EcoLincNZ

Month: September 2023

  • Every pyromaniacs dream… the science plant BBQ

    In recent decades, climate change has been a cause for social and environmental transformation. For example, the inclusion of words such as ‘eco-anxiety’ to the Oxford English Dictionary shows the growing apprehension we have about the future of our climate. Next time you are feeling overwhelmed as a result of the environment, you’ll have the perfect word to describe it! The reasoning behind part of this social shift is due to ecological impacts caused by events such as rising sea levels, ocean acidification and wildfire. 

    When I was growing up, we lived on the outskirts of Rangiora. I was 7 years old when I experienced uncontrolled fire for the first time; the boundary trees of a farm I could see from my bedroom window went up in flames. After a couple of hours, and a team of fire fighters, the blaze was put out. This event was minuscule compared to the damage caused by the Port Hills fire in 2017, which burnt 1,660 hectares of land, or 1,646 rugby fields, over a worryingly 66 days.

    The Sugarloaf transmission tower is threatened by multiple fires burning out-of-control in the Port Hills south of Christchurch, New Zealand (Left), Image by Ross Younger from Flicker.
    Orroral Valley Fire viewed from Tuggeranong, Australia (Right), Image by Nick D from Wikimedia Commons.

    More recently, our neighbours across the ditch experienced one of the worst fire events in history. The Australian Bushfires of 2019/20 burnt a whopping 18.626 million hectares of land; equivalent to too many rugby fields to count!

    The impacts of wildfire go beyond immediate destruction. Long term effects include challenges for biodiversity and human health. Additionally, the economic toll of wildfires can be extremely pressing. The Port Hills fire alone cost $7.9 million NZD to suppress; I would hate to think of the cost imposed by the Australian Bushfires. Throughout these events, astounding acts of courage were witnessed, whilst land, infrastructure and, regrettably, lives were lost; but could these events have been prevented or the severity of damage lessened? 

    Though recent fires in New Zealand may not be as severe as those witnessed overseas, further destructive fire events are looming. Future conditions likely to be more common in much of New Zealand are hotter temperatures, lower rainfall and windier conditions: a recipe for a fiery landscape. One of the key factors that impacts the scale and intensity of fires is vegetation and their corresponding fuel loads. For example, a plant with a low moisture content and high dead material percentage will, in theory, pose a higher risk if fire were present. However, little research in New Zealand, or worldwide, has put this to the test empirically. 

    Sarah Wyse from the University of Canterbury and her team of scientists acknowledged this knowledge gap and took it as an opportunity. “A quantitative assessment of shoot flammability for 60 tree and shrub species supports rankings based on expert opinion” was published in the Journal of Wildland Fire in 2016. The aim of this paper was to quantify the shoot-level flammability of 60 native and exotic plant species found in New Zealand and compare these results with rankings derived from previous studies. 

    Plant barbeque in action! Image by Georgina Woods

    One of the key pieces of equipment required for this study was a plant barbeque; yes you heard me right. Built out of a 44-gallon drum, the plant barbeque is every pyromaniacs dream. Rather than just burning components of a plant, this study burnt whole shoots (maximum 70 cm long) which preserved much of the plant’s structure. Each sample was left on the grill for 2 minutes to create the same environment as if an approaching wildfire. Once the sample had heated, it received direct flame from a blow torch for 10 seconds. Following this, measurements, such as ignition time, burning time and maximum temperature, were recorded. Overall, this approach creates more realistic wildfire conditions and much more ecologically significant data.

    The study found species such as gorse, manna gum and kūmarahou to be high in flammability whereas species such as whauwhaupaku, hangehange and kotukutuku were low in flammability. These findings have contributed to paving the way for the development of mitigation tools, such as green firebreaks. Green firebreaks are strips of vegetation comprised of plant species that are low in flammability. This reduces the spread of fire, making our landscapes more resilient. As well as this, they contribute to encouraging native biodiversity to flourish.  

    This is only the beginning for plant flammability, which has scope for future research. One of the co-authors of this project, Tim Curran from Lincoln University, has a goal to make this data set and future research known worldwide. Further investigation is going to continually contribute to the existing valuable pool of knowledge, tackling the challenges that continue to threaten humankind.

