Category: entomology

  • Wasp colony personalities: aggressiveness matters

    Wasp colony personalities: aggressiveness matters

    Home is where the heart is! And for social wasps, such as Vespula, home is everything.

    Social wasps work together well in a group. Each wasp has a role, and together they act almost like a single living organism. While weather, food, and other environmental conditions, such as human disturbance, can affect how wasps behave, researchers wanted to know something different: can entire wasp colonies have their own personalities?

    This question was explored by a team led by J.M. Jandt, from the University of Otago, and Mateus Detoni, then a PhD student at Otago and now a lecturer at Lincoln University. Their study was published in the scientific journal Insectes Sociaux.

    Why study these wasps?

    Vespula wasps are well known for defending their nests aggressively when they feel threatened. However, we still know relatively little about why some colonies seem more aggressive than others. The researchers wanted to find out whether different colonies consistently behaved differently, just as people can have different personalities. Importantly, wasps are recognised as pests and have major ecological and economic impacts in New Zealand. Understanding aggression will help us to manage wasps better.

    What did the researchers do?

    The study was carried out in three different locations in New Zealand’s South Island, observing three main behaviours. They recorded how wasps actively foraged for food, how aggressive the colony was when not disturbed, and how aggressive the nest became when disturbed. These assessments were measured over three periods: one day, one week, and over a month. Mateus and colleagues also recorded other information, such as nest size, weather when the colony was breeding, and temperature around the nest.

    Copyright 2026 Tom Bentley. Vespula germanica adult male walker wasp.

    What did they discover?

    Some colonies were consistently more aggressive than others, no matter when they were tested or how the tests were carried out. In other words, colonies appeared to have their own behavioural “personalities”

    Some colonies were naturally more defensive and aggressive, while others were calmer. Differences in aggression could not be explained by factors such as nest size or temperature. Other factors, such as genetics or colony development, may play an important role.

    Why is this important?

    The study shows that wasp colonies are not all the same. Just like people and other animals, groups of insects can behave differently from one another. In this case, a colony in which the individual wasps are genetically similar to one another, whole colonies can share the aggression. This is of importance to New Zealand because more aggressive colonies may compete with native wasp species, a threat to other insects and birds and pose a greater risk for people who accidentally disturb their nests.

    How can this help control wasps?

    Pest control methods assume that all pest targets in a population will behave the same. However, this study suggests that some wasp colonies are naturally more aggressive than others. If these colonies can be identified easily, then control efforts will be made easier, targeting the highest risks nest first, making management programs more effective.

    Colony nest of Vespula germanica.

    What has happened since the study?

    Research into social wasps has continued. Scientists are now investigating how genetic differences within colonies affect behaviours such as aggression, foraging and the ability to survive environmental challenges.

    The bigger picture

    It is known that individual animals can have consistent personality traits. This study has expanded the idea by showing that the entire wasp colonies may also have stable behavioural characteristics. Some researchers describe social insect colonies as “superorganisms” because thousands of individuals work together so closely that the colony behaves as a single living thing. From this perspective, a colony’s level of aggression can be viewed as a trait that evolves just like traits in individual animals.

    Questions for future research

    The study raises several new questions relating to what causes colonies to stay highly aggressive, and when is aggression helpful or harmful to a colony. Do other social insects, such as ants and bees, show similar colony personalities? This opens doors for further work.

    All is all

    The research by Jandt, Detoni, and colleagues showed that wasp colonies do not all behave the same way. Instead, each colony can have its own consistent pattern of behaviour, much like a personality. This discovery has changed how scientists think about social insects and may help improve future management strategies of this social wasp.

    As science continues to study these remarkable insects, one message is becoming clear: Understanding the personality of a colony may be just as important as understanding the behaviour of individual wasps.

    This article was prepared by Master’s of Bioprotection student, Richard Dikrey, as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

    Jandt, J. M., Detoni, M., Loope, K. J., & Santoro, D. (2020). Vespula wasps show consistent differences in colony-level aggression over time and across contexts. Insectes sociaux, 67(3), 367-381.

  • The odd-shaped claw… is alone no more

    The odd-shaped claw… is alone no more

    I think most of us at some point in our lives experience loneliness. Even we as a species are alone, having separated from our closest relatives, chimps, several million years ago. We are also alone in our genus with the last of our Homo siblings species having gone extinct roughly 10 – 40 thousand years ago. Now, there is only us, Homo sapiens.

    For the Gradungulidae family of New Zealand’s spiders shared the same story until recently.

    Gradungulidae, the large clawed or odd-clawed spiders, is a family of spiders endemic to New Zealand and Australia. Gradungulids are identified by their asymmetrically large claws on the 1st and 2nd legs that they use to capture prey(giving rise to their ‘odd-clawed’ name).

    Until recently there were only three species of Gradungulidae found in New Zealand; Gradungula sorenseni, Pianoa isolata, and Spelungula cavernicola.

    Granungula sorenseni, Forster, 1955. Photo: Sebastian Doak.
    Photo taken 18 August 2021, sourced from Wikimedia Commons. Cc-by-4.0 license.
    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gradungula_sorenseni_-_Sebastian_Doak_-_151718791.jpeg

    Gradungula sorenseni has the widest distribution across NZ, in forests stretching from Nelson and Marlborough in the north, to western Southland and across the Foveaux Strait into Stewart Island in the south.

    Pianoa isolata is found only within the native beech (Nothofagaceae) forest of Waikaia Forest in central north Southland, where it gets its common name Piano Flat spider, named for a series of flats along the Waikaia River.

    Piano Flat spider, Pianoa isolata, Forster, 1987. Photo: Steve Kerr.
    Photo taken 11 February 2014, sourced from Wikimedia Commons. Cc-by-4.0 license.
    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Piano-flat-spider-steve-kerr-cc-by-01.jpg

    Spelungula cavernicola, has a more limited distribution, and is one of only two legally protected spiders, the other being the Katipo spider (Latrodectus katipo). Spelungula cavernicola is found, as its name implies, primarily in caverns or cave systems. It is present in the Oparara cave system north of Karamea on the upper west coast of the South Island, caves along the Heaphy River, and in the Motupipi cave region of Golden Bay.

    One of New Zealand’s two legally protected spiders, the Nelson Cave Spider, Spelungula cavernicola, Forster, 1987. Photo: Mark Anderson.
    Photo taken 15 July 2017, sourced from Wikimedia Commons. Cc-by-4.0 license.
    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:P1150023-001.jpg

    All of these species of New Zealand’s Gradungulids were described by New Zealand’s most accomplished arachnologist, Dr Ray Forster. While describing these species Dr Forster suspected that the actual diversity of the Gradungulids was much greater but he could not gather sufficient samples to captures this within his lifetime.

