Dirt was one of my first friends. My earliest days were spent collecting worms from the backyard and trying to convince my parents I hadn’t done any dirt taste testing that day (I probably had, but for purely scientific reasons). I was fascinated by what seemed like an entirely different world in the soil of my parent’s garden. I could find all kinds of goodies from insects to plant roots.
At university I was introduced to the truly magical world in soil: microbes. Although not visible to the naked eye, the tiny worlds inhabited by fungi, bacteria, viruses, and other unbelievably small things, should not be overlooked. These tiny worlds are called the microbial community and they have important roles in New Zealand forests.
A good place to start thinking about microbial communities is our own bodies. Most people have heard of their gut microbiome. The microbes in our digestive system are important for our health from immune function to digestion (especially for dirt tasters). However, some microbes, such as the COVID-19 virus, can make us sick. Soil microbes in forests are not so different.
Forests are dependent on microbes that cycle nutrients, decompose waster, and aid plants in nutrient uptake. Like humans and the common cold, some soil microbes hurt their associated plants. An example of this is kauri dieback disease, a disease spread by a spore in the soil that attacks tree roots and trunks. This disease hinders the tree’s ability to uptake and transport nutrients, essentially starving and killing the tree. Kauri dieback is incurable and fatal for kauri.
Tāne Mahuta, the largest surviving kauri. Photo by Jodie Wiltse (Author)
Kauri dieback is named after the tree it infects, New Zealand’s mighty kauri tree. The Department of Conservation explains that kauri can grow up to 16 m in circumference and live over 2000 years. The legendary status of kauri is clear in the language used to describe them. The largest surviving kauri is called Tāne Mahuta, which means ‘lord of the forest’. If you were to visit Tāne Mahuta today, you would find boot cleaning stations, warning signs, and only be able to view the great tree from a platform. Moreso, entire trails have been shutdown to stop people from spreading soil around kauri. Why?
A soil microbe, Phytophthora agathidicida, travels under the name of kauri dieback. This microbe cannot be seen with the naked eye but has the power to kill tremendously large kauri trees. In humans, the heroic microbes of our immune system save us when nasty microbes make us sick. Are there unseen heroes hiding in the soil that can help kauri?
During a PhD project at Lincoln University, Dr. Alexa Byers studied soil microbial communities under kauri to find out. The goal was to identify microbes that suppress kauri dieback and can aid in kauri conservation.
The first step was to understand how microbial communities under kauri react to kauri dieback disease. Alexa infected kauri seedlings with kauri dieback and looked for changes in the soil microbial community. When humans are attacked by illness causing microbes, our immune system amps up to protect us. When soils were infected, Alexa found bacteria that were involved in disease suppression. This was a promising result suggesting that heroic soil microbes could build up their numbers to fight off kauri dieback.
Next, Alexa looked into how specific strains of bacteria from kauri soil impacted the development of kauri dieback. She identified Paraburkholderiaand Penicillium microbes that inhibited the growth of kauri dieback in soils. Paraburkholderia are known to enhance plant growth and fix nitrogen. Penicillium are fungi that can kill or stop growth of other bacteria. We officially have some heroic contenders!
The battles between heroic microbes and kauri dieback in the soil could determine the fate of the kauri above them. Hopefully, researchers can find a way to rig microbial battles in favour of these unseen heroes. More research is needed to determine their true potential, but these soil microbes could be called to action in the near future.
The world under kauri is just one example of fascinating soil microbes. Soil microbes have been found to be key for carbon storage, impact the taste of tea, and reduce nitrogen runoff from agriculture, among many other amazing things. This is your reminder to appreciate the little things, even the things so little you cannot see them. Next time you play in a garden or walk through a forest, I hope you take a moment to think about all the tiny microbes working away in the soil to help (or hinder) plants and make the natural world work.
Research Paper: Byers, A.K. (2021). The soil microbiota associated with New Zealand’s kauri (Agathis australis) forests under threat from dieback disease: A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Lincoln University. Lincoln University. https://hdl.handle.net/10182/13887
“Wilderness was the basic ingredient of American culture. From the raw materials of the physical wilderness, Americans built a civilization. With the idea of wilderness they sought to give their civilization identity and meaning.” – Roderick Nash, Wilderness and the American Mind
Since the advent of the wilderness preservation movement in nineteenth-century America, protecting wild places has meant more than simply protecting pristine ecosystems. Despite the priceless value our world’s rapidly diminishing untouched landscapes hold for biodiversity conservation, wilderness preservation has first and foremost been a cultural mission.
Doubtful Sound, Fiordland National Park – Rod Waddington, licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0
Roderick Nash described wilderness not as a type of ecosystem but as a “state of mind.” Investigating this mindset reveals much about our reasons for protecting nature and what nature means to our society. The people of New Zealand decided very early on that its natural landscapes were worth protecting, especially its most wild and remote places. Wilderness areas are now considered a “defining characteristic” of New Zealand, with many citizens feeling a sense of “pride” and “identity” with these wild areas.
Wild nature, as opposed to pastoral or modified landscapes, provides many people a source of connection to the natural world that transcends typical nature amenity values. People who visit wilderness areas report experiences of the sublime, of incredible beauty, of solitude and personal growth, of the unrivalled rewards of physical challenge and overcoming risk, and of a connection with nature that is no less than spiritual. But while wild places are by definition areas with as little human modification as possible, their preservation and meaning in society are entirely human.
University of Lincoln researcher Kerry Wray wrote their doctoral thesis on the meaning behind New Zealander’s relationship with wilderness. Kerry identified how differences in wilderness valuation say much about the country’s human-nature relationship and its internal conflicts. Wray’s thesis covers how reasons for conserving nature can come from our desire for a life of meaning and connection and how this desire can direct the course of an entire nation.
Nations, as well as individuals, look to their landscapes for identity. Where we come from often says much about who we are. New Zealand became one of the first countries in the world to establish national parks, starting in 1892. The government enacted legislation that officially recognised national parks as “areas of New Zealand that contain scenery of such distinctive quality, ecological systems or natural features so beautiful, unique, or scientifically important that their preservation is in the national interest.” They saw them as so valuable and essential to the essence of the country’s identity that they should also be preserved in “perpetuity.”
Statue of Sir Edmund Hillary in Mount Cook/Aoraki National Park – Geof Wilson, licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
As the country set out to preserve its landscapes it did so in a way that reflected the collective personality of the nation’s citizens. The colonial inhabitants of this land saw themselves as pioneers and explorers. As the country transitioned from colony to statehood, it looked for ways to distinguish itself. It looked towards its unpeopled valleys, deep fjords, and soaring peaks.
Vast swathes of wild New Zealand were and remain unlike any environment in Europe and the people that explored them saw themselves as likewise distinct. The country aimed to preserve areas for backcountry tramping and hunting, celebrating their cultural love of adventure, self-sufficiency, and exploration. And so, with a provision in the 1952 National Parks Act for remote places, the country became one of the earliest adopters of the wilderness preservation movement in the world, setting aside immense areas with policies more strict than any other country.
