EcoLincNZ

Category: agroecology

  • Fire-resisting superpowers in plants

    I don’t know what you like to eat at barbecues, but I like some nice roasted veggies! What I don’t fancy are burned broccoli or charred cauliflower. Who would want to eat that, right? Do you have an idea what causes huge amounts of burnt veggies each year? It’s wildfires!

    Seasoned vegetables,
    by polaristest (Flickr)

    With 8-11% of wildfires globally occurring on agricultural land you can imagine that these cause a lot of unenjoyable vegetables. Agricultural wildfires mostly derive from accidental ignition from machinery use or through the escape of fires initially deliberately lit for management purposes. Because 38% of land worldwide is used for grazing and cropping, there is a lot of potential for fire, which highlights the importance of reducing the fire risk to secure our major food sources.

    We don’t have to go far to realise the significance of this topic, as Canterbury accounts for around 20% of New Zealand’s total farmland, roughly 2,600,000 hectares of land. That is about the size of 3,700,000 rugby fields! Canterbury has a climate characterised by low precipitation and dry winds, good ingredients for an easily flammable outdoor barbecue.

    Local wildfires take away many people’s chance to roast their veggies themselves as well as causing a huge amount of economic and ecological loss. But what if we could use farmland for fire prevention? What if some crops actually had the superpower to fight against wildfires, or at least survive them?

    Canterbury NZ, by Simon (Flickr)

    There is a lot of information on how to plant mindfully, using low-flammability plants to create buffer zones that allow us to keep wildfires under control and stop them from spreading. Those ‘green fire breaks’ were tactically planted after the Port Hill fires in 2017 to prevent history from repeating itself. As green fire breaks can only help reduce the impact of wildfires to some extent, planting smart on farmland might add to the best practice, especially in fire-prone areas like Canterbury.

    That is exactly what was tested in a study by Lincoln University in 2023. Masters student Tanmayi Pagadala, with colleagues Azhar Alam, Tom Maxwell, and Tim Curran, tested 47 different agricultural plants for their flammability superpowers, following a simple recipe.

    Ingredients:
    – 47 different shoots and plants of the following groups: cereal crops, forage crops, fruit trees, grazing forbs, pasture grasses, weeds, pasture legumes, vegetables, and wine grapes.

    Utensils:
    – Infrared laser thermometer
    – Lighter
    – Plant barbecue (“a 44 gallon drum cut in half with a grill on top”) 

    Plant barbecue
    (Image by Hanna Hoeffner)

    Instructions:
    – Heat the grill by turning on the burner (125-199 °C)
    – Place your sample on the grill in a horizontal position and leave for 2 minutes
    – Turn on the blowtorch for 10 seconds to ignite the sample
    – Wait until the plant stops burning

    Following this recipe, one can evaluate the ignition time, the maximum temperature reached, the burning time, and how much of the sample was burned.

    After many days of barbecues, Tanmayi’s team was able to tell which plants have the superpower to resist fires better than others. Fruits and cereal crops had significantly higher flammability compared to vegetables, weeds, winegrapes, forage crops, grazing herbs, pasture grasses and legumes. Or, to make it more understandable, easily flammable crops dry faster, are generally dryer, and retain more dead material. Veggie superheroes were bell peppers, spring onions, and potatoes.

    Tanmayi’s team created “A fire-wise mixed cropping farm system” as a guideline for purposeful planting on farmland. The idea of fire-wise cropping is similar to green fire breaks. Using low-flammability native tree, grass and legume species as boundaries around higher flammable crops. 

    Broccoloid, by CaptainEdawardTeague (deviantart)

    Higher flammability species are then protected from wildfires that start outside of the farmland and also prevent fires started on the farm from spreading to neighbouring properties. While you must consider other factors, like local environmental conditions, economics, and goals like enhancing biodiversity, this approach can add to existing green fire breaks. By redesigning farms, we can utilise the fire-resistant superpowers of some species to safely plant non-super-powered plants and minimise increasing the wildfire risk.

    Even though this research was conducted in New Zealand, many of the species tested are common crops worldwide. Therefore, their superpowers could come in handy in many places with continuously increasing fire risks, putting veggies at the forefront of the fight against wildfires!

    This article was prepared by Master of International Nature Conservation student Hanna Hoeffner as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

    Pagadala, T., Alam, M. A., Maxwell, T. M., & Curran, T. J. (2024). Measuring flammability of crops, pastures, fruit trees, and weeds: A novel tool to fight wildfires in agricultural landscapes. Science of the Total Environment, 906, 167489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167489

  • Fighting fire with farming: flammability of pastures and crops

    The Port Hills are a highly valued geographical feature of Chirstchurch. Located southeast of the city, they are home to a wide range of activities, including rock climbing and mountain biking, as well as being popular among walkers and joggers. Vegetation throughout the Port Hills is varied, containing a range of tussockland, pine forestry blocks, native scrub, farmed grassland, gorse and broom scrub and small pockets of remnant forest.

    On the 14th of February 2024, over 700 hectares of land was ravaged by wildfire in the Port Hills of Christchurch, New Zealand. Over 80 residents were evacuated, and around 130 firefighters with 12 helicopters were involved. Drought conditions and vegetation structure contributed to this event, but could the damage caused by the blaze have been reduced? Could grazing these hills with livestock have reduced the amount of tall dry grass present which fuelled the fire, or could different pasture or shrub species have helped to reduce the flammability of the Port Hills.

    A recent paper from Lincoln University’s own Tanmayi Pagadala, Azharul Alam, Tim Curran and Tom Maxwell has highlighted the differences in flammability between different pasture, crop, weed and shrub species found commonly on farms throughout Canterbury.

    Marley’s Hill on fire. February 15 2024. (Image CC BY-NC by Jon Sullivan)

    A good range of scientific work is available which has investigated the flammability of various plant species in New Zealand, but this has been mainly focused on species in natural areas (both native and exotic), rather than in agricultural environments. Gorse, eucalypts, pines and long grass are well known to be extremely flammable, so why is it that certain areas of the port hills were allowed to return to their same fuel rich state following the 2017 blaze which destroyed over 1600 hectares? It must be acknowledged that efforts were made to replant some of the previously burnt areas in green firebreaks and others in less flammable native species, which were shown to survive the previous blaze in well-established areas.