    As we experience the consequences of climate change, it is normal to feel that creeping sense of eco-anxiety, but this research may help you ease those nerves. Knowing more about a problem is always helpful. So, whilst Sarah, Tim and other keen researchers help expand what we know about plant flammability, I’d save your marshmallows for another day; perhaps we won’t end up as a ball of flames after all. 

    This article was prepared by Bachelor of Science (Honours) student Georgina Woods as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

    Citation: Wyse, S. V., Perry, G. L. W., O’Connell, D. M., Holland, P. S., Wright, M. J., Hosted, C. L., Whitelock, S. L., Geary, I. J., Maurin, K. J. L., & Curran, T. J. (2016). A quantitative assessment of shoot flammability for 60 tree and shrub species supports rankings based on expert opinion. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 25(4), 466–477. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF15047

  • Making a splash: Protecting the manu with Mānuka and Kānuka

    The art and joy of bombing off a bridge. Photo: Gen Toop. Dec, 2022

    “Do a manu” “Do a bomb”. On a hot summers day these are the chants that ring out across Aotearoa as packs of kids and adults line up on bridges or climb atop rocks and get ready to jump into a lake or a river. A ‘bomb’ or a ‘manu’ is a very precise manoeuvre that involves jumping from somewhere high, curling into a ball and making the biggest splash you can when you hit the water. Some would argue that a manu involves more technical aerial acrobatics than a simple bomb. Either way, the bomb or the manu is a rite of passage for many New Zealand kids.

    But increasingly this treasured national pastime is under threat. The Ministry for the Environment painted a grim picture of waterway health in its recent Our Freshwater report. Nearly half of New Zealand’s lakes are in poor or very poor health. Only two in every hundred lakes are in good or very good health. Many rivers have become so polluted that they are now unsafe for swimming at times. And it is not only humans who can no longer safely swim in some of the country’s rivers. Native freshwater fish are struggling to survive. More than three-quarters of them are threatened with extinction.

    The native freshwater birds that depend on rivers, lakes and estuaries, are also in peril. More than two thirds of them are threatened with extinction or at risk of becoming threatened. Introduced predators, like trout and stoats, are one of the main culprits behind the decline in native freshwater fish and bird populations. The degradation of freshwater habitat by pollution is another driver that is pushing these precious species closer to extinction. Cleaning up waterways is important not only for protecting the long-held tradition of doing a ‘manu’, it’s also critical to the protection ngā manu (the birds) of Aotearoa.

    Algal Bloom in the Waikirikiri, Selwyn River. Photo Credit: Gen Toop. Jan 2021

    Nitrogen pollution is one of the leading causes of the degradation of New Zealand’s freshwater ecosystems. When excess nitrogen on the land seeps down through the soil past the rootzone of plants it can get into the groundwater. From there it can move into the aquifers that many communities and cities get their drinking water from, or it can re-emerge in springs and get into lakes and rivers. Once in those lakes and rivers nitrogen can cause algal blooms, which can suck oxygen out of the water making it difficult for freshwater fish to survive. These algal blooms also make rivers a lot less appealing for jumping into on a hot summers day. Some algae are even toxic and can cause human health issues as well as kill sensitive animals like dogs.

    There are lots of different forms of nitrogen, but one of the main forms that leaches in this way is nitrate. The vast bulk of nitrate pollution getting into New Zealand’s freshwater comes from agriculture. That’s mainly because New Zealand’s pastures are loaded up with synthetic nitrogen fertiliser and the urine of the livestock feeding on these pastures has huge amounts of nitrogen in it. When livestock, particularly dairy cows, urinate the plants can’t always use all the nitrogen for their growth and so the excess nitrate can leach into waterways.