There are now 6 designated wilderness areas in the country, with many more remote areas that are effectively managed as wilderness. Wilderness in New Zealand is now, mainly under the 1985 Wilderness Policy, legally considered a place undisturbed by humanity, free from infrastructure including the most basic of modifications, such as huts, bridges, signs, and even tracks.
Wilderness preservation polices have now spread around the world, with leading international conservation organizations emphasising their immense ecological and cultural value, such as the European Commission’s issue of wilderness management guidelines, definitions, and calls for further preservation. The International Union for Conservation of Nature has created a global classification and management guidelines system for wilderness areas. There are also non-profits with storied conservation legacies, such as the Wild Foundation and Wilderness International. It was largely due to the inspired efforts of the Federated Mountain Clubs‘ love of remote back-country experiences that New Zealand wilderness now ranks among the most wild and protected in the world.
The wilderness area of Fiordland National Park, now a World Heritage Area, is the largest and most representative of the country’s wild nature. It was here in 1773 that Captain Cook moored when plotting New Zealand on the world map. It was here in Fiordland that advancements in species conservation were made as early as the nineteenth century with the protection of entire off-shore islands and the conservation efforts of some of the world’s rarest birds, such as the kākāpō and takahē.
In Fiordland, the ethos of wilderness preservation has led to the protection of the largest expanse of native forest in the country. For trampers, it is the most remote one can get on the mainland. However, it is also home to three of the nation’s Great Walks and a national park attracting nearly 1 million visitors a year.
The Darran Mountains, Fiordland National Park – Dan Nelson, licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
“Fiordland National Park represents a legacy of every New Zealander, for every park visitor; a cherished corner of the world where mountains and valleys compete with each other for room, where scale is almost beyond comprehension, rainfall is measured in metres, and scenery encompasses the broadest width of emotions. It is a place of solitude, of retreat, of quiet rejuvenation… Welcome to Fiordland, land of the last retreat” – Department of Lands & Survey 1986
The increasing demand for access to wilderness areas and their peripheries is not only putting pressure on these fragile ecosystems but on users’ values as well. For one person, the Fiordland wilderness means the Milford Highway and they may bemoan the lack of tracks that enter into deeper sections of the park. While for others, wilderness is not reached until hiking several days away from the Park into untracked valleys and may picket propositions to improve trails and build huts. How the Crown decides to manage these conflicting user expectations can direct the course of nature conservation in New Zealand as a whole, a country with more ecotourists and backcountry users every year.
Which values will be prioritised? What interpretation of wilderness will be used in future? And, is the idea of wilderness always appropriate? Can it be harmful?
Sign in Kauri National Park – Eli Duke, licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0
With over a third of the country set aside for conservation and with one of the most extensive and strictly defined wilderness preservation systems in the world, New Zealand is a model case study in the phenomenon of wilderness preservation. But it is a phenomenon that is only beginning to come to terms with its colonial heritage.
That word, wilderness, as well as its connotation, do not translate well out its Germanic language roots. Many people and cultures around the world have differing conceptions and values of wild places. And the Europeans who pioneered the idea paid little attention to human-nature relationships already present in these allegedly pristine or “Edenic” places.
Indigenous peoples were the first to suffer from modern conservation strategies. Not only were they displaced from their lands but their heritage and legacy were ignored or erased. For example, nearly all wilderness areas in the United States were inhabited by native peoples before being designated. The European-American cultural idea of civilization vs wild nature imposed itself atop hundreds of years of indigenous peoples’ heritage with these ‘wild’ places. Wilderness preservation has led to the degradation of global indigenous heritage and even overt oppression.
Countries around the world are now reassessing their relationship with nature conservation, including New Zealand. The future of Fiordland National Park, with its 800-900 year history of Māori inhabitation, has complex and competing human-nature relationships to be considered. Certain conservation lands throughout the country are now being reclaimed by iwi. Concessions are being made to allow customary use of natural resources across Crown Land. Wilderness areas are now being criticised for concealing indigenous heritage and restricting rights.
The wilderness landscape of New Zealand played a large role in the creation of a national identity and a conservation agenda post-independence. Now again the idea of wilderness will play a role in how the country decides to manage its conservation lands and for whom.
Nature conservation in New Zealand means more than saving the endangered birds. It has to do with culture, the quest for identity and beauty, and now, also, justice. There are many definitions of wilderness but all of them speak of a place somehow both lacking in humanity and a place to be sought, a wasteland and a wellspring of emotion, somewhere unmarked by human hands yet telling of our passions.
The road into Aoraki Mount Cook National Park – /\ltus, licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
Kerry’s work is a landmark piece in the academic discussion of New Zealand wilderness management. The many intangible values of wilderness and its environmental justice issues make it a complex idea to study or even casually talk about. Yet, Kerry’s endeavor describes why wilderness values are so important and demonstrates that it is possible to study them and produce substantive ideas for addressing its many complex problems.
William Cronon’s famous critique of wilderness preservation called wilderness a “monument to the nation’s past.” The mounting challenges to conservation lands press our eyes forward. How we decide to value our world’s diminishing wilderness speaks to how we will value nature all together and what the future landscape of this country will look like.
Imagine walking through the lush forests of New Zealand, where native birds sing and the ecosystem thrives. For many, the thrill of hunting deer adds to the adventure, as these animals are both prized game and an integral part of the environment. However, lurking within this paradise are predators, like possums and rats, which threaten the very fabric of this delicate ecosystem.
To combat these problem predators, New Zealand has employed a controversial yet effective method: aerial 1080 poison drops. These toxins are effective against pests but can inadvertently harm other wildlife, including the beloved white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus).
White Tailed Buck. Brad Smith. July 3rd 2006
White-tailed deer are not native to New Zealand; they were introduced for hunting in the early 20th century. Despite being an introduced species, they have established a stable population and have become an important part of New Zealand’s hunting culture, especially the population on Stewart Island. Protecting them is crucial not only for maintaining biodiversity but also for supporting the recreational and economic benefits associated with deer hunting.
Recent studies have shed light on how we can minimise this collateral damage by using deer repellents. Let’s dive into the findings and their implications for both wildlife management and conservation.
New Zealand’s unique biodiversity is under constant threat from invasive species. Possums, rats, and stoats prey on native birds, insects, and plants, disrupting natural ecosystems. To protect these vulnerable species, aerial drops of sodium fluoroacetate, commonly known as 1080, are used. This toxin is highly effective at reducing predator populations, but it’s not without its drawbacks. One significant concern is the unintended by-kill of non-target species, such as the white-tailed deer.
Intensive ground-based searches for white-tailed deer carcasses were conducted in the Dart Valley/Routeburn catchments following the aerial application of 1080 cereal pellets as part of the ‘Battle for the Birds’/Tiakina Ngā Manu predator control program in August 2014. Lincoln University PhD student Kaylyn Pinney, with her supervisors James Ross and Adrian Paterson, organised this search. Four areas, each 100 hectares in size, were searched over four days. The results were published in NZ Journal of Zoology.