    Species that regrow following a fire are often also very flammable (eg. gorse and pine). Unfortunately, a significant proportion of the burned land was in pines for forestry, which has since been replanted and will likely create another significant fire risk for the foreseeable future. Continuing the efforts of plant firebreaks of less flammable tree species throughout the Port Hills, as well as within pine forestry blocks, should not be underestimated.

    Individually these breaks may not appear significant, but a thorough network of them throughout the Port Hills could be exactly what is needed to slow the spread of the next blaze and allow firefighters to gain control sooner. Minimising the presence of long, rank grass could also help to slow the spread of the burn.

    Could additional efforts be made in to reducing the presence of long rank grass through the addition of cattle to grazed areas which would trample and eat this dry plant material? Or perhaps planting more drought tolerant, water-efficient forages which can be grazed down during dry periods to minimise the fuel loading of grasslands could be beneficial.

    Dry, rank grass fuelling the blaze on Christchurch’s Port Hills. (Image CC BY Francis Vallance)

    There is a huge range of flammability in different crop and pasture species common to Canterbury farming systems. Assessments carried out on Lincoln University’s trusty ‘plant BBQ’ tested 47 different plant species and varieties common throughout Canterbury farms (see table below), including cereals, forage crops, fruit crops, forage herbs, forage grasses, forage legumes, vegetable crops, weeds and a range of wine grape varieties.

    Unsurprisingly, the majority of forage and pasture species showed very low flammability, as did some vegetable crops and wine grapes. Cereal crops behaved as expected, showing high flammability as they matured and dried off. Surprisingly, apple trees, pears and raspberries showed a high degree of flammability.

    Table of plant species and their relative flammability assessed by Pagadala and colleagues

    The slope of the Port Hills, and an average annual rainfall of 700 mm, means that using low flammability crops like potatoes or peas is not practical. There are, however, a range of pastoral species that show the potential to be beneficial in reducing the flammability of farmland. Forage crops, herbs, legumes and grasses all showed very low flammability scores, which is due to their high moisture content and quality traits meaning they carry very little dead material (the ideal fuel for fires).

    Knowing these flammability scores in addition to the the drought tolerant traits of species, such as lucerne, cocksfoot, red clover, plantain and chicory, raises the question: why are these species currently not implemented throughout the fire prone Port Hills as a method of reducing fire risk? Yes, these forages will become flammable if they are allowed to turn to a reproductive state. However, their drought tolerance and palatability will allow them to be well grazed during dry periods and not contribute to the fuel loading of hills anywhere near the amount that browntop and other native grasses will.

    Chicory next to native pasture in Taranaki. (© Blake Gunn – used with permission)

    The photos above paint a picture of a potential solution to the Port Hills fire woes. At the very least, an effort should be made to ensure that flammable biomass throughout the Port Hills is minimal. Minimising the presence of flammable species, such as gorse and pines, through manual removal or switching to planting less-flammable alternatives, such as native shrubs, are some potential solutions.

    Preventing the planting of pine plantations near the city and other populated areas seems like another fairly logical solution to reducing the fire risk in populated areas, as does surrounding these potential high-risk areas with low flammability and native shrub species. Another area of focus could be to focus more on the management of cattle and/or sheep to intensively graze the hillsides and ensure that a bank of highly flammable fuel does not build up over time. Intensive grazing will not only prevent grass banks from building up, but the ‘hoof and tooth’ activity from grazing may also prevent other flammable species, such as gorse and broom, from re-establishing.

    Lucerne transforming a Central Otago farm system (© Allister Moorhead – used with permission)

    Functional firebreaks could also be of huge benefit to these hillsides. In areas where tractor access is possible, consideration should be given to the establishment of drought-tolerant, low-flammability species, such as red clover, chicory, or lucerne. These will create ‘green zones’ throughout the hillsides that could slow the spread of the next inevitable fire, especially compared to the current vegetation which is prone to turning to a dry, reproductive state over summer.

    To wrap up, logic suggests that previous fires in 2017 and 2024 on the Port Hills, in combination with the presence of flammable vegetation, make another blaze in the future almost inevitable. The findings from recent research on the flammability of pasture and crop species commonly found on Canterbury farms, combined with modern grazing regimes present a real opportunity to significantly reduce the fire risk on the Port Hills. The use of firebreaks planted with native, low flammability species around high risk areas such as pine forestry blocks, along with the protection of existing pockets of native scrub/forest should also help to reduce the fire risk on the Port Hills.

    This article was prepared by Master of Science postgraduate student Kaylee Spain as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

    Reference article:
    Pagadala, T., Alam, M. A., Maxwell, T., & Curran, T. (2023). Measuring flammability of crops, pastures, fruit trees, and weeds: A novel tool to fight wildfires in agricultural landscapes. Science of the total environment, 906(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167489

  • Induced resistance, Sting, and the blades of Westernesse

    It’s a big, bad world out there and it is nice to find something that adds to our protection.This can range from vaccines against viruses, to seatbelts in cars, to laws against causing physical harm. As a naked ape we are not especially intimidating on our own and we often seek out tools to make us safer.

    “With both hands he held the elven-blade point upwards …; and so Shelob, with the driving force of her own cruel will, with strength greater than any warrior’s hand, thrust herself upon a bitter spike. Deep, deep it pricked, as Sam was crushed slowly to the ground.
    No such anguish had Shelob ever known, or dreamed of knowing, in all her long world of wickedness. Not the doughtiest soldier of old Gondor, nor the most savage Orc entrapped, had ever thus endured her, or set blade to her beloved flesh.” Lord of the Rings, JRR Tolkien (Image by Tony Galuidi; main image by Alan Lee)

    One of the key points of “The Lord of the Rings” (and all of Tolkien’s writing) is that small, seemingly ineffectual, individuals can make a real difference in the world. It’s not by chance that hobbits are smaller than humans, weaker than dwarves, less knowledgeable than elves. Tolkien emphasised their ‘normality’.