    This extra diversity has continued amongst New Zealand’s subsequent arachnologists. Over the last 20 years Gradungulids specimens have been diligently collected across their distributions to fill this gap within Grandungulid taxonomy (including The following people collected specimens over 20 years: Peter Michalik , Cor Vink , Martin Ramírez , Danilo Harms and Stephen Pawson).

    In 2015 a photo was uploaded by Andy MacDonald to iNaturalist of an unidentified species of Pianoa found in Mount Richmond Forest Park, Marlborough. This site is 600 km away from the known population of Pianoa isolata in Waikaia Forest! This find led to the discovery of another population of a different Pianoa species near Rarangi, Marlborough by Patrick Miller. Both of these discoveries were made by amateur naturalists, making this an amazing win for citizen science!

    .

    Unidentified Pianoa sp. (sp. means an unidentified species in the Pianoa genus) in Mount Richmond Forest Park. Photo: Andy MacDonald.
    Photo taken 17 October 2015, sourced from INaturalist. Creative Commons copyright. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/2148126

    All of this research and specimen collection over the last 20 years has resulted in the discovery of two new species of Gradungulidae, with there likely being more!

    Specimens from Spelungula, Pianoa, and Gradungula were analysed using both DNA and traditional taxonomic methods and confirmed that there was enough difference in populations of Pianoa, and Gradungula to constitute different species!

    These two new species have been named Gradungula kahurangi sp. nov. (sp. nov. means new species) and Pianoa civis sp. nov. There are also likely to be another species of Pianoa and another two species of Gradungula, but these were unable to be confirmed due to a lack of adult specimens (where species differences are most obvious).

    The populations of Spelungula cavernicola found in the Oparara and Takaka cave systems were not found to be different enough to be two separate species, despite these two cave systems not being connected and roughly 70 km apart!

    This suggests that historically, and even currently, there may be travel of Spelungula cavernicola between cave systems, likely using the isolated caves of the Heaphy Valley. This is a rather impressive feat for a cave spider!

    This lines up with present research on Spelungula cavernicola being troglophiles (species that can live both in cave, but also on the surface) rather than troglobites (species that live exclusively in the permanent darkness of underground habitats, such as caves).

    Pianoa isolata, and Gradungula sorenseni now have new siblings, likely with more on the way! However, Spelungula cavernicola is still alone, an impressive testament to their ability to travel outside their cave systems which they depend on!

    Diversity of New Zealand Gradungulids appears to be concentrated in the northern part of the South Island. Research is ongoing, with potentially three more species to be described. Citizen science has played a crucial part in the discovery of these new species! So, get out there and get involved.

    Who knows there may be a new species out there waiting for you to find it!

    This blog was created by BSc (honours) student Max Singers as part of an assignment for ECOL608 and was based on the 2025 paper “Alone no more—Integrative taxonomy of New Zealand odd‐clawed spiders challenges the monotypy of Pianoa and Gradungula ( Araneae: Gradungulidae )” published in Systematic Ecology.

  • New beetle reveals New Zealand origin story

    New beetle reveals New Zealand origin story

    Beginning the journey

    Just before Christmas in 1999, Dr. Eric Scott collected an unusual ground beetle from the Wangapeka Track, in Kahurangi National Park. His wife also suffered a broken arm after a bad fall along the track and Eric safely supported her through the tough walk out for medical care. You will also be pleased to know that the beetle specimen was safely delivered to the Entomology Research Museum at Lincoln University. All in a day’s work for an entomologist!

    At that time, no one knew that this tiny beetle would become crucial evidence in a controversial biogeographical debate years later.

    Classification work

    The scientific name of this newly discovered ground beetle species was Orthoglymma wangapeka (there is no common name). This species belongs to the ground beetle family (Carabidae, Coleoptera). It is quite small, with a body length about the size of a fingernail. The beetle is elongated and narrowed at the ‘neck’ position. Its entire body is covered in a dark brown, polished exoskeleton.

    It looks like a normal brown beetle at first glance. However, careful examination of both its external structure and internal reproductive organs, led an international research team, including John Marris and Rowan Emberson from Lincoln University, to discover that this was a new species, different from any other known Orthoglymma species.

    Dorsal View of Orthoglymma wangapeka, Scale bar: 1 mm.
    Photo Citation: Lincoln University Living Heritage: Tikaka Tuku Iho (6th Mar 2023). Coleoptera Orthoglymma wangapeka Holotype. In Website Lincoln University Living Heritage: Tikaka Tuku Iho. Retrieved 17th Apr 2026 12:00, from https://livingheritage.lincoln.ac.nz/nodes/view/36272, used under CC BY 3.0 NZ

    The research team placed the newly named Orthoglymma (from Ancient Greek for straight carved lines – referring to the lined on the abdomen) wangapeka (from the locality of collection) in a tribe called Broscini.

    They obtained data on 73 physical traits and compared with closely related beetles. The closest relatives of this species are all found only in New Zealand, Australia, and southern South America. This suggests that the ancestor of these Orthoglymma species was found in these areas. Fossil evidence of Broscini ground beetles in other research suggests that this group originated before the Gondwana breakup.

    Ancient biota debate

    What is the Gondwana breakup? Based on earth science research, Gondwana was a supercontinent that formed around 600 million years ago. It included many of the current continents, such as South America, Africa, Antarctica, Australia, and our homeland, New Zealand. The supercontinent Gondwana began to break apart around 180 million years ago.

    The continent of Zealandia started separating from Gondwana about 85 million years ago, becoming isolated around 70 million years ago, leading to the formation of the Tasman Sea.

    The long process of the fragmentation is known as the Gondwana breakup. This history explains why New Zealand’s biology shares high similarities with other southern landmasses, like Australia, South America, and Southern Africa, which were also part of the original landmass and neighbours to New Zealand.

    A map of the supercontinent Gondwana. At this stage in the earth’s history, Zealandia had not formed a distinct continent yet.
    Photo Citation: Mikocheung, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

    A second critical event occurred in New Zealand after the Gondwana breakup. New Zealand experienced a significant rise in sea level due to the sinking of the Zealandia continent around 25 million years ago. This is known as the ‘Oligocene Drowning’ theory.

    There has been a heated debate about the extent of this drowning in the academic world. Some experts argue that New Zealand was completely submerged under the ocean during the Oligocene Drowning, which would cause all local terrestrial organisms to go extinct. From this perspective, our current animals and plants would have had to colonise New Zealand by crossing the sea after the drowning. On the other hand, the opposing experts claim that parts of New Zealand must have remained above the ocean, providing a refuge for ancient species to survive.