    Mānuka (Leptospernum scoparium) flowers. Photo Credit: Vil Sandi, Flickr, licensed under CC-BY-ND 2.0

    A promising new solution to this nitrate leaching problem has been explored by researchers from Lincoln University, Canterbury University and Plant and Food Research. In 2017, the scientists simulated a dairy cow urinating (not something many of us do in our day jobs) and compared the nitrate leaching rates under three tree species that could be planted into dairy pastures; radiata pine (an exotic species), mānuka (native) and kānuka (native). They found that mānuka and kānuka leached far lower amounts of nitrogen (2 kg/ha) than pine (53 kg/ha).

    Speaking about the project Dr Juergen Esperschuetz, the lead researcher from Lincoln university said, “These results show mānuka and kānuka could be even more effective at protecting water systems than anyone expected.”

    Intentionally planting trees into pasture where animals continue to graze is a farming system called silvopasture. Silvo is derived from the latin word for forest and pasture, well we all know what that is. Silvopasture is not just about shelterbelts, windbreaks, and riparian buffers, systems which relegate trees to the margins of a farm. Instead, silvopasture systems often plant trees into the paddock itself. It has been said that silvopasture, and other agroforestry systems like it, represent a shift away from monocultural production and towards an agricultural system that more closely mimics natural forest ecosystems. Mānuka and kānuka are native trees to Aotearoa so incorporating them into dairy pastures also provides a way to bring more native biodiversity back into farming landscapes.

    The researchers also found that soils under the mānuka and kānuka emit far less nitrous oxide, with the mānuka soils emitting the least of the three. Nitrous oxide is an extremely potent greenhouse gas, it is long lived and in Aotearoa, the vast bulk of nitrous oxide emissions come from livestock farming. So planting mānuka and kānuka into dairy pastures could also help in the fight against climate change. On top of that, both trees produce high-value products in the form of oils and honey and that could be used to supplement farm income.

    Cows grazing in a silvopasture. Photo Credit: Gayle Weaver,pixabay.com, licensed under CCO

    Since the publication of this study, other researchers have gone on to use parts of its methodology and draw on its findings in their research. In the Wairarapa, a study done in the field found much lower nitrate levels under manuka than under pasture, corroborating the findings from this glasshouse study done by Dr Esperchuetz and his team. In Spain, researchers also drew on the study when they investigated nitrate leaching risk under walnut silvopasture.

    This study has added to the toolkit of options available to help reduce the environmental impact of pastoral farming in Aotearoa. Incorporating mānuka and kānuka trees into pastures will not only bring biodiversity into farming landscapes. Thanks to this research, we now know it will likely help clean up our lakes and rivers too, protecting both ngā manu and the manu now and into the future.

    This article was prepared by Master of Science postgraduate student Genevieve Toop as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

    You can read the full article here: Esperschuetz, J., Balaine, N., Clough, T., Bulman, S., Dickinson, N. M., Horswell, J., & Robinson, B. H. (2017). The potential of L. scoparium, K. robusta and P. radiata to mitigate N-losses in silvopastural systems. Environmental pollution, 225, 12-19.

  • A giant pest problem: elephants in the backyard

    New Zealand has a huge agricultural industry. It also has a pest problem. I myself have been out to a friends’ farm and was told to “squash a mouse if you see one”! Which I think we can all empathise with to an extent. When the little b*stards are eating your food, they might as well be infesting your wallet.

    Image CC-BY-SA Diego Delso on Wikimedia Commons: Elephants and humans live in close contact in Africa

    Now, think about scaling that up a couple of levels. You no longer have nuisance, albeit damaging, mice scurrying around your farm shed. Instead you have elephants, in herds of 11+, munching through entire fields and even ripping doors off your grain sheds. Stomping won’t quite suffice here (and may go the other way).

    This is an issue that Abel Mamboleo and his PhD supervisors, Chile Doscher and Adrian Paterson, at Lincoln University investigated in their JOJ wildlife and Biology paper in 2020. Instead of the standard numbers, quantities and figures you may expect in a science paper, here they take a slightly alternative approach to the topic. What do people think is happening in their backyards? After all, fear and perceptions are powerful things.

    To start with a bit of context – who are we talking about when referring to people? This study interacted with people in the region of Bunda, a very densely populated region in Tanzania. Much of its land is a part of the idyllic Serengeti ecosystem, and boasts an internationally renowned tourism hotspot.