    Hobbits do have their strengths though, especially in resilience. They are able to withstand the corruption of the ring far longer than other races. Boromir, a doughty man, only has to see the ring once before plotting to ‘borrow it’ for helping with his people. Both Bilbo and Sam, ordinary hobbits, are both able to wear the ring and give it up freely, which no others have done.

    Still, even Tolkien realised that the hobbits needed a little bit of an assist, something that would help to bring out their resilient traits. Tolkien chose to give each hobbit a long dagger with an ancient pedigree. Sting was found by Bilbo. It was a blade that shone with a faint light when evil was near. Sting was made long ago in the first age by elves of Gondolin. Tom Bombadil rescues the hobbits from a barrow wight and gives them each a dagger of Westernesse. These were made a couple of thousand years before in the early Third Age by men of the Dunedain Northern kingdom.

    Each of these blades become crucial to the hobbits achieving beyond their expectations. Pippin stabs a troll chief, who are largely immune to most weapons, and makes a difference at the Battle of the Moranon. Merry cuts the Witch King’s sinews allowing Eowyn to destroy the head Nazgûl in the Battle of the Pelennor Fields, when no one else can touch him. Sam uses Sting to wound Shelob and scare her off, when nothing else would work.

    Importantly, the blades were built with different foes in mind. The blades of Westernesse were built to fight the Witch King and his minions but are useless against giant spiders. Sting was built at a time when Ungoliant’s spider brood were numerous and roaming the world, and so it is effective against Shelob and her webs.

    Merry stabs the Witch King and breaks the spell allowing Eowyn to destroy him.
    “No other blade, not though mightier hands had wielded it, would have dealt that foe a wound so bitter, cleaving the undead flesh, breaking the spell that knit his unseen sinews to his will.” – Lord of the Rings, JRR Tolkien

    So, the hobbits left the Shire with their natural hardiness and common sense, but were primed with blades to make themselves more resilient to the difficult situations that they were to face.

    There is a similar concept when it comes to immune systems. Most plants and animals have evolved sophisticated immune systems that respond to pathogens in the surrounding environment. Having a complex immune response is especially important in dense populations where disease and parasites can quickly spread. One such situation is with crop species.

    Crops, where individuals from one species are packed tightly together, are targets for various pest species that can infect an individual and easily move to the next. For the last 100 years or so we have had the luxury of applying chemicals to help keep the plants healthy by reducing pathogens. This is no longer an an attractive option as it once was as pathogens have become resistant and people have become less tolerant of nasty chemicals in their landscapes and food sources.

    One solution is to create induced resistance through biological and chemical inducers. These inducers can artificially trigger immune defences and enhance their responses. For example, grape crops can suffer from downy mildew. Chitosan, a sugar obtained from the shell of crabs, can be sprayed on vines, triggering immune responses that can reduce downy mildew by 90%, compared to what would happen if grapes responded ‘normally’!

    “His little sword was something new in the way of stings for them. How it darted to and fro! It shone with delight as he stabbed at them.” The Hobbit, JRR Tolkien (Image by J. Catlin)

    Just like the blades of Westernesse helped the hobbits, these inducers allow the individuals to respond faster, more intensely, and achieve more than they would otherwise be able to do. Some inducers are useful for a variety of pathogens in many crops, such as Acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM), and some are very specific, such as Saccharomyces yeast extract.

    Helen Rees, Lincoln University, and colleagues from Plant and Food, University of Auckland, and Scotland’s Rural College have put together a review in the journal Phytopathology about where the field of induced resistance in crop species stands. They look at what has worked on particular crops and the future roles and opportunities for inducers. They conclude that it is an exciting time for this field and that future crop protection may revolve around the next generation of inducers, playing a pivotal role in moving to a reduced pesticide future.

    While inducers may not have the glamour of a Bilbo using Sting to free dwarves from giant spider webs in Mirkwood, they have world-wide contributions to make to feeding a hungry planet by countering the ravening hordes of crop pathogens. Cutting edge indeed!

    Adrian Paterson is a lecturer in Pest-Management and Conservation at Lincoln University. He likes Sting (both in the Lord of the Rings and in The Police).

  • Farming and biodiversity: what’s on 0.5% of Canterbury Plains?

    Imagine the Canterbury Plains blanketed in tall trees interwoven with small hardwoods. This beautiful, unique landscape is then singed into dry grassland with the arrival of Māori. Continue to imagine European settlers introduce weedy exotics that infest the landscapes, once again modifying the region. Now, picture the current landscape – a monotonous cover of dairy farms. Which of these images would you think is best for our native and endemic species?

    Prior to humans or today? (Think from an insect’s perspective)

    The plains have been a dynamic landscape ever since humans stepped foot in our vulnerable country. They will continue to experience dramatic changes in the future with the ever growing population leading to climate change, urban expansion and agriculture intensification.

    The 1940s saw the commencement of irrigation on the plains so that farmers could have a reliable water source to enhance the production of pasture and crops. Water facilitated the development of dairying from sheep farming, into the landscape we see today. Between 2002 and 2012, the Canterbury herd increased by 115%, accounting for 13.5% of the Aotearoa dairy herd.

    These drastic landscape changes have been detrimental to many of our precious native species by creating unfavourable conditions and habitats, species such as the bellbird (Anthornis melanura) have suffered. Some species, such as paradise shelducks (Tadorna variegata), have exploded in population numbers due to the favorable wet conditions caused from irrigating.

    Within the Canterbury Plains, less than 0.5% of this area is still the original remnant forest. Canterbury has been described as the most biological deprived and most modified environment in Aotearoa due to the intensification of agriculture. However, agriculture is a big portion of the country’s economy, bringing in approximately $10.6 billion (5%) of the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

    The food and fiber sector are major employer, providing jobs to over 359,000 people. Not only does it feed New Zealanders, it is also a big player in the global food market. in order to come to terms with this environmental dilemma, farms need to incorporate more sustainable agricultural practices, to feed the world and to support biodiversity. Currently through education and awareness this is already becoming a point of discussion.

