that every family probably has a similar dish.

    How ingrained are food preferences? Do we build them up over a lifetime of experience or do we arrive with inherited preferences? Perhaps a bit of both? It can make a difference.

    Thistles, from the Cardueae tribe, have been introduced into New Zealand, mostly by mistake as passengers with more useful seeds. Like many other species, thistles have done well here and have established in large numbers and with wide distributions. One of the worst is the Californian thistle (Cirsium arvense), close relative of a nearly as successful invader, and a little more photogenic, Scotch thistle (Cirsium vulgare).

    There have been many attempts to control the spread of these thistles with varying, but generally unsuccessful, outcomes. Ideally, it is great to have a solution that can work without too much effort on our part. A successful biocontrol agent can fit that prescription.

    The green thistle beetle (Cassida rubiginosa) forages and lays eggs for their larvae to grow on species from the Cardueae tribe. This creates problems for health and survival of these plants. Excellent, a solution to our prickly problem!

    Cirsium

    Not so fast. Cardueae is a large group (over 2400 species with many natives in New Zealand). The last thing that we need is a beetle that chomps up lots of the species that we are trying to protect. We also don’t want a beetle that gets distracted by eating other species when it should be eating the target. We’ve been there and done that (see the mustelids brought into NZ to eat the rabbits! Oops). We need to know that this beetle is a little more fussy in its likes.

    A Lincoln-based group, including Jon Sullivan from Pest-management and Conservation, have tested the preferences of the green thistle beetle. They have published in Pest Management Science. They selected 16 different plant species from the Cardueae tribe. Beetles were given the chance to eat each species either with no choice (plonk the beetles on a plant and see what they do) or choice (allow them to select between any pair that is presented to them).

    Crucially, the evolutionary relationships were known between the different plant species. Ideally we want the beetles to only eat thistle species of interest and not just anything vaguely similar (just those that are closely related).

    Green thistle beetle samples in Lincoln University Entomology Research Museum.

    When given no choice the beetles tended to make the best of what was offered. When you are really hungry then that marmalade is edible even if you don’t like it! Give the beetle a choice, however, and they go for the species that is most closely related to the Cirsium species. In fact this was such a strong preference that the researchers were able to conclude that the green thistle beetle is very unlikely to become a problem for anything other than the thistles that we want to control.

    The green thistle beetles are born with preferences for the type of plant that they want to eat and to lay their larvae in. These preferences allow them to adapt and specialise more fully to these plant species. New Zealand does not have any native Cirsium, or other closely related species. So the beetle can go forth and munch to their hearts’ content.

    So, was I born with a hankering for mum’s fish pie? Well it is an old family recipe, so the preference for it probably has passed down through our lineage, probably as something that we re-learn every generation. Now if I get some grandchildren, I will have to make sure that they are exposed to fish pie at an early age!

    Adrian Paterson is a lecturer in Pest-Management and Conservation at Lincoln University. He has a lot of preferences that he would like to explain!