    Bunda location within Tanzania – right next to the Serengeti: Image CC-BY-SA Macabe 5387 on Wikimedia commons

    These people rely heavily on farming. In fact, 80% of annual income in Bunda comes from this industry. You can imagine how devastating it is to have these creatures, as amazing and majestic as elephants may be, decimate their fields of crops.

    Elephants eating crops is not a new story. In fact, there are even somewhat humorous accounts of elephants eating rotten fruit in orchards and getting themselves rather drunk in the process. Thieving behaviour may even be tolerated – these giants are big money for tourism. However, in this particular context, such interactions are becoming more and more problematic. In this area, as the human population grows, human-elephant interactions also increase.

    Mamboleo went to this area to ask local people their thoughts about these interactions. Using interviews and questionnaires in local languages to ensure clear messages, they found that 88% of those asked thought these human-elephant interactions were on the increase. Furthermore, 79% of respondents reported these events were most common on farms.

    This in and of itself is not necessarily an issue. Local people had described the elephants as generally ‘docile’ and can even be safely approached to within 50 m. In the past, farmers have sometimes been able to simply scare elephants away themselves using traditional techniques, such as patrolling and fencing. Elephant ‘friendliness’ has even been suggested in other parts of Africa, with some suggesting elephants are going as far as to domesticate themselves. However, now, elephants are beginning to ignore these scaring techniques, some becoming bolder and potentially more dangerous.

    How is this affecting people?

    You can begin to see how conflicts between elephants and humans are likely to grow, with 32% of people thinking that elephants will react to seeing a person by killing them, and guarding crops being a main way for these people to protect their livelihoods. And for another large minority, 42% of those asked, they experienced elephants simply continuing to eat their crops in the presence of humans. Evidently, these people don’t have effective tools to deter elephants and protect their farms.

    Extreme measures: what to do next?

    We can see how people would be having a hard time with their elephant neighbours here. But what about the elephants?

    Elephants are protected in Tanzania. The people of Bunda know this. However, desperate times sometimes call for desperate measures. Therefore, occasionally, when an elephant is raiding crops, people may turn to lethal measures. Whilst few people who were interviewed list this as a response to seeing elephants raiding crops, Mamboleo raises the valid point that this number could be higher. Local people know that there could be consequences of authorities finding that illegal elephant kills had taken place in the Bunda region.

    Elephants & mice – really that different? Image by GlobalP from iStock

    This may seem like a drastic response. However, killing pests such as rats, rabbits and mice that eat crops in NZ doesn’t seem so drastic, does it? Of course, this is a very different situation – elephants are native to this area, and are endangered and protected. But this comparison does make you realise that wanting to kill the problem can be a fairly universal response.

    Mamboleo notes that cheap responses can be turned to in the absence of timely support from conservation authorities…so what can be done about that?

    Well, there are some cool things being done across Africa to help with these conflicts. For example, do you know that elephants are scared of bees? Who’d have thought. Some projects actually exist to build bee hives around fences to keep elephants away, and this seems to work pretty well. It also turns out that elephants don’t like spicy food – so chilli can be used in a similar way.

    Image by Kengee8 on Wikimedia Commons: Example of elephant-bee fence

    More ideas, such as this would, be very useful to help in these situations. Answering questions such as when are elephants most likely to visit the farms may also be helpful for targeted responses, Mamboleo says.

    Knowing how people feel, how they’re responding to the situation, and what they need to do to help them resolve the situation for the best outcomes for people and wildlife is a great first step here. That’s the valuable context needed to now take the next steps and make solutions that will work. Especially when we can’t just stomp on the problem!

    This article was prepared by Master of International Nature Conservation student Sally Sinclair as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

  • Kea pine for a new home?

    Kea, our smart alpine parrots, are sometimes a little too clever for their own good. They are a species struggling to maintain large and healthy populations. Part of their problem is that they are very curious and seem to be fascinated by what humans do, and more importantly, often live in human-influenced habitat. This is not such a good trait when it leads them to interact with hazards like lead or toxins, nor is it useful if they find human ‘junk’ food.