    There has been a push to introduce native vegetation into farming systems. Several studies have examined the impacts of intensive dairy farming on soil health, vegetation, and life below ground. Farmers are now starting to see the benefits of even simple things, such as planting native vegetation. Such plantings not only positively impact farms, but also our are good for our native species, from small bugs to cryptic skinks and chatty birds.

    Mike Bowie from Lincoln University, like me, grew up on a family farm, and went on to tertiary education in ecology. This brings a helpful perspective to topics around the interaction of agriculture and ecology. It led Bowie to check out the biodiversity in the Bankside dryland remnant that is surrounded by an intensive dairy farming landscape. The Bankside Scientific Reserve in a 2.6-hectare area established in 1969. Mike wanted to know how adjacent agricultural land impacts the soil composition and fauna in this reserve area.

    Aerial photograph of the Bankside Scientific Reserve with kānuka and matagouri dotted throughout. (From Bowie et al., 2015)

    In 1970, an initial vegetation survey was conducted by Molloy within the new reserve. Bowie’s survey in 2015 found that only 31% of plants that Molloy surveyed still remained and that 27 new exotic species were present. The fauna found in the remnant were different to that of the neighbouring agricultural land. Bowie discovered the presence of four native earthworm species along with six exotic species. The number of the exotic worm species decreased with distance into the reserve.

    Bowie and his fellow researchers found 112 specimens of invertebrates, including many beetles as well as a significant native species, the ground weta! Soil pH, nitrate, and phosphate levels were all lower in the reserve compared to the surrounding paddocks.

    These observations highlight the need to retain existing dryland remnants and to establish other reserves throughout the plains. A diverse landscape will support a diverse range of species. I think farmers and the community are now starting to see the value of incorporating native vegetation and agroecological principles into their system, such as mixed species pasture systems.

    We don’t all need to put three hectares away into a reserve. Even small steps, such as planting a row of diverse natives along a fence line or waterway, will make a huge difference, if many farms join in.

    One thing that is highlighted in this study is the need for continued maintenance of restoration and remnant projects. It is not a plant and leave situation (no pun was intended…). Weed and pest control should be continually applied in these areas to prevent exotic weeds and animals from becoming established and smothering and displacing the natives.

    An example of this is in practice Te Ara Kakariki group that is establishing green dots (tiny native areas) from the Southern Alps to Lake Ellesmere/Te Waihora on private properties. This increases the connectivity of native planting, further increasing the power that these small areas can make overall. Animals and invertebrates will be able to spread throughout these dots and over the region.

    Farming has transformed the landscape of the Canterbury Plains. Image from Adrian Paterson.

    Farmers are becoming more aware of sustainable principles through education from organisations such as Te Ara Kakariki, DairyNZ, Landcare trust, and councils. Through education, ecology is becoming more interwoven into their practices. It will be a trick balancing the need for feeding the world and protecting the environment. Ecology is an excellent way to find this balance in agriculture, it can be adapted to any farming system to suit their needs and desires.

    Mike wants to help bridge this gap, not only in this study, but also others that he has conducted throughout his time at Lincoln University. Mike has examined how native plantings encourage native and beneficial invertebrates on Canterbury dairy farms, plus many more. I too believe that ecology and agriculture can work together to create a more sustainable agriculture sector that can efficiently produce food and improve food security, whilst supporting the health of the soil, water and biodiversity.

    This article was prepared by Master of Science postgraduate student Sam Fitzgerald as part of her ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

    Further reading

    Practical guide for landowner and farmers for landcare

    Improving biodiversity – Beef + lamb

  • Small animals show us the value of old natural forests

    Hambach. You are in Germany right now, halfway between Cologne and the Belgian border. I’d like to warmly welcome you to the Hambach forest – an ancient forest that is dominated by oak and hornbeam, representing a rare forest type in modern Germany. The Hambach forest is the last remnant of a forest that ranged over wide flat plains since the end of the last ice age around 12,000 years ago. Regrettably, it has become famous for being gradually absorbed by a vast hole!

    Tree house in the Hambach forest.
    CC BY-NC 2.0 by Tim Wagner, Flickr

    The Hambach forest used to range over an area of around 5 500 ha. During the past four decades, around 90 percent has already vanished. What remains today is not a normal forest anymore – idyllic, undisturbed, and peaceful. The forest is not only threatened by further sliding into the hole. In 2018, the Hambach forest also became the stage for one of the largest major police operations, owing to another curiosity about the Hambach forest: it is inhabited by people, living in tree houses. Occupying the forest, they want to protect what is left of it and demonstrate against the further expansion of the hole. However, since the forest is privately owned by the company that sacrifices it for the hole, activists were forced out of the forest with the help of police power – before occupying it again.

    So what is the gigantic hole? It is the result of four decades of open-cast coal mining in the Hambach region. However, its further growth will eventually take an end. For the year 2038, Germany has committed itself to complete the coal phase-out, a critical step for Germany’s energy transition. Until then, coal power stations in Germany can be fuelled by coal – extracted from German coal mines (“holes”), with a spectacularly bad impact on the climate. Still, based on the coal-phase out, the remaining part of the Hambach forest can be saved.

    Hambach open-cast coal mining hole.
    CC BY-SA 2.0 by Traveling Tourist, Flickr

    Growing up close to the Hambach forest, that received international attention in the environmental and climate movement, I’ve been concerned about one question for a very long time: How can we replace an ancient forest that is destroyed for mining purposes?

    “If we are moving several villages, people, and a motorway for the open-cast coal mining, why don’t we also move the forest?” That is how people in my region would have addressed this question in the past. Believe me or not, that’s exactly what has been done. At one end of the gigantic hole, the largest artifical hill worldwide was created and recultivated with trees. It serves the region now as a recreation area, comprising an about 70km network of hiking trails. “Forest is forest. There is no difference”, people say in my region. So why be concerned?

    But is it really that easy? Are humans really able to shape a new forest within a few years as a replacement for a destroyed ancient forest, that has the same value for biodiversity and people? And will the planted trees provide an appropriate habitat for all mammals, birds, insects, spiders, herbs, lichens and other important life forms that used to inhabit the lost forest?