To estimate the effectiveness of their search, simulated deer carcasses were used. The success rate for finding these simulated carcasses was 78%. All actual white-tailed deer carcasses found contained traces of 1080 in their muscle tissue (ranging from 0.41 to 1.06 mg/kg). Based on these findings, researchers estimated that approximately 3.85 deer per 400 hectares died from 1080 poisoning. This translates to a potential mortality of about 146 white-tailed deer across the entire 15,215-hectare predator control area. These results suggest that recurrent predator control operations could impact the sustainability of white-tailed deer hunting. (For more on this see ‘Is it fair, for orcs and deer?’)
Repellents are substances designed to deter animals from consuming certain items without causing them harm. In the context of predator control, deer repellents can be coated on 1080 baits to reduce the likelihood of deer ingesting the poison.
Kaylyn Pinney then tested a deer repellent-coated 1080 bait to see if it could reduce the mortality of white-tailed deer during predator control operations. She tested two types of repellents: Epro Deer Repellent (EDR) and Pestex-DR. The study was divided into two parts: trials in a captive herd on the West Coast and monitoring of wild deer fitted with GPS collars in the Dart/Routeburn Valley in Otago, New Zealand.
Routeburn Valley. yiwenjiang26, Routeburn vally closer up. March 10 2007.
In the captive trials, five deer were presented with three types of cereal baits: non-repellent (NR), EDR-coated, and Pestex-DR-coated. The baits were placed in a controlled environment where deer could freely choose among them. The results were promising. The deer showed a clear aversion to the repellent-coated baits, with significantly less consumption compared to the non-repellent baits. The repellents appeared to be effective, though not infallible. One older buck did consume a single EDR-coated bait initially but avoided it afterward.
The second part of the study involved monitoring ten wild deer equipped with GPS collars during a 1080 drop. To fit the deer with GPS collars, Kaylyn and crew captured the animals by tranquilising them and then attached the devices. Kaylyn could now track their movements and monitor their survival. The results were mixed. One deer, the youngest in the study, died from 1080 poisoning, suggesting that body size may play a role in susceptibility to the poison. Importantly, the study confirmed, however, that using EDR significantly reduced deer mortality compared to previous operations without repellents.
While the study shows that repellents can reduce by-kill, there are challenges. Ensuring that every bait is adequately coated with repellent is crucial. Additionally, different deer may react differently to repellents, as observed with the older buck in the captive trial. Kaylyn suggests that using a lower concentration of 1080, such as 0.08%, could further reduce deer mortality, especially for smaller deer.
The study also highlights the importance of understanding deer habitat use. The GPS collars allowed researchers to identify how much time the deer spent in different types of habitats. The varied exposure of the collared deer to the 1080 baits was influenced by their movement patterns and habitat preferences. Future studies should consider these factors to optimise bait distribution and minimize non-target impacts.
1080 Warning Sign. Shaddon Waldie, 1080. July 30th 2009.
These findings have significant implications for wildlife management and conservation in New Zealand. By using deer repellents like EDR and Pestex-DR, we can make predator control operations more targeted and reduce the unintended consequences for non-target species. This approach not only helps protect the native ecosystem but also addresses public concerns about the humane treatment of wildlife.
The study underscores the need for continuous innovation and adaptation in conservation strategies. As we gain more insights into the behaviour and ecology of both target and non-target species, we can develop more effective and sustainable methods to preserve New Zealand’s unique biodiversity.
The journey to protect New Zealand’s native species is complex and challenging. This study offers a glimmer of hope by demonstrating that deer repellents can significantly reduce the by-kill of white-tailed deer during aerial 1080 operations. While not perfect, these findings pave the way for more refined and humane conservation practices. As we continue to balance the needs of predator control with the protection of non-target wildlife, studies like this guide us toward a more sustainable and harmonious coexistence with nature.
Imagine once again walking through those lush forests, now knowing that both the native birds and the majestic deer can thrive in a balanced ecosystem.
This article was prepared by Master of Science postgraduate student Ella Gordon as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.
Link to the main article
Pinney, K. A., Ross, J. G., & Paterson, A. M. (2022). Assessing EDR and a novel deer repellent for reducing by-kill of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), during aerial 1080 operations. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 49(3), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.2021.1978510
Additional Links and Further Reading
New Zealand Department of Conservation
The New Zealand Department of Conservation (DOC) website provides comprehensive information about New Zealand’s natural heritage, conservation efforts, and recreational opportunities. Key sections include:
Parks & Recreation: Information on places to visit, activities, camping, and hiking. Nature: Details on native plants and animals, pest management, and habitats. Get Involved: Volunteering, funding opportunities, and educational resources. Our Work: Conservation projects, research, and monitoring programs.
The Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research website provides a wide range of information on New Zealand’s land environment and biodiversity. It covers research areas such as soil health, water management, biodiversity conservation, and climate change. Additionally, it offers resources for educators, data and mapping tools, and information on various conservation projects. The site also features sections for news, events, and opportunities for public involvement in environmental efforts.
The “1080: An Overview” page on the Predator Free NZ Trust website provides comprehensive information about the use of 1080 (sodium fluoroacetate) in New Zealand for predator control. It details what 1080 is, why it is used, its application methods, and its effectiveness. The page also covers the benefits and risks associated with 1080, including its impact on native species, non-target species, and the environment. Additionally, it includes examples of successful 1080 applications and addresses common concerns such as its impact on drinking water.
Nugent, G., & Yockney, I. (2004). “Feral deer in New Zealand: current status and potential management.” New Zealand Journal of Zoology. This article discusses the status and management of feral deer populations in New Zealand.
Morriss, G. (2007). “Epro Deer Repellent reduces by-kill of deer during aerial 1080 operations.” Landcare Research Report. This report provides detailed findings on the effectiveness of EDR in reducing non-target by-kill.
Frampton, C. M., et al. (1999). “Efficacy of 1080 carrot baits in controlling possums.” New Zealand Journal of Ecology. This study examines the effectiveness of 1080 in controlling possum populations.
Spalinger, D. E., et al. (1997). “Influence of learning and experience on foraging behavior of white-tailed deer.” Journal of Wildlife Management. This research explores how learning and experience affect deer foraging behavior.
Bowen, L. H., et al. (1995). “Leaching rates of 1080 from RS5 cereal baits under simulated rainfall.” New Zealand Journal of Ecology. This paper discusses how environmental conditions affect the concentration of 1080 in baits.
Pinney, M., et al. (2020). “Effectiveness of deer repellents in reducing non-target by-kill during predator control operations.” Journal of Wildlife Management. This study delves into the specific effects of deer repellents on non-target species during 1080 operations.
Blandly pleasant houses flank wide roads. Inoffensive strip gardens line dull driveways and plain, wooden slat fences. Every street is perfectly plain and welcoming. The normal neighbourhood stretches on, unchanging for blocks.
If you have looked for a house, flat, or rental in the past fifteen years, you have visited this suburb.Welcome home.
Does anyone else listen to the Magnus Archives? It’s a fictional horror podcast where an archivist records first hand accounts of people pursued by manifestations of their own fear, including the fear of always being watched, hunted by dark beasts, or being horribly, completely alone. The endless suburbia described above is from one of these accounts: an episode named Cul-de-sac.