    This curiosity is also not helpful when we want to study kea. Many of the approaches that work with other bird species just fail for kea. Instead of going about their business they come and see what you are doing, and that’s not great for understanding key aspects of their life histories.

    Spot the kea at the top of the tree! Image by Adrian Paterson.

    I has some first-hand experience with researching kea about twenty five years ago, when I was a newly minted Lincoln University lecturer. I was helping Kerry-Jayne Wilson to supervise a masters student, Mark Jarratt. Mark was interested in how much lead, and other nasty waste, the kea were finding in the local Arthur’s Pass area, and consuming, in their habitat. For example, lead was present in paints, shotgun pellets and rubbish in the tips and kea were often observed eating it.

    Mark had to catch kea to take blood samples to check for lead contamination. Catching kea can be fairly challenging. They are not easily fooled and they can learn by observing others. Adding to the difficulty was that we had to keep the birds in captivity for an hour or so as part of the procedure. And this was a problem.

    We initially used a cage. We would capture a kea, put it in a holding cage, and then go and try and capture the next one. However, each kea would often figure out how to escape the cage. We would return to find a cage open and our patient free (and not likely to be so easily caught again). So then we took the cage with a kea into a small hut nearby, thinking that if the bird got out of the cage then they would at least be in the hut. Unfortunately, some of the kea managed to figure out how to open the windows in the hut. Moral: don’t work with animals smarter than you are!

    So, when PhD student Jodanne Aitken came to James Ross and me and wanted to do a project on kea, I was a little hesitant. However, Jodanne is nothing if not persistent, passionate and persuasive, and a project on kea was begun.

    Early morning in the plantation. The native forest in the distance was often commuted to and from by kea. Image by Adrian Paterson.

    Jodanne was interested in how kea move about and utilise the landscape. Much of her PhD work is in the Southern Alps around Arthur’s Pass, where she is using transmitters to figure out just how mobile kea can be. Is that kea you see gnawing your car wiper blades from the local valley or could it be from several mountain ranges away? More on that in future EcoLincNZ articles!

    Jodanne’s initial work was in looking at how kea might be using plantations of introduced pine and Douglas fir in the Nelson region. Forestry has become a dominant part of many regional landscapes, often hilly and where native forests once grew (and kea once flew). This is especially the case in the Nelson region. The question that Jodanne wanted to answer was whether these forestry plantations, typically monocultures with a lot of human activity, provide a net gain or loss for kea.

    Jodanne filming kea foraging behaviour. Image by Adrian Paterson.

    Are plantations the equivalent of barren wastes for kea, where there is little food and high densities of mammalian predators (not to mention hazards that humans introduce into an area)? Alternatively, do plantations offer new food resources and places to roost and nest? Of course there could be a range of outcomes from positive to negative.

    Jodanne was able to work in forestry blocks run by Nelson Forestry Limited. Local workers were key to providing Jodanne with almost real-time information on kea presence within blocks that were being actively harvested. One advantage of working in plantations were the forestry roads that gave rapid, if a little hair-raising, access to most of these areas.

    Jodanne was able to capture three kea and mount GPS trackers in fancy backpacks to collect movement data. She also observed kea during the morning and late afternoon-early evening periods for several months, mostly to record their feeding. Jodanne used direct and video observations to observe their foraging. Kea poo was also collected when available to get some physical information about diet.

    The kea with transmitters spread their time between the plantation areas and neighbouring native forest. The majority of time was spent in the pines where they foraged, roosted and nested. Kea were observed eating pine seed, as well as tissue stripped off newly harvested Douglas fir logs. The faecal samples, well the bits that could be identified, contained lots of invertebrates.

    Kea have discovered that they can strip the bark of newly harvested logs, scrape off the cambion tissue, chew this and get something nice out of it. (Maybe a bit like eating sweets?) This may be one of the attractions of being in plantations. Image by Adrian Paterson.

    In short, as summarised in a NZ Journal of Zoology paper, kea seemed to be using the pine plantations in similar ways to more natural areas. Good news! However, one of three kea that carried a GPS recorder was killed by a cat. So, there may be some significant risks for kea spending a lot of their time in these areas. ‘Swings and roundabouts’ as they say.