    In many countries around the world, there are nowadays regulations regarding compensation and restoration measures that mining and other companies have to fulfil when their activities destroy land. However, in reality, is it always possible to restore an ecosystem that has undergone complete degradation from a natural forest to a mining site, back to its original state and biodiversity value? Otherwise, it is possible to shape a new ecosystem with the same values at another site – like it was aimed with the planted artifical hill as a compensation for the destruction of the Hambach forest? Fortunately, there are ecologists who have learned the answers to these questions. Closely monitoring the process of ecosystem restoration they can tell how successful undertaken restoration efforts are for biodiversity.

    So, now that we’ve already practiced thinking in great dimensions, let’s undertake a great jump to another mined forest – we’re jumping off Germany, over Italy and the Mediterranean Sea, crossing the Arabian Peninsula and the Indian Ocean, passing Australia and are finally landing in… Auckland! Well done! We’re standing here at the Hunua Quarry site, near Papakura in South Auckland. It is part of the Hunua ranges that consist of over 20 000 ha of native forest, comprising tawa, podocarp, kauri–hard beech, and taraire forest as main vegetation types.

    The Hunua Ranges.
    CC BY-NC 2.0 by Neil Hunt, Flickr

    The Hunua Quarry is managed by Winston Aggregates, New Zealand’s largest aggregates provider. As a restoration measure, in six years over 140 000 plants have been planted in this highly modified habitat after quarrying. The aim is to provide a new forest as a replacement of the forest area destroyed. Next to the restoration area, you can still recognize unrestored areas of exotic grassland that have established after quarrying, as well as undisturbed mature native forest.

    Researchers from Lincoln University (Mike Bowie and colleagues) studied the invertebrate communities at Hunua Quarry, including wetas, beetles, cockroaches, crickets, spiders, centipedes, earthworms, ants, flies, mites, moths, slugs and snails, amongst many others. Although rather small animals, invertebrates are essential for the functioning and health of ecosystems, thereby making an important contribution to biodiversity. The objective of their study was to develop a better technique for the assessment of restoration success after mining, using invertebrates as bioindicators. Bioindicators are species that react sensitively to changes in their environment so that they can be used to assess the quality of an ecosystem.

    The researchers collected invertebrates in the undisturbed mature forest, in restored areas, as well as in the unrestored exotic grassland. They compared how many and which invertebrates were living in the respective areas. Interestingly, the undisturbed mature forest, the restored areas, and the unrestored exotic grassland were characterized by very different invertebrate communities. The invertebrates found in the six-year-old restored areas were mostly still very unlike those found in the undisturbed mature forest. For instance, the researchers were able to collect eight times more cave weta in their pitfall traps in the undisturbed mature forest than in the restored areas. In addition to cave wetas, the mature forest also harboured many spiders and beetles. Hence, if the forest restoration process is successful, it is expected that more cave weta, spiders and beetles typical for mature forest will inhabit the restored sites in the next years. At the same time, fewer exotic snails, slugs and earthworms that were found to be characteristic for the unrestored exotic grasslands are expected.

    This beetle,
    Holcaspis mucronata,
    was found most abundant in the mature forest.
    CC BY 4.0 by Birgit E. Rhode, Wikimedia Commons

    The study identified several invertebrate species as bioindicators. These can be used in future studies to assess the success of forest restoration at mine or quarrying sites. The study findings have been recognized in several other invertebrate studies of different parts of the world, for example, in a global synthesis on how good forestry plantations are at providing habitats to native beetles in comparison to natural forests. In that study, restoration sites were considered as forestry plantations, being planted by humans for conservation purposes and therefore different from natural forests. Another study dealt with the effect of removing an invasive plant as a restoration measure on an Mediterranean island. It referred to the study at Hunua Quarry for the use of beetles as bioindicators to observe the effects of restoration.

    All in all, the study showed that invertebrates might tell us more about the quality of a forest than you would easily see yourself. Hence, studying invertebrates as bioindicators has great potential for making better decisions in ecosystem management and for restoration projects. I hope that research about restoration will also raise public awareness for the complexity of biodiversity and the needs for appropriate habitats. Perhaps, I will hear many people around the Hambach forest region in Germany say: “Forest is not like forest. We need to consider old natural forests as valuable habitats and save them from vanishing, not only for the sake of spiders and beetles.”

    This article was prepared by Master of International Nature Conservation student Vivien Michel as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

    Link to the research article:

    Bowie M, Stokvis E, Barber K, Marris J, Hodge S. 2018. Identification of potential invertebrate bioindicators of restoration trajectory at a quarry site in Hunua, Auckland, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 43.

    Read more:

    Donahue, Michelle Z. 2018. Is Germany’s Hambach Forest Doomed by Coal? National Geographic, April 13. https://web.archive.org/web/20190914181247/https:/www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2018/04/hambach-forest-germany-logging-coal-conservation-science/

    Coal exit will save Hambach Forest: activists. Deutsche Welle, January 27, 2019. https://www.dw.com/en/german-coal-exit-plan-will-save-hambach-forest-activists-say/a-47251256

  • From stinky van adventures to restoration projects – the unseen potential of wastewater

    Picture this: you’re on a camping trip, enjoying the breathtaking view of one of the most beautiful lakes of Aotearoa New Zealand surrounded by snow-capped mountains, watching the incredible red colours of the sunrise, when suddenly a ghastly smell permeates the air. You quickly discover the source – a full wastewater tank in your camping van that urgently needs to be emptied.

    My friend Julia as she is emptying out the wastewater tanks of her van. Photo by Flora Brumen

    For those who have not experienced the dreadful smell of such a full wastewater tank, know that this is not easily forgotten. Standing in line at a dumping station, waiting to take your turn to get rid of your own disgusting fluids while someone is emptying their toilet container right in front of you, is a situation that brings shared discomfort to campers.

    Now, I may be exaggerating a little now, but you understand my point. Toilet tanks include so many chemicals, that it actually smells better than the tanks that collect just the wastewater from doing the dishes. However, it’s an experience that highlights the less glamorous side of camping but still unites people in their shared discomfort. It reminds us that wastewater is an unavoidable reality that affects us all, every day, not just while camping.