Horror employs the unknown, unnatural, and surreal to frighten its audience. I find it disconcerting that modern suburbia is considered uncomfortable enough to feature. Scarily, it works. In this particular account, the writer finds themselves alone in a desolate suburban neighbourhood, absent of life and vigour. Nothing defines one home from the next. Gardens are non-existent, and no other living thing is present. Why is this dull repetitiveness so horrifying?
Our homes define us as much as we define them. When an area is so lacking in character, in life, it ceases to be a place at all. Global trends of urban design (especially in western countries) have spent decades prioritising vehicles over personal well-being, land-use diversity, and ecosystem health. Poor planning has resulted in biologically desolate, emotionally draining landscapes that we spend our entire lives in. Some land uses, such as industrial, are considered incompatible with nature. As a result, suburban design has an imperative theatre to reintroduce biodiversity into our every-day lives.
“The normal just seemed to go on forever.” The Archivist, The Magnus Archives. Episode 150 “Cul-de-sac”. Image: Author. All rights reserved.
In 2008, Maria Ignatieva, Glenn Stewart, and Colin Meurk published an article in the New Zealand Landscape Review titled: “Low Impact Urban Design and Development (LIUDD): Matching Urban Design and Urban Ecology.”They recognised New Zealand’s poor history in applying ecological principles to landscape design, which has led to the depreciation of native biodiversity, landscape legibility, and the tidal wave of invasive exotic organisms. Global trends, such as rewilding in the UK, nurture communities that respect, conserve, and enhance natural processes. This is not easy, as ingrained cultural perceptions of our relationship with ecology are complex. As put by Joan Nassauer in her article Messy Ecosystems, Tidy Frames:
“People may care about improving ecological quality, but not at the expense of the proper perception of their own landscape”
Socio-cultural norms borne from the picturesque design movement still drive perceptions of how landscapes should appear, more than 200 years after they were conceived. To see an iconic picturesque landscape, take a glance at this article on Stourhead Gardens in England. These preconceived values, lack of diversity, and cost-driven urban development result in homogenised, unlively neighbourhoods; perfect habitats for Cthulhu-esque, eldritch beings to consume lonely creatures’ fears in, but less perfect for our native flora and fauna.
Two key methods of Low Impact Urban Design and Development were identified to address these issues: designing for sense of place (to improve public perceptions), and for native biodiversity. As an example, Ignatieva and colleagues suggest the use of ‘plant signatures’ in suburban design. These signatures are assortments of plants that provide context clues of the landscape; species are chosen deliberately to represent the ecological needs and habitat functions of that environment. This contrasts with most plant selections which are often driven by cost, function, or amenity driven calculations. Character and identity are inherent in an ecologically aware plant palette, and designers worth their salt should demonstrate this in thoughtful design choices.
A stormwater system in Te Whāriki subdivision, Lincoln. Image: Author. All rights reserved.
These ideas have been present for decades: plant signatures were coined by Nick Robinson in 1993, and Ignatieva and colleagues’ article was published 16 years ago. So, what effect have Low Impact Urban Design and Development and plant signatures had on increasing urban biodiversity? I met with Colin Meurk, one of the authors, to hear his thoughts. “Low Impact Urban Design and Development is pretty much history, apart from the legacy effect,” he said. “We use different jargon now.” Oh. Right.
The thing is, just because ideas are innovative does not mean they are embraced and applied. In places, Low Impact Urban Design and Development has successfully evolved– Meurk points to stormwater design and ‘sponge cities’ as evidence that ecological concepts can assimilate successfully into current landscape practice.
Te Whāriki in Lincoln is a great example of this: as a result of high clay soil and ground-fed springs, this subdivision needs to detain high levels of stormwater. The standard method to do so is with large grass-mown basins, such as those seen down the road in Wigram. Instead, Te Whāriki is designed with extensive wetland systems that support a wide range of native plants, bird species, and invertebrates. The wetlands also provide excellent public spaces, with walking tracks, seating, and street-inter-connectivity. My own parents chose Te Whāriki as their new home in 2022 specifically for the wetlands!
A path through a stormwater system in Te Whāriki subdivision, Lincoln. Image: Adrian Paterson.
Yet, ecological principles within suburban design are the exception rather than the rule. Is this because ecological action is still viewed in opposition of cultural values, as Nassauer would suggest? Is it that policy makers do not sufficiently emphasise ecological principles, or because developers dislike the financial ‘deadweight’ of ecological oriented design?
I would suggest all three, although there is greater nuance and complexity than I have room to explore here. Notably, Te Whāriki was developed by Ngāi Tahu in conjunction with Lincoln University, both parties whom have a vested interest in increasing biodiversity in the region.
It is disquieting that a common expression of modern living is easily utilised as a metaphor for horror and loneliness. What does it say about modern design that it can easily parallel horror and fear? When we met, Colin Meurk labelled modern subdivisions as an ‘extinction of experience’.
Younger generations are often criticised for spending too much time on technology, but when they live in lonely neighbourhoods, can we blame them? In failing to design for biodiversity, we rob ourselves of opportunities to experience the natural world. Low Impact Urban Design and Development may have been subsumed into other concepts, but designing in a manner conducive to the natural world and people is more relevant than ever. Plant signatures are an excellent method to incorporate biodiversity and character in our suburbs. Birds, invertebrates, reptiles – they would love to take part in our neighbourhoods, and I, for one, would prefer a lively neighbourhood over a horrifying, lonely suburbia.
Life provides. Image: Author. All rights reserved.
This article was prepared by Master of Science postgraduate student Nathan Campbell as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.
Reference Article: Ignatieva, M., Meurk, C. D., & Stewart, G. H. (2008). Low impact urban design and development (LIUDD) : matching urban design and urban ecology. Landscape Review 12(2):61-73.
High in the treetops of a lush forest, a group of native birds gathered together, their vibrant feathers glinting in the dappled sunlight. Excited chirps and melodic trills filled the air as they engaged in a lively conversation. Their voices carried the hopes and dreams of a restored ecosystem.
Koru, a charismatic Tūī with iridescent feathers, fluttered his wings and cleared his throat. “Have you all heard the latest? The Humans are determined to make New Zealand predator-free by 2050!”
The cheeky Kākāriki, a lively parakeet, interjected. “Can we truly reclaim our forests from the claws and jaws of those invaders?” A wise and observant Morepork owl, Ruru blinked his large, round eyes. “Is that so? Quite a lofty goal, but can they really do it?”
Red-crowned Kakariki, Photo credit: CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 Simeon W, Flickr
With its unique biodiversity, New Zealand is home to a huge array of species found nowhere else on Earth. However, many of these treasures face an existential threat from invasive predatory mammals, such as rats, stoats, and possums, introduced by human settlers centuries ago. These voracious predators ravage the native bird populations. Many species are now extinct, and more are now on the brink of extinction.
Predator-Free New Zealand 2050 (PFNZ2050) was initiated in 2016 with an audacious aim of eradicating the most destructive trio of predators: possums, stoats, and rats; from New Zealand. This call for action echoed through the mountains and valleys, inspiring conservationists to make New Zealand, once again, a land of breathtaking beauty and thriving unique biodiversity. The ambitious aim of Predator Free 2050 is not without precedent. To date, New Zealand has successfully eradicated invasive mammals from 105 (admittedly much smaller) islands.