    Beetles and land

    Orthoglymma wangapeka is a tiny ground beetle that belongs to an ancient branch that evolved before the Gondwana breakup began. These beetles are flightless, lacking the obvious ability to disperse long distances across oceans. Their ancestors almost certainly were present in the pre-break up New Zealand region of the supercontinent Gondwana. Their presence is a powerful piece of evidence suggesting that New Zealand was not completely submerged in the ocean during the Oligocene Drowning.

    The area where Orthoglymma wangapeka was collected belongs to the Buller Terrane, which is one of the oldest rock formations in New Zealand and originated on the eastern margin of Gondwana. The species may be a Gondwanan relict, a survivor of extreme environmental change in this area.

    Other ‘living fossil’ are also found in this area suggesting that the Nelson area might have been an island that provided insects, including ground beetles, wētā, and micropterigid moths, with dry land to avoid extinction during the Oligocene Drowning.

    View of Wangapeka Track, where Orthoglymma wangapeka was collected.
    Photo Citation: Michal Klajban, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

    Summary

    As an ecology student, I am deeply drawn to this story because it is remarkable that a newly discovered species could play a vital role in a long-standing unsolved debate in earth science.

    It fascinates me how a tiny organism can carry such a wealth of information about our country’s ancient past. This case demonstrates how biodiversity research connects with other subjects and provides a priceless value in broadening knowledge and highlights the importance of environmental conservation.

    Without conservation of the habitat, this new species could have gone extinct before it was collected, and we would have missed a critical piece to the puzzle to understand the ancient geographical secrets of our country.

    Next time you walk a trail in New Zealand (first watch where you are walking – don’t break and arm!), keep in mind that everything that exists in the environment might carry some undiscovered secrets of the earth’s history, even a tiny ground beetle.

    This article was prepared by Master’s of Bioprotection student, Ethan Harland, as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

    References

    Liebherr, J. K., Marris, J. W. M., Emberson, R. M., Syrett, P., & ROIG‐JUÑENT, S. (2011). Orthoglymma wangapeka gen.n., sp.n. (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Broscini): a newly discovered relict from the Buller Terrane, north‐western South Island, New Zealand, corroborates a general pattern of Gondwanan endemism. Systematic Entomology, 36, 395-414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2011.00569.x

    Matt McGlone, Evolution of plants and animals, Te Ara – the Encyclopedia of New Zealand, https://teara.govt.nz/en/evolution-of-plants-and-animals (accessed 23 April 2026). Story by Matt McGlone, published 1 March 2009.

    Mildenhall, D. C., Mortimer, N., Bassett, K. N., & Kennedy, E. M. (2014). Oligocene paleogeography of New Zealand: maximum marine transgression. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 57(2), 107-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.2014.904387

  • Wasps aren’t all aggressive, just misunderstood

    Wasps aren’t all aggressive, just misunderstood

    Uncategorized, behaviour, conservation, entomology, student blog, wildlife management

    If you had asked me four years ago where I would be today, I would not have said ‘planning to study wasps’, and I would NOT have said ‘New Zealand’! But here I am and that’s what I’m doing.

    My interest in this field originates from my research on ants, and more specifically their unique behaviour. Ants belong to the order Hymenoptera, the same order as bees and wasps.

    Just like humans, wasps can be social creatures, and just like humans they display different levels of aggression (although most types of wasps are not social). Despite there being around 100,000 described wasp species, only around 1,000 of them are social. Which seems crazy, because when you see one wasp, you always seem to see more.

    Vespula wasps are what’s called eusocial, this means that they are organised into groups and all work together under a single queen. Eusociality is impressively efficient. E.O Wilson, a famed ant biologist, once said that humans display a weak form of eusociality, and I have to say I agree with him.

    Now, back to how wasps display different levels of aggression. Have you ever noticed that when you walk past a nest or sit near a wasp sometimes you will be harassed while other times they will completely ignore you? That’s because different colonies of wasps display their own levels of aggression!

    Vespula germanica, David Nicholls, Ratby garden, 22 April 2016

    There are many reasons why wasps may vary in aggression. Some may be more aggressive to drive away predators or outcompete other colonies. Others may be more passive to hide from mammals who could destroy their nests.

    A group of brave researchers, including Mateus Detoni from Lincoln University, put themselves in harm’s way to determine what factors cause wasps to display varying levels of aggression.

    One hypothesis that they developed was that foraging and temperature could increase aggression because that is when wasps are the most active. The methods used for testing the aggression of the wasps included a target made from two black plastic plates that had been clasped together and a black cloth. Inside the plates was an omnidirectional microphone that had been connected to a camera.

    As you may know, wasps are a super invasive pest species in New Zealand. Since the early 1900s they have been having a devastating impact on the beech forests and the native ecosystem as a whole. There are two species in New Zealand Vespula vulgaris and Vespula germanica, both having colonised from Europe in the 20th Century.

    To survive, wasps need sugars and protein, so they go hunting. The main thing wasps are foraging for, especially in beech forests, is honeydew. This is a type of sugar that has been pooped out by scale insects, which live on and inside beech trees. The main source of protein for wasps is, well, anything that is soft enough for them to bring back to their nest.

    Wasp foraging for honey dew on a southern beech tree. Image from Adrian Paterson.

    The study found that, surprisingly, neither foraging activity nor temperature seemed to have any role in indicating whether a colony would be particularly more aggressive than another. So, the researchers turned to the next question, could it have something to do with nest and colony size? Unfortunately, this lead was also a bust. Yes, the larger colony size did allow for higher foraging activity but there was still no indication that a larger nest and colony would increase aggression.

    Did aggression have something to do with the age of wasps? Eusocial insect colonies span generations of individuals meaning there are both juvenile and mature workers alive simultaneously. This was a topic that Mateus had previously studied. Age can play a role in aggression, as the older wasps have more experience defending the nest, which can cause them to have a more aggressive response when agitated.

    Vespula wasp colonies were observed through their life, and it was concluded that the behaviour on a colony level is consistent throughout development. However, one key thing was noted “behaviour can change as an individual, or colony develops” and “consistent differences within a population can still be observed”.

    Aggressiveness could depend on the ratio of aggressive to nonaggressive individuals in the colony. Wasps having their own individual personalities is not something that most people consider, as they are often thought of as all being worker drones. But I guess a lot of that can be attributed to the media shaping how we view wasps, bees, and ants.

    In Europe, wasps have predators that both keep the population in check and give them a reason to be aggressive. The researchers suggested that external pressures may cause certain behaviour to be passed down through generations. In a place where they do not have predators, such as New Zealand, they can learn to pass on behaviour that is less aggressive.

    Wasps are insects that have individual personalities influencing the aggression levels of the colonies that they live in. Eusociality truly is one of the most interesting concepts in the animal kingdom.