    The impact of wastewater goes beyond our noses. Uncontrolled discharge of wastewater poses a threat to human health, native freshwater species and ecosystems. In New Zealand, treated wastewater is often released into waterways or the ocean. Unfortunately, this can contaminate recreational surface waters with harmful bacteria and viruses.

    The consequences of this pollution are significant. Many popular swimming spots in Canterbury have been ranked unsuitable for swimming due to high levels of bacteria from human sewage found in the water. Last summer, heavy rainfall events worsened the situation, leading to increased runoff of faecal pathogens. Besides creating severe threats to human health and creating unsuitable recreational areas, the pollution also harms freshwater species and degrades aquatic ecosystems. In fact, a devastating 76% of the indigenous freshwater fish species are endangered or threatened, 46% of all lakes have poor water quality and 45% of New Zealand’s rivers are not suitable for swimming activities.

    What if we could turn the tables and use wastewater to actually help save our ecosystems? That’s exactly what a recent study under the direction of Alexandra Meister, a bio-waste scientist from ESR and the University of Canterbury, in collaboration with the Christchurch City Council and Lincoln University, suggests.

    The researchers carried out an experiment on Banks Peninsula, where they irrigated a site with native plant species with treated wastewater from the local treatment plant for three years. The research team made an exciting discovery: the native plants experienced significant growth with this wastewater regime. In fact, their plant height increased by an impressive 10% compared to plants not irrigated with treated wastewater.

    Site of the field experiment on Banks Peninsula, that was irrigated with treated wastewater. Photo by Meister, Gutierrez-Gines, Robinson (Kiwiscience)

    It doesn’t stop there. The soil at the experimental site showed no signs of an increase of potentially harmful elements – beyond what is normal in the soil – that could endanger humans or the environment. There may be exciting possibilities for combining restoration projects with wastewater application to land. By doing so, we could decrease the discharge of wastewater into our water bodies, but also promote the growth of native vegetation, leading to a potential recovery of native biodiversity.

    Of course, establishing native plants in these environments can be challenging if the species are not adapted to highly fertile soil conditions that are created by treated wastewater irrigation. One particular native plant, Mānuka (Leptospermum scoparium), was an obvious candidate for this experiment. This species has the ability to eliminate harmful soil pathogens and reduce the amount of nitrate leaking into water. Even though mānuka is not adapted to such nutrient-rich conditions, typically growing in low-fertility soils instead, the species responded well to irrigation and increased their growth.

    The success and safety of applying treated municipal wastewater to the land depend on two key factors: the quality of the wastewater and the characteristics of the local environment. Due to these unique considerations, it is crucial that each system is designed to specifically address these factors.

    Going forward, the researchers will continue their investigation by exploring various plants and soil types. They will continue to explore different plants and soil types, expanding our understanding of where and how wastewater irrigation can be utilised effectively.

    It’s time to shift our perception of wastewater. Instead of viewing it as something unseemly to get rid of, we need to recognize it as a valuable resource that can be multi-purposes. By finding innovative applications for treated wastewater, we can decrease its careless discharge and contribute to saving our environment and ecosystems.

    The success of using treated municipal wastewater as a valuable resource shows us how even the unpleasant smelling wastewater from our camper van adventures something associated with an unpleasant smell can turn into the sweet scent of environmental protection and restoration efforts.

    This article was prepared by Master of International Nature Conservation student Flora Bumen as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

    Meister, A., Li, F., Gutierrez-Gines, M. J., Dickinson, N., Gaw, S., Bourke, M., & Robinson, B. (2022). Interactions of treated municipal wastewater with native plant species. Ecological Engineering, 183, 106741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106741

  • Life near the edge: same dung, different day

    Although I was vaguely aware of dung beetles and their role in the ecosystem, I finally became interested in them while participating in giraffe research in South Africa. I’ll never forget the time when I was finishing up my giraffe work for the day and I stopped to watch a couple of dung beetles who were squabbling over a single ball of dung (poop). What I had perceived to be a relatively gentle disagreement escalated quickly when I watched one demolish the other with a long-time favourite move from the World Wrestling Foundation, the Brainbuster. You know the one.


    Dung beetles play an essential role in the environment. However, they fly a bit under the radar, which is why they are often called nature’s “unsung heroes.” There are over 100 species of dung beetle, each choosing one of three strategies: rolling, tunneling, or dwelling in dung. Not only do they eat and live in animal dung, but they increase the freak by reproducing in it and burying it. This ensures their offspring have plenty of food for when they hatch. 

    As gross as it is, this burying behavior strongly limits the growth of vertebrate parasites, which is tremendously helpful to the rest of the ecosystem. They help remove animal dung from the surface environment with incredible efficiency and speed. In some places, the beetles can eliminate a pile of dung in less than 10 minutes, where the ground would otherwise be carpeted with it.

    Dung beetles are very widespread, found in many different habitats across all continents except Antarctica. Like many species, dung beetles appear to be harmed by the break-up of natural environments. This fragmentation reduces the size of undisturbed, or core, habitat in the centre and creates isolated habitat patches. The environment along the edge of a habitat is usually quite different from the core. In forests, for example, it’s typically windier and sunnier at the edge of the forest than in the centre. 

    Edges are not only susceptible to environmental challenges, but also to human impacts. They are more vulnerable to fire, as well as illegal harvesting or collecting of plants or animals by humans, simply because they are more easily accessible. Some of these impacts along the edges don’t stay localized, but can radiate into the core habitat as well.

    Edges are in fact an important habitat, because they support species that like transitions between different habitats. However, as humans continue to break up large habitats, with roads or communities for example, the amount of edge habitat increases, while core habitat shrinks. This challenges the animals that rely on core habitat. Additionally, the edges of habitats typically support fewer species than the core. We don’t want to consistently change habitats around the world to ones that support similar and fewer species. 