    Despite this being a relatively small scale study, it does indicate that we could learn a lot more about kea in these highly modified landscapes. Jodanne has taken this training and shifted her sights to a much larger scale project on kea movement in the Southern Alps and southern Westland.

    Kea are one of the smartest bird species on the planet but they still need our help to let them survive the arrival of the smartest mammal species and the changes that we have made. Understanding this clever species is fundamental to helping them. This tricky challenge has been accepted by Jodanne and her research colleagues.

    Article by Adrian Paterson, an Associate Professor in the Department of Pest-management and Conservation at Lincoln University.

  • The superpowers of NZ moss: Dry shrubland and its moss ground cover

    I love moss.

    I have always loved mosses. They are so cute!

    Moss is green, all kinds of green, every nuance.

    Some of them are leafy, some of them flat, and some look like cushions.

    They make the forest floor look like a fairyland.

    Moss between bricks in front of Ivy Hall, Lincoln University. (Image from Eva Saison)
    Moss surrounded by render, Lincoln University. (Image from Eva Saison)
    Moss growing on Ivy Hall facade, Lincoln University. (Image from Eva Saison)

    Even better than simply being aesthetically pleasing, mosses have superpowers.

    Like Spider-Man, they stick to vertical flat surfaces, decorating walls with adorable green spots. Moss also has another power. I remember walking through the dunes in my hometown of Calais (France), the sound of waves in the background. Suddenly, between the European beachgrass (Ammophilia arenaria) that keeps the sand and dunes in place, I spot a brown patch of dead moss. Dead? Not really. With just a few drops of water on it, the moss revives in a few seconds, turning the brownish-dead area into a bright green patch of life. Just amazing. Tiny dune zombies are coming back to life through water.

    Moss shows off its Spider-man skills on Ivy Hall, Lincoln University. (Image from Eva Saison)
    Dead looking (but not dead at all) moss on a tree. (Image from Eva Saison)

    Consequently, moss brings joy to people, or at least to me. However, what role is moss playing in nature?

    The study conducted by Rebecca Dollery, Mike Bowie, and Nicholas Dickinson in 2022 helps to answer this question. They were particularly focused on the importance of moss ground cover in a dry shrubland area of New Zealand. They found that moss could be represented as a collector that loves to hoard various things.

    First into the hoard is water. Moss absorbs rainwater or humidity from the air. Moss is almost always wet when touched. The water is then used by the moss. The soil benefits from the waterlogged moss cover: in summer, soil is wetter under the moss carpet. The moss acts as a protective layer for the soil against the summer heat, allowing retention of water in the soil. The water is later used by the surrounding plants. In a dry shrubland environment, moss can have a positive effect on other native plants populating the area.

    Second into the hoard are soil nutrients. All plants need them to grow. One of the most important nutrients is nitrogen (N). It can be found in soil and absorbed by the plants in two forms: nitrate (NO3–) and ammonium (NH4+) molecules. With the ground covered by a moss carpet, the quantity of nitrate and ammonium in the soil decreased, up to 75% for the latter. In addition, the thicker the moss, the lower the amount of nitrate. Therefore, moss not only absorbs water but also sequesters essential nutrients. The nitrogen is trapped within the moss.

    This sounds alarming: moss is taking away the necessary food source of all other plants. However, this is not a tragedy for the dry shrubland environment. Indeed, their soil is low in nutrients under normal circumstances. Consequently, the plants growing there are adapted to these conditions. On the contrary and surprisingly, they might even suffer from a large increase in soil nutrients. The moss carpet thus preserves the original composition of the soil, which is also the optimum growing condition for plants native to dry shrublands.

    Third into the hoard are the seeds that fall and are stored within the moss layer. The researchers tested the impact of moss ground cover on the ability of some native species to germinate. Generally, moss cover prevents germination: fewer seeds germinate than on bare ground. The scientists supposed that the seeds did not germinate because they were in the dark, after falling into the depth of the moss layer. This was mostly observed with tauhinu (Pomaderris amoena) and kānuka (Kunzea serotina) (the species name was revised back to Kunzea ericoides in 2023). Both suffered a 60% reduction of their germination capacity.