The first step, removing predators with aerial 1080 poisoning and ground-based resetting traps, will help remove the majority of predators. A modified aerial 1080 approach, developed by Zero Invasive Predators (ZIP), can result in localised eradication. This was first tried in a 400-ha area at Mt. Taranaki in 2016, then at a 2,300-ha site in South Westland, using ground-based resetting traps. Regular servicing of resetting traps also gives better ground-based control results.
Once pests have been eradicated from an area, the next big challenge is to defend the area from invasion. ZIP demonstrated how to defend predators from re-invasion in two sites using a “virtual barrier” of traps. A 2 km wide barrier of traps protected a 400-ha peninsula at Bottle Rock in the Marlborough Sounds. Using this virtual barrier of traps, ZIP prevented predators from re-invading at two sites, in the short term.
Australian brushtail possums, initially introduced into New Zealand for the fur trade, and now one of the major pest mammals in New Zealand. Photo credit: CC BY-SA 2.0, Gnu Chris, Flickr
Detecting the survivors is the next crucial phase for eradication, as any survivors can build a new population. The CWMC and Cacophony Project found that thermal cameras are 3.6 times more sensitive than trial cameras in detecting possums. Whilst trail cameras appear to improve detection rates, they do not always trigger when a small, fast-moving animal moves in front of them. These cameras also use infrared illumination at night, which may deter some animals.
Thermal cameras are a new advanced technology that shows high sensitivity in detecting both small and large pest mammals. Because the motion detection is done using software, the sensitivity can easily be adjusted. Unlike trail cameras, thermal cameras do not require infrared illumination to operate at night.
Videos collected by the thermal cameras are classified using AI technology (machine learning) trained on a library with more than 50,000 tagged videos. The AI can identify the animal species and only keep recordings for the target pests, which can be stored on-board the device or sent out using the cellular network.
To achieve the PFNZ 2050 goal, detecting the last few individual pest mammals is complex and expensive. As a technical improvement in detection, ZIP has made an AI network of over 500 cameras across the Predator-free South Westland project area. The AI cameras use LoRa (low-powered radio technology) to send the information to solar-powered mini-satellites. The information is transferred to a web server that checks the information the next day. The AI cameras only need to be serviced twice a year to change the batteries. The AI cameras have reduced the time to detect one predator from around six weeks to just one day and have reduced the cost significantly.
PFNZ2050 will require more innovative strategies, control tools, and wider public support to be successful in its ambitious challenge. Future control work will increasingly take place in and around urban areas. As such, the next most important advancement needs to be construct control tools that community groups can use. There should be a bottom-up-driven approach to community engagement in conservation so that as new technologies become available, the number and size of invasive mammal-free publicly and privately managed reserves can increase. In a recent study, people showed high support for species-specific toxins, but there is a shortage of funding for registration of these toxins.
NZ has a 60-year history of eradicating pest mammals, from tiny 1-ha Maria Island to more than 11,000 ha Campbell Island, with suitable techniques and public support. This is an example of how the impossible becomes possible when passion, science, and community unite.
With a final chorus of their harmonious calls, the native birds took flight, their wings carrying their hopes and aspirations to the corners of the land. From forests to cities, their songs echoed, touching the hearts of all who listened.
This article was prepared by postgraduate student Mohamed Safeer as part of the ECOL 608 Research Methods in Ecology course for his Master of Pest Management degree.
Imagine the Canterbury Plains blanketed in tall trees interwoven with small hardwoods. This beautiful, unique landscape is then singed into dry grassland with the arrival of Māori. Continue to imagine European settlers introduce weedy exotics that infest the landscapes, once again modifying the region. Now, picture the current landscape – a monotonous cover of dairy farms. Which of these images would you think is best for our native and endemic species?
Prior to humans or today? (Think from an insect’s perspective)
The plains have been a dynamic landscape ever since humans stepped foot in our vulnerable country. They will continue to experience dramatic changes in the future with the ever growing population leading to climate change, urban expansion and agriculture intensification.
The 1940s saw the commencement of irrigation on the plains so that farmers could have a reliable water source to enhance the production of pasture and crops. Water facilitated the development of dairying from sheep farming, into the landscape we see today. Between 2002 and 2012, the Canterbury herd increased by 115%, accounting for 13.5% of the Aotearoa dairy herd.
These drastic landscape changes have been detrimental to many of our precious native species by creating unfavourable conditions and habitats, species such as the bellbird (Anthornis melanura) have suffered. Some species, such as paradise shelducks (Tadorna variegata), have exploded in population numbers due to the favorable wet conditions caused from irrigating.
Within the Canterbury Plains, less than 0.5% of this area is still the original remnant forest. Canterbury has been described as the most biological deprived and most modified environment in Aotearoa due to the intensification of agriculture. However, agriculture is a big portion of the country’s economy, bringing in approximately $10.6 billion (5%) of the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
The food and fiber sector are major employer, providing jobs to over 359,000 people. Not only does it feed New Zealanders, it is also a big player in the global food market. in order to come to terms with this environmental dilemma, farms need to incorporate more sustainable agricultural practices, to feed the world and to support biodiversity. Currently through education and awareness this is already becoming a point of discussion.
There has been a push to introduce native vegetation into farming systems. Several studies have examined the impacts of intensive dairy farming on soil health, vegetation, and life below ground. Farmers are now starting to see the benefits of even simple things, such as planting native vegetation. Such plantings not only positively impact farms, but also our are good for our native species, from small bugs to cryptic skinks and chatty birds.
Mike Bowie from Lincoln University, like me, grew up on a family farm, and went on to tertiary education in ecology. This brings a helpful perspective to topics around the interaction of agriculture and ecology. It led Bowie to check out the biodiversity in the Bankside dryland remnant that is surrounded by an intensive dairy farming landscape. The Bankside Scientific Reserve in a 2.6-hectare area established in 1969. Mike wanted to know how adjacent agricultural land impacts the soil composition and fauna in this reserve area.
Aerial photograph of the Bankside Scientific Reserve with kānuka and matagouri dotted throughout. (From Bowie et al., 2015)
In 1970, an initial vegetation survey was conducted by Molloy within the new reserve. Bowie’s survey in 2015 found that only 31% of plants that Molloy surveyed still remained and that 27 new exotic species were present. The fauna found in the remnant were different to that of the neighbouring agricultural land. Bowie discovered the presence of four native earthworm species along with six exotic species. The number of the exotic worm species decreased with distance into the reserve.
Bowie and his fellow researchers found 112 specimens of invertebrates, including many beetles as well as a significant native species, the ground weta! Soil pH, nitrate, and phosphate levels were all lower in the reserve compared to the surrounding paddocks.
These observations highlight the need to retain existing dryland remnants and to establish other reserves throughout the plains. A diverse landscape will support a diverse range of species. I think farmers and the community are now starting to see the value of incorporating native vegetation and agroecological principles into their system, such as mixed species pasture systems.
We don’t all need to put three hectares away into a reserve. Even small steps, such as planting a row of diverse natives along a fence line or waterway, will make a huge difference, if many farms join in.