    Buffer zones are areas around a sensitive, often legally protected, environment that are typically managed to reduce edge impacts on the borders of a sensitive area. Sometimes buffer zones have methods to exclude humans or livestock, such as fences. Sometimes they are simply designated areas without active protection measures. Relatively little is understood about how effective buffer zones actually are for some species.

    Back to dung beetles, we typically see fewer individuals and a less diverse group of dung beetles along habitat edges than in the core, because they are a group that tends to be quite affected by human activities. For example, because they are in constant contact with dung, they are exposed to pesticides that livestock ingest, which has been causing population declines. But how do buffer zones impact dung beetle diversity and density along the edge of protected habitats?

    Andrew Barnes and his colleagues, including the late Rowan Emberson from Lincoln University, decided to find out. The montane rainforests in Sub-Saharan Africa are shrinking rapidly, largely due to deforestation for agriculture and grazing. There is also nearby habitat decline that often comes with agriculture. The Ngel Nyaki forest reserve in Nigeria is a heavily fragmented area. To test how dung beetles would respond to increasing edge effects, the researchers applied experimental habitat restoration treatments to certain areas along the edges. For the restoration, researchers excluded livestock with fencing, created and maintained firebreaks to help block fire, and allowed passive natural regrowth of the floral community. This combined restoration occurred in 200 metre buffer zones over the course of three years.

    The impact of these buffer zones was remarkable. In the forest next to the restoration area, the dung beetle population size increased by over 50% compared to the unrestored areas. Perhaps more important was the difference between dung beetle populations in the edge and habitats. Before the restoration, there were many more species of dung beetles in the habitat core and relatively few in the edge. After the restoration, that difference disappeared, meaning that the buffer zones successfully mitigated the challenges that are typical of edges for dung beetles. The restoration also led to the return of certain species that had previously locally disappeared in the degraded habitat.

    These changes are incredibly pronounced and occurred after only three years and with small levels of restoration. While firebreaks do require active maintenance, it is encouraging that even relatively minor land-use changes around protected areas can make a world of difference for many species. Relatively few studies have been completed about the effectiveness of buffer zones, so this is a single, but vital, drop in a much larger pot of conservation decisions. 

    After all, we want all dung beetle species to survive, no matter how gross or freaky, to tidy up after vertebrates and perhaps to get more inspiration for wrestling moves.

    This article was prepared by Master of International Nature Conservation student Julia Criscuolo as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

    Barnes, A.D., Emberson, R.M., Chapman, H.M., Krell, F-T., & Didham, R.K. (2014). Matrix habitat restoration alters dung beetle species responses across tropical forest edges. Biological Conservation, 170: 28-37. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.006

  • Making a splash: Protecting the manu with Mānuka and Kānuka

    The art and joy of bombing off a bridge. Photo: Gen Toop. Dec, 2022

    “Do a manu” “Do a bomb”. On a hot summers day these are the chants that ring out across Aotearoa as packs of kids and adults line up on bridges or climb atop rocks and get ready to jump into a lake or a river. A ‘bomb’ or a ‘manu’ is a very precise manoeuvre that involves jumping from somewhere high, curling into a ball and making the biggest splash you can when you hit the water. Some would argue that a manu involves more technical aerial acrobatics than a simple bomb. Either way, the bomb or the manu is a rite of passage for many New Zealand kids.

    But increasingly this treasured national pastime is under threat. The Ministry for the Environment painted a grim picture of waterway health in its recent Our Freshwater report. Nearly half of New Zealand’s lakes are in poor or very poor health. Only two in every hundred lakes are in good or very good health. Many rivers have become so polluted that they are now unsafe for swimming at times. And it is not only humans who can no longer safely swim in some of the country’s rivers. Native freshwater fish are struggling to survive. More than three-quarters of them are threatened with extinction.

    The native freshwater birds that depend on rivers, lakes and estuaries, are also in peril. More than two thirds of them are threatened with extinction or at risk of becoming threatened. Introduced predators, like trout and stoats, are one of the main culprits behind the decline in native freshwater fish and bird populations. The degradation of freshwater habitat by pollution is another driver that is pushing these precious species closer to extinction. Cleaning up waterways is important not only for protecting the long-held tradition of doing a ‘manu’, it’s also critical to the protection ngā manu (the birds) of Aotearoa.

    Algal Bloom in the Waikirikiri, Selwyn River. Photo Credit: Gen Toop. Jan 2021

    Nitrogen pollution is one of the leading causes of the degradation of New Zealand’s freshwater ecosystems. When excess nitrogen on the land seeps down through the soil past the rootzone of plants it can get into the groundwater. From there it can move into the aquifers that many communities and cities get their drinking water from, or it can re-emerge in springs and get into lakes and rivers. Once in those lakes and rivers nitrogen can cause algal blooms, which can suck oxygen out of the water making it difficult for freshwater fish to survive. These algal blooms also make rivers a lot less appealing for jumping into on a hot summers day. Some algae are even toxic and can cause human health issues as well as kill sensitive animals like dogs.

    There are lots of different forms of nitrogen, but one of the main forms that leaches in this way is nitrate. The vast bulk of nitrate pollution getting into New Zealand’s freshwater comes from agriculture. That’s mainly because New Zealand’s pastures are loaded up with synthetic nitrogen fertiliser and the urine of the livestock feeding on these pastures has huge amounts of nitrogen in it. When livestock, particularly dairy cows, urinate the plants can’t always use all the nitrogen for their growth and so the excess nitrate can leach into waterways.

    Mānuka (Leptospernum scoparium) flowers. Photo Credit: Vil Sandi, Flickr, licensed under CC-BY-ND 2.0

    A promising new solution to this nitrate leaching problem has been explored by researchers from Lincoln University, Canterbury University and Plant and Food Research. In 2017, the scientists simulated a dairy cow urinating (not something many of us do in our day jobs) and compared the nitrate leaching rates under three tree species that could be planted into dairy pastures; radiata pine (an exotic species), mānuka (native) and kānuka (native). They found that mānuka and kānuka leached far lower amounts of nitrogen (2 kg/ha) than pine (53 kg/ha).