    The seeds of the common broom (Carmichaelia australis) can germinate in the dark. For this species, the high humidity within the moss could be the reason why seeds germinated up to 88% less often with moss ground cover. Nevertheless, some seeds germinated and became seedlings. Their next step was to have their roots access the soil to absorb nutrients. The scientists observed that more common broom seedlings survived on the bare ground than with ground moss cover. The moss layer probably acted as a barrier between the roots and the soil. Despite that, the seedlings of common broom and tauhinu that germinated with moss were up to 3 times heavier than the ones from bare soil. This indicates that the conditions provided by the moss cover have had a positive impact on their growth.

    Rebecca and the team identified the moss as a plant that loves to stockpile things: first water, then nitrogen, and finally seeds. The various impacts of the collecting moss were in some ways beneficial for the native plants of the dry shrubland ecosystem. They were, however, detrimental towards exotic and invasive weeds. These invasive species suffer from the low nutrients in the soil and the difficulties of germinating within the moss layer. Moss, therefore, participates in the conservation of native plants in the dry shrubland ecosystem.

    A very interesting name can be added to the “things collected by moss” list: carbon (C). Sphagnum moss are one of the main components of peatlands. In these ecosystems more vegetation is growing than is decomposing, thus vegetation, including moss, is gradually accumulated as layers of peat. Furthermore, when plants are growing, they absorb CO2 from the atmosphere, they keep the carbon to form sugar and release oxygen (O2). Therefore, peatlands are trapping carbon in their vegetation, in their moss. Larmola and colleagues (2014) calculated that one-third of the total amount of carbon stocked on land is trapped in peatlands!

    Zoom in on Sphagnum moss. (Kirill Ignatyev, CC BY-NC 2.0, Flickr)

    After all those discoveries, I continue to love and admire moss. I will carry on watching the moss turn green again in the dunes and taking naps on forest moss. Those tiny superheroes decorate my city pavement and walls, promote native plant species in New Zealand’s dry shrublands and trap carbon from the atmosphere, as little fighters against global warming.

    This article was prepared by Master of International Nature Conservation student Eva Saison as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

    Dollery, R., Bowie, M. H., & Dickinson, N. M. (2022). The ecological importance of moss ground cover in dry shrubland restoration within an irrigated agricultural landscape matrix. Ecology and Evolution, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8843

    Heenan, P. B., McGlone, M. S., Mitchell, C. M., McCarthy, J. K., & Houliston, G. J. (2023). Genotypic variation, phylogeography, unified species concept, and the ‘grey zone’ of taxonomic uncertainty in kānuka: Recognition of Kunzea ericoides (A.Rich.) Joy Thomps. sens. lat. (Myrtaceae). New Zealand Journal of Botany, 0(0), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.2022.2162427

    Larmola, T., Leppänen, S. M., Tuittila, E.-S., Aarva, M., Merilä, P., Fritze, H., & Tiirola, M. (2014). Methanotrophy induces nitrogen fixation during peatland development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(2), 734–739. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314284111

  • Kiwi calling: when listening is not enough

    I don’t know about your’s, but my mum gets worried when I don’t respond to her phone calls for a few hours. Once, I can’t remember what I was doing, but I didn’t hear the phone ringing. When I finally checked my phone I saw about 17483 missed calls, oops. I can only wonder what went through her mind when I wasn’t responding: she was probably picturing me skydiving, in an ambulance, or lost in the woods during a hike.

    But what if she’d had a more statistical mindset and thought about why I hadn’t responded? Or even better: what if she’d thought about reasons why she could not detect me?

    Ecologists and conservationists consider something similar when analysing data obtained from searching an area for a certain animal species. An animal could be present at a certain site, but still go undetected. First, they have to consider what ecological reasons might have determined where the species was present or absent (for instance, where is there suitable habitat within the considered area). Second, they have to take into account what factors might have influenced the likelihood of actually observing the species (such as the distance from the observer, or the fact that the surveyor may not be skilled enough to recognise the species). These are defined, respectively, as occupancy (which is the same as saying “presence”) and detection probabilities, and can be estimated by using statistical models.