                    This article was prepared by Postgraduate Diploma in Applied Science student Jack Gregorian as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

    Reference:

    Jandt, J. M., Detoni, M., Loope, K. J., & Santoro, D. (2020). Vespula wasps show consistent differences in colony-level aggression over time and across contexts. Insectes Sociaux, 67(3), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-020-00768-3

  • The munchy mountain mystery of the lost bark beetle!

    The munchy mountain mystery of the lost bark beetle!

    Have you ever bitten into a slice of bread, only to find out that it’s gone mouldy? Yuck! But what causes mould, and how does it spread? This was a mystery solved by scientists in the 1800s.

    Fungal branches. CC BY-SA 4.0 Rafał Szczerski

    Mould in bread is caused by a fungus (fungi for multiple). Fungi are made of many tiny branches that grow into a huge maze. These branches reach out to find food from the environment around them; the branches spread from a central point to search for food at the edges. As resources run low, the middle of the fungus dies, creating an expanding ring of live branches. There are many types of fungi out there, and mould is one type that we try to avoid when we store our fruit, vegetables, and bread. When scientists discovered fungi, they solved one mystery, but there are new questions to be answered.

    One mystery involves a type of insect that loves to eat fungi: beetles! Specifically, beetles in the group called Brontini. These little guys eat fungi when they are larvae (baby beetles before they’ve become adults). Usually, the these larvae eat fungi under the bark of trees, but recently a special Brontini beetle was found. This beetle, called Protodendrophagus antipodes by scientists, lives up in the mountains of New Zealand, above the treeline in the alpine zone. Protodendrophagus antipodes is a long name, so we’ll call them Anti.

    Anti (Protodendrophagus antipodes) larva. Photo credit: John Marris.

    Anti are special for more than one reason. First, they live way up in the cold alpine area, which is a harsh environment to live in. The freezing temperatures and dry environment even stop trees from growing there! Second, every other species of Brontini beetle feeds on fungi under tree bark. Confusingly, the area where Anti lives doesn’t have these fungi. Since it’s too high up the mountain for trees to grow, there’s no fungi under tree bark for the beetles to munch on. And so, one group of enthusiastic scientists decided to figure out what these little guys eat. Let’s meet our investigators!

    Our team is made up of three skilled diet detectives: John Marris (“The Mastermind”) – the strategic leader who knows the ins and outs of beetles; David Hawke (“The Brains”) – a science whiz with a flair for chemistry; and David Glenny (“The Sidekick”) – your friendly neighbourhood plant expert. Together, the team solved the mini mystery in the mountains: where is the food for Anti?

    Lichen on rock. CC BY 4.0 Caleb Catto

    In 2018, the team went into the Southern Alps on an exciting trip to examine the scene and gather more evidence. They found two very important clues. First, there were lots of lichens in the areas where the beetles live. Second, sometimes the beetles lived where there wasn’t anything else to eat. I bet you can guess what our prime menu suspect is!

    You’ve probably seen lichens around, though you may not have known what they were. Lichens grow on trees and rocks, but they’re not just one species; lichens are an example of a “symbiotic relationship”. This is when two organisms work together to boost each other’s chance of survival. In this case, the organisms work so closely together that the lichen itself is actually made up of both species! The body of the lichen is a strong skeleton built from fungus. Inside that skeleton live algae, plant-like organisms that can use the sun to make food. In this way, the fungus keeps the algae safe, and the algae feed the fungus. Win win! Cha-ching!

    Spores from a fungus. CC BY 4.0 Aurora Storlazzi

    Since lichens are made up of fungi, this seemed like a pretty good place for our detectives to start. Every good private eye needs evidence to make their case. Thankfully, our clever detectives saw a way to test their theory: the stomach contents of the beetles! They collected some Anti as “evidence” and looked at the food in their stomachs. Inside they found spores that came from a lichen fungus.

    “What is a spore?” you may ask. Remember that maze of branches that make up a fungus? Well, sometimes the branches can’t find enough food for the fungus to eat. If that happens, the fungus has a new strategy to survive: spores! These are little circular pieces of fungus that can spread to new areas and find the fungus a better home.

    CC BY 4.0 Luis Prado

    But their work wasn’t done yet: the detectives found more than just lichen spores in their beetle stomachs. They also found a whole bunch of mystery food which they couldn’t identify. The scientists needed to confirm that lichens really are the only food eaten by Anti. So, the scientists put their thinking hats on and decided to find a new way to solve this puzzle. They chose to use an approach called the “stable isotope test”.

    An isotope is a special form of elements, such as nitrogen and carbon, and organisms at the bottom of the food chain absorb them from the environment. If an animal eats something, then the isotopes of the animal should be pretty similar to its food.To solve this mystery, the scientists tested the isotopes of Anti and all of the potential foods in the area. A good detective looks at all the possible solutions, so they tested the soil, the mosses, the lichens, the tiny mountain plants, and even a type of spider.

    At last, the detective work was done. Their test showed just what we’re all thinking: the Anti beetle really does eat lichen. The link was so clear that David Hawke called it a “textbook example” of the test in action. The scientists were very excited because lichen-eating is pretty rare for beetles.

    After all their investigation, the detectives could finally declare: “case closed!” Now we have a new mystery: how do these beetles survive in the extreme cold of the alpine zone?

    This article was prepared by Master of Science student Heidi Allan as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

  • To bait, or not to bait…: wētā foraging and brodifacoum

    To bait, or not to bait…: wētā foraging and brodifacoum

    I am lucky that my parents live right down the road from the Brook Waimārama Sanctuary. This 690 hectare fenced sanctuary is home to many native species and is about to be home to 40 spotted kiwis (Exciting!!!!). Within this Sanctuary there are “wētā hotels” that offers a haven for wētā, although I have also seen a giant leopard slug in there as well. I often visit the Sanctuary, it has a lot of history and diversity. Sanctuaries offer a safe space for vulnerable native species away from large predators. The surrounding predator-proof fence keeps the bad things out and the good things in. Unfortunately, the rest of New Zealand isn’t exactly pest free, with a lot of our native species being hunted down every day by introduced pests.

    Predator Free 2050 is an exciting goal that is only 25 years away. With our unique flora and fauna, why wouldn’t we want our beautiful country to be predator free? Predator Free 2050 has a focus on removing several pest species (rats, mustelids and possums). Pest Free Banks Peninsula (PFBP) is a local project focused on protecting our beautiful coast, islands and land within Banks Peninsula. PFBP has several methods and tools to eradicate and monitor pests. A common toxin used by PFBP is brodifacoum.