    Speaking about the project Dr Juergen Esperschuetz, the lead researcher from Lincoln university said, “These results show mānuka and kānuka could be even more effective at protecting water systems than anyone expected.”

    Intentionally planting trees into pasture where animals continue to graze is a farming system called silvopasture. Silvo is derived from the latin word for forest and pasture, well we all know what that is. Silvopasture is not just about shelterbelts, windbreaks, and riparian buffers, systems which relegate trees to the margins of a farm. Instead, silvopasture systems often plant trees into the paddock itself. It has been said that silvopasture, and other agroforestry systems like it, represent a shift away from monocultural production and towards an agricultural system that more closely mimics natural forest ecosystems. Mānuka and kānuka are native trees to Aotearoa so incorporating them into dairy pastures also provides a way to bring more native biodiversity back into farming landscapes.

    The researchers also found that soils under the mānuka and kānuka emit far less nitrous oxide, with the mānuka soils emitting the least of the three. Nitrous oxide is an extremely potent greenhouse gas, it is long lived and in Aotearoa, the vast bulk of nitrous oxide emissions come from livestock farming. So planting mānuka and kānuka into dairy pastures could also help in the fight against climate change. On top of that, both trees produce high-value products in the form of oils and honey and that could be used to supplement farm income.

    Cows grazing in a silvopasture. Photo Credit: Gayle Weaver,pixabay.com, licensed under CCO

    Since the publication of this study, other researchers have gone on to use parts of its methodology and draw on its findings in their research. In the Wairarapa, a study done in the field found much lower nitrate levels under manuka than under pasture, corroborating the findings from this glasshouse study done by Dr Esperchuetz and his team. In Spain, researchers also drew on the study when they investigated nitrate leaching risk under walnut silvopasture.

    This study has added to the toolkit of options available to help reduce the environmental impact of pastoral farming in Aotearoa. Incorporating mānuka and kānuka trees into pastures will not only bring biodiversity into farming landscapes. Thanks to this research, we now know it will likely help clean up our lakes and rivers too, protecting both ngā manu and the manu now and into the future.

    This article was prepared by Master of Science postgraduate student Genevieve Toop as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

    You can read the full article here: Esperschuetz, J., Balaine, N., Clough, T., Bulman, S., Dickinson, N. M., Horswell, J., & Robinson, B. H. (2017). The potential of L. scoparium, K. robusta and P. radiata to mitigate N-losses in silvopastural systems. Environmental pollution, 225, 12-19.

  • Can mushrooms save our planet from burping cows?

    Ever since I was a small child, I have listened to people talk about global warming and climate change. Back then I had no idea what it meant. Was our planet going to catch on fire? Were we all going to die? And why did no one seem to agree if it was fact or fiction?

    I come from a family of old school sheep and beef farmers that believed it to be a myth, or at least an over-exaggerations by scientists. As I grew up, I became increasingly more inquisitive, always asking how could something as large as our planet be warming? And what could be the cause?

    Burning earth globe west hemisphere. By Boris Ryaposov. © Adobe Stock #45170848, used with license

    Many of my questions were left unanswered until I started high school and discovered science. Straight away I fell in love with its explanations for how everything functioned. Everything from the stars in the sky right down to the soil beneath our feet (and even further down to the centre of the earth).

    Global warming quickly became a topic that piqued my interest. The more I learnt, the more obvious it became that it was a very real, very serious problem. What exactly is global warming? Thankfully, the planet isn’t going to literally catch on fire like I once thought (although fires will be more likely). The temperature of our planet is slowly increasing each year due to ‘dirty industries‘ pumping pollutants, called greenhouse gases (GHGs), into the atmosphere.

    These gasses end up trapping heat from the sun, rather than it being reflected back into space. This heat warms the atmosphere, resulting in extreme weather events becoming more frequent . This means more forest fires, droughts, floods and heatwaves, which combined have disastrous effects on the environment and negatively affect many peoples’ lives.

    Methane emissions! 牛のゲップ、メタンガス排出のイラスト. By MAYUK0. © Adobe Stock #488498751, used with license.

    Studying environmental science at university has taught me all of the main contributors to this problem. A major issue for New Zealand (NZ) is the gas methane. Methane makes up the majority of NZ’s agricultural GHG emissions, and it often comes from farm animals, such as sheep and cows. These animals produce methane during their digestive process and release it into the air by burping! Scientists have estimated that 40% of the total warming effect generated by human activities is due to methane.

    Under the Climate Change Act, NZ must reduce methane emissions from agriculture by 10% by 2030, and within the range of 24-47% reduction by 2050 (NIWA). Hence finding methods to reduce the amount of methane produced by animals is particularly important.

    The paper by K.T. Rangubhet and colleagues in the Journal Animal Feed Science and Technology found that by adding spent mushroom substrate (SMS) to cow food, that their methane emissions were significantly reduced.

    Mushroom substrate refers to the waste generated from mushroom production and is usually found in abundance after a mushroom harvesting period. The chemical composition of the mushrooms affects an animal’s fermentation and ecology. A useful byproduct of this is reduced amounts of methane burped into the atmosphere. Applying SMS to the feed of dairy cows could reduce the amount of emissions that animals contribute to greenhouse gases.

    Fungi – an image by Adrian Paterson

    Adding spent mushroom substrate uses diet and nutrition as a method to reduce GHG emissions throughout NZ. It is an approach that could allow our country to achieve the reduction goal set by the climate change act. Since this is in the next 8 years, SMS may be able to help NZ achieve these goals, especially as it is cost-effective and easy to apply. Other approaches are herd management, where animal breeds are selected that can utilise food more efficiently, and emit less methane. The strategy also includes reducing the number of unproductive animals in a herd to improve profitability.

    If these methods continue to show promise by substantially reducing methane emissions from dairy cows, this could be applied to farms throughout NZ. SMS could make a real difference to this country’s effort to prevent climate change due to GHG. This could then be part of a global solution to help to mitigate climate change and slow down our planet’s increasing temperature.

    The author Polly Cavanagh is a postgraduate student in the Master of Science -Environmental Science taught at Lincoln University. This article was written as an assessment for ECOL 608 Research Methods in Ecology.