One thing that is highlighted in this study is the need for continued maintenance of restoration and remnant projects. It is not a plant and leave situation (no pun was intended…). Weed and pest control should be continually applied in these areas to prevent exotic weeds and animals from becoming established and smothering and displacing the natives.
An example of this is in practice Te Ara Kakariki group that is establishing green dots (tiny native areas) from the Southern Alps to Lake Ellesmere/Te Waihora on private properties. This increases the connectivity of native planting, further increasing the power that these small areas can make overall. Animals and invertebrates will be able to spread throughout these dots and over the region.
Farming has transformed the landscape of the Canterbury Plains. Image from Adrian Paterson.
Farmers are becoming more aware of sustainable principles through education from organisations such as Te Ara Kakariki, DairyNZ, Landcare trust, and councils. Through education, ecology is becoming more interwoven into their practices. It will be a trick balancing the need for feeding the world and protecting the environment. Ecology is an excellent way to find this balance in agriculture, it can be adapted to any farming system to suit their needs and desires.
Mike wants to help bridge this gap, not only in this study, but also others that he has conducted throughout his time at Lincoln University. Mike has examined how native plantings encourage native and beneficial invertebrates on Canterbury dairy farms, plus many more. I too believe that ecology and agriculture can work together to create a more sustainable agriculture sector that can efficiently produce food and improve food security, whilst supporting the health of the soil, water and biodiversity.
This article was prepared by Master of Science postgraduate student Sam Fitzgerald as part of her ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.
Invasive species are a major concern for ecosystems worldwide, causing significant disruptions to native flora and fauna. Some mammals can have particularly devastating effects on local ecosystems due to their predatory nature. In the Hawke’s Bay, New Zealand, a recent study titled “Niche Partitioning in a Guild of Invasive Mammalian Predators” sheds light on the dynamics of invasive mammalian predators and their impact on the region’s native biodiversity.
I’ll walk you through the key discoveries and explain why they hold immense importance in our understanding of niche partitioning and its implications for ecosystem management.
Niche partitioning refers to the process by which species with similar ecological requirements coexist within an ecosystem by utilizing different resources or occupying different ecological niches. Niche partitioning reduces direct competition, promoting the coexistence of species that would otherwise struggle to survive in the same habitat.
In Hawke’s Bay, a guild of invasive mammalian predators has established, comprising three key species: stoats(Mustela erminea), ferrets (Mustela furo), and feral cats (Felis catus).
These predators were introduced to New Zealand and have since wreaked havoc on many native bird populations. Recent studies have revealed an intriguing pattern of niche partitioning among these invaders, suggesting a potential balance within the guild.
Camera traps were deployed in three seasons. Credit by Albert Salemgareyev/ACBK
Researchers have observed distinct differences in the dietary preferences and hunting strategies among these invasive predators in Hawke’s Bay. These variations have allowed the species to exploit food, reducing direct competition and encouraging the peaceful coexistence of individuals.
Stoats, being the smallest and most agile of the three predators, specialize in hunting rats, mice, and birds. Their slender bodies and keen sense of hearing enable them to pursue their prey with stealth and precision. Ferrets, on the other hand, are larger and more versatile, adapting to different types of prey or using various hunting techniques. Ferrets tend to target larger prey, such as rabbits and small hares, which they capture using their strength and speed. Feral cats, similar to stoats and ferrets, are solitary hunters, exhibiting a broader dietary range, preying on both small and medium-sized mammals, birds, and reptiles.
While the predators may occasionally target overlapping prey species, they generally exhibit distinct foraging preferences and occupy different microhabitats. Stoats predominantly inhabit forested areas, where their excellent climbing abilities give them an advantage in pursuing prey in trees. Ferrets, with their larger size and ground-based hunting strategies, are often found in open grasslands and shrublands. Feral cats, being highly adaptable, can exploit a range of habitats, from dense forests to human settlements.
The phenomenon of niche partitioning among invasive predators in Hawke’s Bay has important implications for native species conservation. By occupying different ecological niches, these predators help reduce the burden on specific native animals in an indirect manner, allowing them to persist despite the presence of invaders.
Bird species, in particular, have been heavily impacted by the invasion of mammalian predators. Native birds, such as kiwi, weka, and tui, have experienced population declines due to predation. However, the niche partitioning observed among invasive predators offers a glimmer of hope for the survival of some native bird species. For example, stoats target ground-dwelling birds, while ferrets focus on larger prey, like rabbits. This division of labour reduces the overall predation pressure on specific bird species and allows them to maintain a foothold in their respective habitats.
Stoats are tricky to study. They are hard to find in the field and difficult to keep in captivity. Image from Adrian Paterson.
Understanding the dynamics of niche partitioning among invasive mammalian predators can inform targeted conservation strategies. By recognizing the specific resources and habitats favored by each predator species, conservationists can create plans for managing natural areas that utilize the division of habitats to safeguard endangered native animals. Implementing effective trapping and removal programs, focused on the specific predators posing the greatest threat to certain bird species, can help alleviate their population declines.
Habitat restoration initiatives aimed at enhancing native bird habitats, while creating barriers for invasive predators, can further support the survival and recovery of endangered species. For instance, Wellington, Zealandia is a 225-hectare fenced sanctuary dedicated to protecting and restoring native wildlife. The sanctuary is predator-free and provides a safe haven for endangered bird species like the tīeke (saddleback), kākā, and hihi (stitchbird). Zealandia also conducts active predator control outside the sanctuary to create a buffer zone for native birds.
The study on niche partitioning among invasive mammalian predators in Hawke’s Bay offers valuable insights into the complex interactions within ecosystems and the potential consequences of invasive species on native biodiversity. These findings provide a foundation for conservation efforts and ecosystem management strategies aimed at mitigating the negative impacts of invasive predators on native flora and fauna. By understanding the dynamics of invasive species, we can work towards restoring and preserving the delicate balance of ecosystems, ultimately fostering a more sustainable future for our planet.
Removing cats and ferrets from an ecosystem often has unforeseen consequences, as evidenced by the subsequent increase in site use by stoats. Stoats, cunning predators known for their ability to adapt to changing circumstances, have exploited the absence of cats and ferrets to their advantage. In the absence of these competitors, stoats have become more active during the day, closely following diurnal bird activity. This behavioral shift has raised concerns among conservationists, as it highlights the need for predator control measures to account for the specific hunting patterns and preferences of different predators.
Failing to address this issue adequately could lead to a worse outcome for daylight birds, whose vulnerability to stoat predation may increase if their activities are not considered in predator control strategies. Therefore, it is crucial for ongoing conservation efforts to not only focus on removing invasive predators but also to consider the complex interactions among species and the potential cascading effects that may arise.
Life in the soil can be a tricky business for plants and microbes. Nutrients are a limited commodity for some, and competitors may swindle and cheat to gain the upper hand. Strategic partnerships are highly sought after enabling exchange of one commodity for another within elaborate networks.
In a tough economy, well-connected networks promote resilience, sharing of ideas and opportunity to those participating in mutual exchange. However, an efficient network should be an intentional one. Making simple connections is one thing, but choosing the right friends and trade partners is another.
Although it may not appear that obvious on the surface, most land plants are proficient networkers. Below ground, plants form selective partnerships with microorganisms in the soil to access nutrients, water, and protection from pathogens. Those with strong networks are favoured in times of scarcity and change.