    File:Female tree weta on tree fern.jpg
    A Tree Weta (Image from Avenue , 2010, CC BY S.A 3.0)

    There are concerns about whether toxins, specifically brodifacoum, is killing our native species. These tasty but deadly treats are targeted at mammalian pests, but native invertebrates have also been munching away at the cereal baits that contain the toxin when they come across it. Brodifacoum-laced baits became a popular pest control toxin in the 1990s.

    Quail Island is an island found near Lyttelton. The original vegetation was believed to be a broadleaf-podocarp forest, a rare forest type seen only in small areas around New Zealand. Since 1998 volunteers have been working at restoring the native ecology of the island by regularly planting native trees and targeting pests with toxins. Evidence of native birds breeding would be a good indication that restoration efforts are working and that pest control can make Quail Island a place where native species can flourish.

    Two tree wētā spotted in a wētā hotel at the Brook Waimārama Sanctuary (Photo taken by Author: Kayla Valentine)

    Brodifacoum bait has been used on Quail Island. It is highly effective at reducing mammalian pests. Its purpose on Quail Island was to stop reintroduction of rodents. Due to Quail Island being close to the mainland, mammalian pest are able to cross over at low tide. This slow invasion prevents Quail Island from being completely predator free.

    On Quail Island the brodifacoum baits were found to have been nibbled by wētā and other invertebrates! This discovery flustered scientists. How many other native invertebrates have yet to be identified for consuming the bait?

    This discovery led to increasing concern for our wētā species, many endangered or threatened. How many have died due to our toxic baits?

    A monitoring tool showing possible wētā trails within the Brook Waimārama Sanctuary (Photo taken by Author: Kayla Valentine)

    Studies focused on invertebrate consumption of baits have primarily used baits containing 1080. The studies that involve brodifacoum have also only focused on short-term effects (14-21 days) and one-off consumption of the bait. These hungry invertebrates are likely going for more than one course of their bait snack.

    Mike Bowie and James Ross wanted to determine whether wētā were regularly consuming these forbidden snacks and whether they would survive when they did. They tested in the field and did a laboratory experiment too. The laboratory experiment consisted of wētā being fed either baits with or without brodifacoum and then monitored for 60 days for insect mortality. The field test involved monitoring traps around Quail Island for invertebrate activity.

    Unfortunately, the wētā were hungry. For the field test they found that wētā and invertebrates would line up and wait their turn to eat! The wētā had distinct bite patterns when eating the bait, compared to pests such as mice. Wētā bite marks were easy to identify. In the laboratory test there was no significant difference in mortality of wētā (50% survived that were fed bait, 71% survived that were fed the control ). Mike and James determined more research was needed to be done in order for results to be more conclusive.

    Quail Island from the Peninsula at low tide. (Image from Greg Hewgill, 2006, CC BY 2.0, Flickr)

    So, what does that tell us exactly? The baiting methods we use to get rid of the bad things are also attracting the good things! Our native species are eating the toxins we are using to remove the pests that are eating our native species! We need to find a compromise, a less risky option for our often overlooked native invertebrates.

    Brodifacoum is also a risk to birds’ species! If a bird eats an invertebrate that has eaten brodifacoum, they will be affected by the poison as well. Joanne Hoare and Kelly Hare agree with this and suggest using non-toxic or less toxic methods for pests to protect native species. There seems to be a common theme with studies done on brodifacoum… its toxic for every species! There are several concerns, not just about birds and wētā consuming the bait but many other invertebrates and species consuming it as well.

    So, to bait or not to bait? Mike Bowie and James Ross showed that although there were no significant differences in mortality through the laboratory test, the wētā were eating the bait in the field test and laboratory test. I believe that in order to protect our native species, a less toxic baiting method should be considered. This will reduce long-term harm to species such as wētā. All though brodifacoum is highly successful at getting rid of pests, it can also harm other species. If there are other methods that reduce that risk, we should start with those methods then move to toxic baits as a last resort option on ecologically sensitive areas, such as Quail Island.

    The author, Kayla Valentine, is a postgraduate student in the Postgraduate Diploma of Science at Te Whare Wānaka o Aoraki Lincoln University. This article was written as an assessment for ECOL 608 Research Methods in Ecology.

  • A Knobbly Future?

    A Knobbly Future?

    The Story of the Canterbury Knobbled Weevil

    In 2011, scientists found a mere 26 individuals of Hadramphus tuberculatus, an endemic weevil species, nestled within a small reserve in the tawny high country of Canterbury, New Zealand. This was down from 49 individuals found in 2009. Why was the Canterbury knobbled weevil on the brink of extinction, and where does the population stand now – 14 years down the track?

    Burkes Pass is like a portal – a steep hill that suddenly transforms from the Canterbury Plains of green pastures, forestry blocks and hedgerows into the vast glacial basins, dry riverbeds, tussocks and jewel-like lakes of the Mackenzie Country. The Mackenzie of South Canterbury is beautiful, but also brutal – the sweltering heat of summer paired with the freezing frosts of winter means few people live here.

    On the saddle of Burkes Pass, it was discovered that a long-lost species of weevil did indeed live in this brutal landscape. Called the Canterbury knobbled weevil or Hadramphus tuberculatus, it was scientifically named in 1887, and was found in reasonable numbers, on the then-uncultivated Canterbury Plains. Since then, it has been seldom encountered, particularly after the clearing of its favourite host plant, the Aciphylla – commonly known as the Speargrass plant.

    The weevil was considered extinct, until 2004, when a University of Canterbury student – Laura Young – stumbled across one of these knobbly weevils in a Burkes Pass reserve, rediscovering the species. However, a following study conducted in 2013 found that the species was in decline in Burkes Pass. So, how did they monitor it? How does this weevil survive and what is its future?

    Illustration of Hadramphus tuberculatus, by Des Helmore.
    Illustration of Hadramphus tuberculatus, by Desmond W. Helmore (CC BY 4.0).

    Like the birds of New Zealand, the insects here have evolved without most mammalian predators – with the New Zealand bats being an exception. Many species exhibit traits, such as flightlessness, gigantism, and an inability to self-defend from mammalian predators. The weevil genus Hadramphus is endemic to New Zealand and is a good example of these traits.

    Hadramphus contains four species: H. spinipennis, H. stilbocarpae, H. pittospori and of course the Canterbury knobbled weevil, H. tuberculatus. A common feature amongst all Hadramphus species is their larger size relative to other New Zealand weevils, their flightlessness, and their unfortunate vulnerability to recently introduced mammalian predators.

    The relatives of H. tuberculatus survive in far-flung parts of New Zealand, such as offshore islands and the remotest parts of Fiordland. H. tuberculatus lives in the tussock grasslands of Canterbury, where introduced mammalian predators are much more common. This probably explains the scarcity of the species. The Canterbury knobbled weevil also relies on speargrasses – which are terribly spiky plants but grows impressive flower bunches called inflorescences. Speargrasses were once more common on the lowlands of Canterbury, but have disappeared, due to changes in land use.