    Occupancy probability and detection probability are described by two different models and both of them will influence what will be observed during a survey. Taking into account that not all the animals will be observed is very important when attempting to accurately assess a species’ presence, which could otherwise be underestimated.

    A young roroa being released as part of the Operation Nest Egg programme. Image by Jon Sullivan on Flickr.

    Peter Jahn, James Ross, Darryl MacKenzie and Laura Molles, in a study published in 2022, wanted to know how accurate acoustic surveys of roroa-great spotted kiwi (Apteryx maxima) were between 2011-2015. During this time, 18 birds were translocated from the Hawdon Valley, in Arthur’s Pass National Park, to the Nina Valley, in Lake Sumner Forest Park, representing one of the initial efforts of the Operation Nest Egg programme. The researchers also wanted to compare kiwi presence before and after 2015, and between the two areas.

    They gathered data from a survey conducted in 2012-2013 by DOC in both the valleys and then repeated the methodology in 2017-2018. The technique they used was passive acoustic monitoring (PAM). PAM is effective when studying elusive species such as kiwi. Automatic recorders were deployed in the two study areas and left there for up to three weeks, activating just before sunset and switching off shortly after sunrise.

    The team analysed the kiwi calls recorded in each of the valleys. The goal was to find a model that would best describe the obtained data, and use it as a base to estimate occupancy and detection probability. Peter Jahn and colleagues wanted to know which factors were important in detecting the kiwi and looked at the study area (Nina and Hawdon Valleys), year, length of the survey night, breeding/non-breeding season, precipitation, wind speed, night length, varying recorder battery capacity.

    Similarly, my mum could have considered the fact that my phone may have been in silent mode, or had no service, or estimated the actual likelihood of me being in an ambulance. All of these factors could have influenced her imperfect detection of me.

    In both the study areas, the detection probability was found to be higher during the breeding season, to increase with longer survey nights and to be influenced by wind speed, rain accumulation and recorder sensitivity. Also, as expected, kiwi presence in the Nina Valley increased after the translocation, as it did in the Hawdon Valley. Moreover, it was found that the number of sites where kiwi calls were recorded increased in 2017-2018 in both the areas and that, in total, many more calls were detected in the Hawdon Valley than in the Nina Valley.

    The Hawdon Valley in Arthur’s Pass National Park. Image CC-BY-NC by Jon Sullivan on Flickr.

    Wait, the number of sites where calls were recorded and the presence of kiwi increased in the Hawdon Valley after kiwi were removed from there? How is that possible? Yeah, that was one surprising finding of the study. In fact, the researchers were expecting that occupancy would decrease after the birds’ removal, but what they found actually suggests that new pairs re-occupied the territories left inhabited by the translocated individuals.

    This is a promising result, because it means that such conservation strategy doesn’t necessarily negatively influence the population from which the individuals are taken. Also, the ongoing pest mammal control in the Hawdon Valley could have balanced the negative effect of the translocation. I guess the only thing left to do now is find out what makes kiwi desire those territories so much that they can’t stay away: maybe they have the most delicious earthworms of New Zealand?

    To conclude, these findings demonstrate that the species is reacting well to this reintroduction programme, considered that kiwi presence increased in the Nina Valley too. Furthermore, this study showed that combining occupancy estimates through statistical models with acoustic monitoring is very useful when studying the outcomes of kiwi’s translocations. However, if you, reader, can’t wait to know more about what happens to our dear kiwi when we move them around, sit back and read Peter Jahn’s PhD thesis: never stop learning.

    Finally, going back to my mum trying to “detect” me: I suggest the probability would increase a lot if she learned to call outside of my usual napping times!

    This article was prepared by Master of International Nature Conservation student Francisco Bini as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

    Jahn, P., Ross, J. G., MacKenzie, D. I., & Molles, L. E. (2022). Acoustic monitoring and occupancy analysis: Cost-effective tools in reintroduction programmes for roroa-great spotted kiwi. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 46(1), 3466.