Fungal mycelium consisting of thread-like hyphae. Photo by Lex vB at Dutch Wikipedia, (CC0 1.0)
Within soil communities, fungi known as mycorrhizae play a major role in the growth and survival of plants. It is estimated that more than 80% of vascular plants form partnerships with mycorrhizae, an ancient evolutionary network approximately 450 million years old.
Mycorrhizae are of particular importance in the viticultural industry as grapevines are highly reliant on these partnerships for growth and nutrient uptake influencing grape composition, vine health and occurrence of disease. In fact, grapevines form associations with entire communities of mycorrhizae known as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF).
AMF form close associations within the root tissue of plant hosts through specialized tree-like structures called arbuscules. These allow exchange of mineral nutrients from the soil for carbon fixed by the plant host which is transferred through the extensive hyphal network in the soil. These hyphae form interconnected “superhighways” within the soil, linking neighbouring vines and nearby crops transferring nutrients, such as nitrogen, from one host to another.
Arbuscule of Rhizophagus irregularis colonising a plant root. Photo by Hector Montero, Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0)
AMF are highly diverse and have different effects on nutrient uptake and growth on grapevines. Depending on the situation, AMF can have positive, neutral, or negative effects on plant growth and stress resistance. However, under field conditions, plants are selective in the networks they build. These communities perform a diverse range of functions which collectively contribute to plant health and characteristics. Therefore, investing in the right trade partners is crucial.
Until recently, the effects of whole AMF communities on grapevines had been largely unexplored. A research project at Lincoln University lead by Dr. Romy Moukarzel sought to understand how AMF different communities influence nutrient uptake and growth of different grapevine rootstocks.
In other words, who are the trade partners behind the vines and what is the return from these communities?
To answer these questions, AMF communities were recovered from the roots of three different grapevine rootstocks across three different vineyards. Each rootstock was inoculated with its own (“home”) community or communities from other rootstocks (“away”) within three different vineyards. Vine growth, nutrient uptake, and chlorophyll levels were measured to find out if different communities had positive or negative effects on the different rootstocks.
Consistent with previous work, different vineyards and rootstocks had their own unique communities. Growth and nutrient uptake differed depending on the composition of the community and rootstocks responded differently to the same communities. While some species in these communities improved nutrient uptake, others improved growth. In particular, a diverse community with a large representation of AMF of the Glomeraceae family resulted in the greatest increase in grapevine growth.
In one vineyard, home advantage was also evident with “home” communities having greater increase in vine growth compared to “away” communities. Interestingly, when the amount of each AMF inoculum was equalised, home advantage was no longer observed.
By changing the community composition, the positive effects on plant growth were reduced.
New Zealand vineyard. Photo by Jorge Royan (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Moukarzel and colleagues suggested that altering the composition may have resulted in competition between AMF leading to reduced positive effects on the host. AMF are known to compete for host resources, soil nutrients and colonisation sites. As a result, cooperation, and rivalry between AMF within different communities may have major implications for vine productivity.
So, what can grapevines teach us about networking?
Basically, choose your trade partners wisely. Identify friends and adversaries within the network and invest in those relationships with the greatest return.
As proposed by marketing expert, Porter Gale: the so-called ‘new model’ of networking should focus less on ‘handing out as many business cards as possible’ and more on making connections based on how you want to grow. In other words, efficient networking should focus on investing in specific needs and interests. A well connected network with diverse partners offers wide opportunity and stability if components are co-operative.
Overall, the findings generated from the study will be an invaluable insight towards leveraging AMF communities to target specific growth and nutrient requirements of grapevines. This is of particular importance to the viticultural industry as the composition of these communities play an important role in determining vine health, yield, nutrition, grape composition, and wine characteristics.
Featured image: vineyard inter-row by rawpixel.com (CC0 1.0)
While this study has provided a step towards understanding the communities below the vines, soil is a complex system with a wide range of players and there is much to learn about the orchestration of these networks. There are likely many more tricks of the underground trade to uncover.
Moukarzel, R., Ridgway, H. J., Waller, L., Guerin-Laguette, A., Cripps-Guazzone, N., & Jones, E. E. (2022). Soil Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Communities Differentially Affect Growth and Nutrient Uptake by Grapevine Rootstocks. Microbial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-022-02160-z
This article was prepared by a Master of Science postgraduate student Malina Hargreaves as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.
Let’s say you want to know what animal species are present in a forest. You could walk along line transects and record the species visually observed. You could set up trail cameras to take pictures of passing animals for as long as there is enough space in the memory card and battery life in the cameras. You can use the acoustic survey method to study bats, birds, frogs, and even some monkey species, as they can be distinguished based on their sounds and calls.
Depending on the size of your study area, making a list of the animal species present might take a several hours to several months because you will need to carry out various methods to identify them, which may also require species experts.
These are well-established conventional methods for biodiversity monitoring, but is there no single method to find all the species in a given area at once? A one-size-fits-all t-shirt?
There is a rapidly developing method that can identify a good portion of species in a given study area, including those living on the ground, in the ground, in the water, and even those flying in the air.
Every organism contains genetic material called deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), passed down from parents to children. All organisms from the same species have very similar DNA.
This technology takes advantage of the traces that organisms leave of their DNA in their environment, whether feathers, skin, scales, urine, or faeces. These traces, known as environmental DNA (eDNA), can be found in soil, water, and air.
This shiny new method is called DNA metabarcoding. Simply put, it identifies organisms by matching their DNA with reference DNA from the gene database or library. It is like matching the barcode of products when you check out at the supermarket.
The process begins with collecting water or soil, or even air, samples from the study area. These samples typically contain genetic material from diverse organisms, including bacteria, plants, and animals.
Once samples are collected from the field, they are brought to the laboratory. DNA is separated from the samples, amplified, and sequenced to generate vast amounts of genetic data that can be compared with existing DNA databases and reference libraries such as GenBank for species identification.
DNA metabarcoding can detect a broad range of organisms at once, providing a snapshot of the species diversity within the study area. That way, you can avoid performing various sampling methods. How convenient is that!
Of course, no method is perfect, even DNA metabarcoding. Since it is still developing, there are limitations. The public gene library has the DNA references of many species but this is still a small fraction of all the species on earth, so far. There can be contamination in the samples, which could disrupt the results. Errors can occur not only during sample collection in the field but also in the laboratory.
Compared to DNA metabarcoding, conventional methods have stronger standardised techniques for sampling and for interpreting the datasets. Besides, in the context of biodiversity monitoring, conventional methods can provide detailed information, such as abundance, age, sex ratios, and individual animals’ special characteristics, such as colours and conditions, which DNA metabarcoding cannot tell us.
Conventional methods are like pictures with tiny pixels portraying good resolution, but their taxonomic scope is limited, whereas those of DNA metabarcoding cover a broad range of species, but the resolution is coarse.
Is there the best of both worlds?
Yes! Robert Holdaway and colleagues, including Ian Dickie working at Lincoln University, suggested that combining DNA metabarcoding with conventional monitoring methods will benefit scientists in many ways.