    Interestingly, the Canterbury knobbled weevil is one of the few invertebrate species in New Zealand with a legally protected status – under the Wildlife Act. Most invertebrates in New Zealand are considered unprotected.

    A Canterbury Knobbled Weevil adult in hand by Warren Chinn via iNaturalist (CC BY-NC 4.0).

    Because of the apparent threats, entomologists (insect scientists) decided to conduct a survey-based study on the Canterbury knobbled weevil population at Burkes Pass. Through the summers of 2009-2011, pitfall traps were placed out in order to catch these weevils in a small section of a Department of Conservation reserve near Burkes Pass and in adjacent private farmland. This area has large amounts of the golden speargrass (Aciphylla aurea).

    Empty pitfall traps are a type of non-deadly trap to catch insects. They are usually cups placed discreetly in the ground, that unsuspecting terrestrial critters fall into to. The researchers checked these pitfall traps weekly, and a little piece of speargrass was kept in the pitfall trap to feed trapped weevils. Weevils found in a pitfall trap were recorded, measured, and even marked with a unique identification number – in case it was recaptured.

    Unfortunately, the study showed a worrying trend. In 2009, 49 weevils were captured in the pitfall traps, then 41 weevils in 2010 – and then in a drastic drop, 26 weevils were captured in 2011.

    In the 2009 season, a small number of the weevils caught were in the farmland pitfall traps – meaning that they existed beyond the confines of the reserve. But, by 2011, this number of weevils caught in farmland became zero. This might have meant that the reserve was a better place for the weevils, but ultimately they were declining all the same. Many weevils in the reserve were recaptured again and could be re-identified with unique numbers written on their wings! Although the weevils can’t fly, some had been recaptured up to 190 metres away within the reserve – that’s a lot of walking for a flightless insect!

    So, why were the weevils declining? The researchers make no specific discussion on this point, however introduced predators may be the main culprit – particularly rodents. A more recent 2024 study on large-bodied alpine invertebrates in southern New Zealand found that sites with mice had less wētā (a group of cricket-like insects) and these wētā were slightly larger on average when compared with sites without mice. Although wētā have a different ecology to weevils, there could be a similar story going on in the Canterbury high country.

    Since this study, the outlook for the Canterbury knobbled weevil has been grim. Although a ton of work has gone into the Burkes Pass site – including pest-resistant fencing, weed control, and continued searching, there hasn’t been any recent re-discoveries of the weevil here, although bugs have a special talent of hiding in plain sight. Most people are not looking out for funny-looking weevils that live on one of the most hostile plants in New Zealand.

    In a similar circumstance to the 2004 re-discovery, John Evans happened to come across a large weevil on a speargrass near Lake Heron – in the high country of Ashburton Lakes – in 2024. Uploading the observation to iNaturalist, it was quickly confirmed as a Canterbury knobbled weevil by entomologists – revealing a new population of the species. Later searches discovered even more weevils, creating new hope that the species could live on. Despite this amazing discovery, the same conservation issues remain – how can this species be effectively protected for long-term conservation? Perhaps new initiatives for pest control need to be developed – particularly for mice – but this has yet to be established.

    Lake Heron, in the Ashburton high country basin. A new population of Hadramphus tuberculatus was recently discovered nearby. Photo by the author.

    Unlike other species of Hadramphus, the Canterbury knobbled weevil cannot rely on remote offshore islands for survival – as the Canterbury speargrass ecosystems are important for its survival. Mammalian predator control and the protection of the weevil’s host plant should be the priorities.

    Translocation of the species is another option that could be considered, especially given that the weevil did survive in captivity. The Canterbury knobbled weevil could be considered a flagship species for these unique dryland ecosystems in eastern New Zealand, which are often overlooked as important part of New Zealand biodiversity.

    The critical status of this species is a reminder of the enormous loss of biodiversity that has occurred in the Canterbury region. Imagine if knobbled weevils were commonplace on speargrass plants again, living alongside various other native flora and fauna that is facing a similar fate? Losing this species to extinction would be a further loss of what makes this region unique.

    This article was prepared by Master of Science student Noah Fenwick as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course in the Department of Pest-Management and Conservation.

    Links/References

    Bertoia A., Murray T. J., Robertson B. C., Monks J. M. (2024). Introduced mice influence the large-bodied alpine invertebrate community. Biological Invasions 26:3281-3297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-024-03370-x

    Fountain E. D., Wiseman B. H., Cruickshank R. H., & Paterson A. M. (2013). The ecology and conservation of Hadramphus tuberculatus (Pascoe 1877) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Molytinae). Journal of Insect Conservation 17:737-745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-013-9557-9

    Department of Conservation (New Zealand) Website (20 December 2024). “New population of critically endangered beetle found”. https://www.doc.govt.nz/news/media-releases/2024-media-releases/new-population-of-critically-endangered-beetle-found/

    New Zealand Legislation. Wildlife Act 1953 (6 May 2022). “Schedule 7: Terrestrial and freshwater invertebrates declared to be animals.” https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1953/0031/latest/whole.html#DLM278595

    Pawson S. M. (2005). Weevil Upheaval. New Zealand Geographic, Issue 72. https://www.nzgeo.com/stories/weevil-upheaval/

    Young L. M., Marris J. W. M., & Pawson S. M. (2008). Back from extinction: rediscovery of the Canterbury knobbled weevil Hadramphus tuberculatus (Pascoe 1877) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), with a review of its historical distribution. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 35:323-330.

  • A bounty hunter in the Subantarctic

    A bounty hunter in the Subantarctic

    I’ve been a fan of Star Wars since I was a nine year old being driven to Dunedin to see this new SF film that was supposed to be quite good. There in the Octagon Theatre my young mind was blown by what I saw. We’d never seen anything quite like it. I still can vividly recall the final attack run down the canyon on the Death Star. It was like you were in the cockpit of Luke’s X-Wing.

    Over the last 47 years I have seen most of the Star Wars movies and series. I even didn’t mind the prequel movies. One of my favourite characters was Boba Fett, the bounty hunter. He seemed cool and I liked that he didn’t take off his helmet (I was also about to become a 2000AD Judge Dredd fan, probably for similar reasons). The Mandalorian, featuring more on the galaxy bounty hunters, is one of my favourite Star Wars series.

    Who doesn’t love Grogu? Image by Adrian Paterson

    I’m not sure why I enjoy the SW IP, the stories are reasonably predictable, the names are awkward and clunky, but I guess it is fun, looks good and has some interesting diversity (it’s definitely not all filmed in an abandoned British quarry like most other SF at the time). I particularly liked the islands on Ahch-To where the elderly Luke Skywalker was living as a recluse. Their ruggedness, isolation and ‘bird’ fauna seemed like our NZ Subantarctic islands.

    In the Subantarctic we have our own bounty hunter with the strangely Star Wars-like name of Pacificana cockayni. This spider species, like a Jedi hermit, is only found on the Bounty Islands (a wind-swept collection of small islets) that are very seldom visited by humans. It spends its time hunting among a sparse five other species of spiders and 22 insect species. There are a bunch of seabird species that use the islands for breeding. It’s a harsh place to live and has a precarious food web.

    Pacificana cockayni was first collected by the great botanist, Leonard Cockayne, in 1903. There were a handful of future visits where female adults and juveniles were collected and finally a male was found. When describing a species it is useful to have adults of both sexes (and in spiders differences are exaggerated and easier to find in males). In more recent times molecular approaches, sequencing DNA, allows for a more precise understanding of who your species might be related to.

    Pacificana cockayni. Image by Thomas Mattern.

    Cockayne sent the original samples to a leading British arachnologist of the time with a decidedly non-Star Wars name, but suitably impressive nonetheless, Henry Roughton Hogg (OK maybe a little Star Warsy… I can see an Imperial Star destroyer being commanded by Admiral Roughton Hogg). Hogg decided that Pacificana cockayni was different enough from other spiders to be in its own genus. He then guessed at the family. (“These aren’t the spiders you are looking for.”)

    Over the years other travellers collected a handful of specimens when their journeys brought them to the Bountys. These include the great spider specialist Ray Forster. (“May the Forster be with you‘), one of my first PhD students, Frances Schmechel, and recent masters student, Robin Long.

    Time moves on and we are not in that galaxy far far away now. Many of the spider species lumped together as a big group by Hogg have been moved to more accurate placements by spider specialists over the last century. Cor Vink (Lincoln University), Phil Sirvid (Museum of NZ) and Nadine Duperre (Liebniz Institute) decided to sort out the status of Pacificana cockayni. They could see that things were a mess (“Hogg, you have failed me for the last time“).

    They looked carefully at the various structures of Pacificana cockayni and compared these to the various options for relatives (“Hmmm aren’t you kinda short to be a Miturgidae?”). For example, they found that the stridulatory field on prolateral face of male coxa of leg 1 was different to other closely related species (which to most sounds about as meaningful to the uninitiated as midiclorians).

    Bounty Islands – birds, rocks and a few spiders…. Image by Tui de Roy.

    Vink and colleagues were also able to get DNA from these species as well (or use DNA data that had already been collected). In a recent NZ Journal of Zoology paper they were not able to definitively sort out who the closest relatives of Pacificana cockayni were, but they could show that they had been evolutionary distinct for a long time. Given this distinctiveness and the limited range of this species to the small Bounty Islands archipelago, Pacificana cockayni faces some big problems. “I have a bad feeling about this.“

    The maximum height of the Bountys is 73 m, creating a problem with sea level rise taking away land. Climate change is altering prey patterns for the seabird species that bring guano and carrion back to the islands, and which drives the simple invertebrate food webs. Bird populations are also declining through climate influences and from fisheries. Fewer birds means less food for everyone else that’s stuck on these islands (“It’s a trap!“). And, despite the isolation, there is always the risk of a rodent invasion from a visiting boat. Rodents love munching on large invertebrates.

    Like a rare Jedi knight on the fringes of the galaxy, Pacificana cockayni have faced and triumphed over tough times. Vink and colleagues have allowed us to know just how special this species is and why we should work hard to protect it to give it a fair chance to survive into the future.

    This is the way.

    This article was written by Adrian Paterson (Pest-management and Conservation at Lincoln University). With writing EcoLincNZ articles, do or do not, there is no try.

  • Jumping to the top of the world: new salticid spider species in the Southern Alps

    Spiders.

    Your reaction to that word might determine whether or not you finish reading this post, but try to bear with me — at least for a little while. While I can accept that most people aren’t nearly as fond of spiders as I am, I think all but the truly arachnophobic (it’s okay; I understand that you can’t help it) can agree that the jumping spiders are among the “cutest” and most acceptable spider groups. These active little hunters can often be found in or around the house, and their big binocular eyes and expressive “face” make them a lot more relatable than your average creepy-crawly. Well, most of them!

    A newly-described female Ourea petroides from the Ōtira River valley, Arthur’s Pass. © own work, 2022. CC-BY-NC.

    Jumping spiders, in the family Salticidae, are among the most well-researched spiders in the world, with over 6,500 species described. Meanwhile, the jumping spiders found in Aotearoa New Zealand – apart from the most commonly-encountered species – are very poorly known to science. There are thought to be around 200 species in NZ, with about 50 known well enough to be named. However, we can only reliably identify fewer than a dozen of them. Compare this with Australia, where hundreds of species are known already, and work to describe the rest is well under way.

    Not to be outdone by the Aussies, Lincoln University’s Robin Long, along with her supervisor Dr Cor Vink, decided to do something about that. For her Master’s project, Robin set out to catalogue and describe the jumping spiders found in some of NZ’s most remote and extreme environments: the rocky heights of the South Island’s alpine zone.

    Robin visited 21 different sites all over the Southern Alps, from Paparoa to Fiordland, collecting 170 jumping spider specimens (all by hand!) from up to 1,800 m above sea level — and logging some impressive hiking mileage in the process!

    Looking across the Ōtira River at a scree slope where Ourea petroides can be found, Arthur’s Pass. © own work, 2022. CC-BY-NC.

    Through DNA analysis and careful examination of microscopic features on each spider, Robin separated those 170 specimens into 12 new species, and determined that the group was so unlike others known to science that it represented a brand new genus (a group of closely-related species with a common ancestor). She named this genus Ourea because, like the ancient Greek mountain gods, many of the species were found to be associated with a specific mountain range.

    Many of NZ’s indigenous species are only found across quite small areas, often because of the (relatively) recent and rapid growth of our mountains — which even today continue to grow taller by around 7 mm per year. Formerly widespread species were split into separate populations by the tectonic uplift, and over the last few million years these now-isolated populations have diverged into new species. Robin’s jumping spiders, much like many other NZ alpine species, took advantage of the ample prey and new habitats created by the growth of these mountain ranges. Over time these spiders even developed cryptic colours and patterns that help to camouflage them against the particular rock types they live amongst.

    Magnificent moustache: a female(!) Ourea saffroclypeus from the Remarkables Range. © Robin Long, 2022. CC-BY-NC.