Using them together will enable scientists to test and improve the reliability and accuracy of our still-developing DNA metabarcoding method. Moreover, combining them will result in a higher chance of detecting species from the same lineage.
Robert and colleagues provided three case studies in New Zealand that can benefit from the dynamic duo.
First, the duo can be of advantage to the nationwide measurements of New Zealand’s biodiversity. They can provide greater taxonomic coverage and more thorough information on the relations among biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and services.
Second, integrating DNA metabarcoding with Māori biodiversity monitoring approaches will bring more understanding to the Māori worldview of interconnections among living and non-living beings. Metabarcoding can enhance biodiversity inventories, identifying species important and relevant to Māori which are rare or hard to find using conventional methods.
Third, combining DNA metabarcoding with traditional surveillance in detecting pest species at the early stage will secure native species and landscapes from harmful biosecurity threats, such as harmful pests and diseases.
In addition, DNA results shared from various surveys using the dynamic duo will be added to the reference libraries making them more resourceful and convenient for future research. Having more reference DNA sequences of species in the reference libraries, like GenBank, will make biodiversity monitoring much easier by identifying species with just a few clicks.
DNA metabarcoding is a rapidly developing and powerful tool for monitoring biodiversity. Integrating it into conventional methods will lead to a stronger method to get plausible results. Overall, as Robert and colleagues indicated, not only will they add value to New Zealand’s biodiversity and Māori culture, but they will also protect the native natural environment and species through early detection of pests.
This article was prepared by Master of Science postgraduate student Zin Mar Hein as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.
Together, they will indeed make the best of both worlds for conservation.
“Yes, why not!! Hi! I am Boysenberry. I will tell you the whole story, how I fight this destructive fungus.Before delving into the subject, I just want to tell you a little bit more about me.”
Boysenberries Photo by simplyAutumn 2009 from Flickr
I am a rich source of micronutrients and have great health benefits. My origin was in California, USA and I was introduced to New Zealand in the early 1940s. New Zealand has become a major producer and exporter of my fruits. The fruits are produced on the second-year canes ‘floricanes‘, whereas the first-year canes that only possess leaves known as ‘primocanes’. Those that grow quickly are known as ‘hurricanes’. Hah – an old joke amongst us boysenberries.
Propagation of my plants is done either by cutting or tissue culture. Sadly, there is a fungus, Peronospora sparsa, who is my enemy and develops a disease, known as Downy mildew, systemically in tissue cultured plants. It causes huge damage and is will often cause losses of 50%, when I am grown with conventional management methods, to 100 %, when grown organically. It produces symptoms of mycelial growth of fungus, on my leaves in early spring and then later then premature reddening, shriveling, and hardening of my fruits and ultimately, the leaves become dull. That’s why it is sometimes called “Dry berry“.
Downy Mildew of Boysenberry by Jones and other researchers
“Unfortunately! I was struggling with this disease when some traditional methods, like removal of leaf litter, rooted ends of primocanes, and root suckers besides the fungicide sprays, that were being used to fight against it, but those were unfortunately not enough to beat it.I know, you are thinking, then how do I overcome this disease?”
Some scientists from Lincoln University; Anusara Herath Mudiyanselage, Hayley Ridgway, Monika Walter, Marlene Jaspers, and Eirian Jones, came up with some solutions and experimented on me. They thought that heat and fungicides could help treat and stop the growth of the disease.
To test if these ideas could work, fifteen symptomatic plants (2-year-old) were selected, repotted and cold stored at freezing temperature for 6 weeks to induce dormancy in them. Dormancy is a state where my plants hang tough and save their energy without undergoing their active growth. Dormancy allows my plants survive on their reserved food as they are cut off from the supply of food. The plants were transferred to a greenhouse until 2-3 primocanes developed. Thereafter, the plants were divided into three groups with five plants in each and given three different treatments to each group.
The first group remained in the greenhouse for a month and was then given a heat treatment by being placed in a growth chamber at 34°C for 4 more weeks. The second group was sprayed twice with phosphoric acid and mancozeb (fungicide), the first spray was given two weeks afterward in greenhouse and second was given two weeks after the first spray. Plus, this group was also heat treated for a month. But the last group was left untreated and remained in the greenhouse for two months.
Well! The main reason for giving the heat treatment with or without fungicide spray was to check the ability of my propagation material to limit the systemic infection of fungus prior to tissue culture to produce fungus free plants with verification done by PCR.
Tissue Culture grown plants. Photo by EcoFert Inc. 2010 from Flickr
After each of the treatments were complete, the plants were ready for the next step: propagation.
“Do you remember how I am propagated? Yes, the tissue culture.“ The single-bud stem cuttings from each plant were washed in antimicrobial soap, followed by surface sterilisation and washing in distilled water. These steps were followed in order to make my cuttings free from any contamination and washed with water to remove excessive chemicals/disinfectants. The cuttings were then placed in a liquid medium that made it possible for them to grow and multiply in a sterile condition.
“You know what!” 125 plants survived in total and were potted after this. The largest group of survivors were from the heat treatment group.
Cuttings/plants with roots were placed in the greenhouse for a couple of weeks where they were misted to maintain moisture. Afterwards they were shifted to the shade house and were kept for about five months under conditions that favor systemic symptoms. As the cool and wet conditions induce the growth of fungus, these conditions were provided to check the ability of my plants to resist it after given treatments.
“Are you curious, to know what happened next, then?“
Polymerase chain reaction machine Photo by USAID Laos 2020 from Flickr
Twenty-two weeks after potting, all the untreated plants become sick with the disease. However, the other two treatments gave phenomenal results. Only 13 % and 17 % of plants showed visible symptoms, treated with heat only and fungicide + heat, respectively. The seventy-six plants (of 125) from both treatments (Heat and Fungicide + Heat) survived well without any symptoms several weeks after potting.
Because some plants could have the fungus but not show any signs of infection, the researchers used the modern molecular technique (PCR) to confirm that there were no asymptomatic plants. This test was carried out regularly at certain interval for about a year and all of the tests gave a negative result. Fortunately, only a few plants with heat and fungicide + heat treatments got infected as compared to 100 % infection in untreated ones.
“Well! this was my story, and now I can say that I can fight against this destructive disease, if I am given heat treatment with or without fungicide.I think you are also curious to know how the heat treatment affect the fungus.“
The answer is the high temperature. The higher temperature destroys the essential chemical activities and inactivates micro-organisms like viruses. Similarly, this fungus has the nature of only being rely upon the living matter to eat and survive like the viruses. Therefore, the high temperature restricts the growth of fungus into the shoot tips and stops the infection.
This is the first time that researchers have found a solution to a key challenge in managing dry berry disease. This opens the door to disease free propagation of my plants in nurseries with the uptake of heat treatment and without fear of fungicide resistance to fungi.
“So now we can all be happicanes!”
This article was prepared by Master of Science postgraduate student Manjot Kaur as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.
Reference: Herath Mudiyanselage AM, Ridgway HJ, Walter M, Jaspers MV, Jones E. 2019. Heat and fungicide treatments reduce Peronospora sparsa systemic infection in boysenberry tissue culture. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 153: 651–656.
.jpg){kind=link}