    Not content with merely describing a whole genus and a dozen new species, Robin also set about studying and describing the spiders’ behaviours when interacting with other members of the same species. Jumping spiders have exceptional eyesight, and are known for communicating with each other through visual displays that range from the bronze hopper’s simple leg-waving, all the way to the flamboyant, colourful dances (which often incorporate vibration as well) performed by the aptly-named peacock spiders.

    The four Ourea species that Robin observed in the lab each exhibited a unique set of behaviours when they met another spider, and these behaviours differed depending upon whether they met a member of the same or the opposite sex. Males postured fiercely at each other, squaring up in a face-to-face grappling contest with legs and fangs outstretched.

    When attempting to impress a female, males gestured with their legs and “zigzag-danced” their way closer, before attempting to reach out and gently stroke the female’s head. Perhaps unsurprisingly, this final move had quite mixed success! Females meeting each other were a bit more sensible, and usually made a few simple (though probably quite impolite) leg gestures at each other, before one or both turned away and went in the opposite direction.

    Despite the enormous amount of work that went into researching these spiders, Robin acknowledges that her almost 150-page thesis has only scratched the surface of the topic. Little is known of the spiders’ life histories or the individual species’ spatial distributions, and it’s “very likely” that there are additional species in the genus waiting to be discovered on other mountain ranges.

    Exquisite camouflage: Ourea petroides, Ōtira River valley, Arthur’s Pass. © own work, 2022. CC-BY-NC.

    Robin also suggests a similar study would likely uncover another distantly-related group of undescribed jumping spiders living quietly in the Southern Alps. This is a common problem with New Zealand’s invertebrate fauna: while we have a good general understanding of what’s around us, there are still huge gaps in our knowledge — and usually the studies that attempt to address this just end up revealing more unanswered questions!

    We have a rich history of brilliant people, like Robin, studying, documenting, and describing New Zealand’s unique invertebrate biodiversity, and there are still many new discoveries to be made in every corner of our little country. But, despite huge technological advances, research has dwindled in recent decades due to funding redirections and the restructuring of government services.

    Under the looming threats of climate change and habitat loss, we need to pay closer attention to the smallest and most enigmatic (if not always particularly cute) creatures that live alongside us, lest they disappear before we even have a chance to study them. Australia is well ahead of NZ in this regard, with funding and support for taxonomic studies provided through their world-leading ABRS scheme. I’m not much of a sports enjoyer, but beating the Aussies at this game is one trans-Tasman rivalry I could definitely get behind.

    This article was prepared by Bachelor of Science (Honours) student Dustin la Mont as part of the ECOL608 Research Methods in Ecology course.

  • Thistle do me: a fussy biocontrol beetle

    My mother makes a great liver and bacon. Like many cooks who have spent decades on a sheep farm she is also a dab hand with a great mutton roast, scones, and sponge cakes. She can also preserve fruit at a moments notice. The highest compliment I every received for my own infrequent cooking attempts was from my son when I made some excellent gravy – “Well, he is Nanny’s son” he explained. Family feasts around birthdays and Christmas are common at my mother’s house.

    Edith’s fish pie

    One curious dish that makes an appearance amongst the roast veggies and mint sauce is a dish of fish pie. It’s not a typical part of most peoples’ ‘event dining’ but it is a regular for us in amongst the more high flying hams and legs of lamb. Mum’s humble fish pie is tasty, with lots of eggs and white sauce, and the right amount of rice and corn. More impressively, my sons, my nieces and nephews also love it.

    When someone needs a perk up, they’ve been unwell, or they are passing through on their way to a cold, old student flat, a bowl of Nanny’s fish pie will arrive. When there are lots of different options on a laden table, there is always room on your plate for the fish pie.

    Family gathering, three brothers, empty fish pie dish in centre!

    I can understand how I like it, I’ve been eating it all of my life. I guess it is the same for the grandchildren. It’s a constant and comforting food. I’m sure that every family probably has a similar dish.

    How ingrained are food preferences? Do we build them up over a lifetime of experience or do we arrive with inherited preferences? Perhaps a bit of both? It can make a difference.

    Thistles, from the Cardueae tribe, have been introduced into New Zealand, mostly by mistake as passengers with more useful seeds. Like many other species, thistles have done well here and have established in large numbers and with wide distributions. One of the worst is the Californian thistle (Cirsium arvense), close relative of a nearly as successful invader, and a little more photogenic, Scotch thistle (Cirsium vulgare).

    There have been many attempts to control the spread of these thistles with varying, but generally unsuccessful, outcomes. Ideally, it is great to have a solution that can work without too much effort on our part. A successful biocontrol agent can fit that prescription.

    The green thistle beetle (Cassida rubiginosa) forages and lays eggs for their larvae to grow on species from the Cardueae tribe. This creates problems for health and survival of these plants. Excellent, a solution to our prickly problem!

    Cirsium

    Not so fast. Cardueae is a large group (over 2400 species with many natives in New Zealand). The last thing that we need is a beetle that chomps up lots of the species that we are trying to protect. We also don’t want a beetle that gets distracted by eating other species when it should be eating the target. We’ve been there and done that (see the mustelids brought into NZ to eat the rabbits! Oops). We need to know that this beetle is a little more fussy in its likes.

    A Lincoln-based group, including Jon Sullivan from Pest-management and Conservation, have tested the preferences of the green thistle beetle. They have published in Pest Management Science. They selected 16 different plant species from the Cardueae tribe. Beetles were given the chance to eat each species either with no choice (plonk the beetles on a plant and see what they do) or choice (allow them to select between any pair that is presented to them).

    Crucially, the evolutionary relationships were known between the different plant species. Ideally we want the beetles to only eat thistle species of interest and not just anything vaguely similar (just those that are closely related).

    Green thistle beetle samples in Lincoln University Entomology Research Museum.

    When given no choice the beetles tended to make the best of what was offered. When you are really hungry then that marmalade is edible even if you don’t like it! Give the beetle a choice, however, and they go for the species that is most closely related to the Cirsium species. In fact this was such a strong preference that the researchers were able to conclude that the green thistle beetle is very unlikely to become a problem for anything other than the thistles that we want to control.

    The green thistle beetles are born with preferences for the type of plant that they want to eat and to lay their larvae in. These preferences allow them to adapt and specialise more fully to these plant species. New Zealand does not have any native Cirsium, or other closely related species. So the beetle can go forth and munch to their hearts’ content.

    So, was I born with a hankering for mum’s fish pie? Well it is an old family recipe, so the preference for it probably has passed down through our lineage, probably as something that we re-learn every generation. Now if I get some grandchildren, I will have to make sure that they are exposed to fish pie at an early age!

    Adrian Paterson is a lecturer in Pest-Management and Conservation at Lincoln University. He has a lot of preferences that he would like to explain!